Literature DB >> 23619414

Flies developed small bodies and small cells in warm and in thermally fluctuating environments.

Marcin Czarnoleski1, Brandon S Cooper, Justyna Kierat, Michael J Angilletta.   

Abstract

Although plasma membranes benefit cells by regulating the flux of materials to and from the environment, these membranes cost energy to maintain. Because smaller cells provide relatively more membrane area for transport, ectotherms that develop in warm environments should consist of small cells despite the energetic cost. Effects of constant temperatures on cell size qualitatively match this prediction, but effects of thermal fluctuations on cell size are unknown. Thermal fluctuations could favour either small or large cells; small cells facilitate transport during peaks in metabolic demand whereas large cells minimize the resources needed for homeoviscous adaptation. To explore this problem, we examined effects of thermal fluctuations during development on the size of epidermal cells in the wings of Drosophila melanogaster. Flies derived from a temperate population were raised at two mean temperatures (18 and 25°C), with either no variation or a daily variation of ±4°C. Flies developed faster at a mean temperature of 25°C. Thermal fluctuations sped development, but only at 18°C. An increase in the mean and variance of temperature caused flies to develop smaller cells and wings. Thermal fluctuations reduced the size of males at 18°C and the size of females at 25°C. The thorax, the wings and the cells decreased with an increase in the mean and in the variance of temperature, but the response of cells was the strongest. Based on this pattern, we hypothesize that development of the greater area of membranes under thermal fluctuations provides a metabolic advantage that outweighs the greater energetic cost of remodelling membranes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; body size; cell size; homeoviscous adaptation; oxygen permeability; phenotypic plasticity; plasma membrane; thermal adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23619414      PMCID: PMC3713948          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.083535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  25 in total

1.  Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Protists decrease in size linearly with temperature: ca. 2.5% degrees C(-1).

Authors:  David Atkinson; Benjamin J Ciotti; David J S Montagnes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling.

Authors:  J Kozłowski; M Konarzewski; A T Gawelczyk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cell size is positively correlated between different tissues in passerine birds and amphibians, but not necessarily in mammals.

Authors:  J Kozlowski; M Czarnoleski; A François-Krassowska; S Maciak; T Pis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Cell size but not genome size affects scaling of metabolic rate in eyelid geckos.

Authors:  Zuzana Starostová; Lukás Kubicka; Marek Konarzewski; Jan Kozłowski; Lukás Kratochvíl
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  Thermal adaptation in biological membranes: is homeoviscous adaptation the explanation?

Authors:  J R Hazel
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 19.318

7.  Cell size and the concept of wasteful and frugal evolutionary strategies.

Authors:  H Szarski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1983-11-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Oxygen permeability of phosphatidylcholine--cholesterol membranes.

Authors:  W K Subczynski; J S Hyde; A Kusumi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Climate variations and the physiological basis of temperature dependent biogeography: systemic to molecular hierarchy of thermal tolerance in animals.

Authors:  H O Pörtner
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.320

10.  Fitness variation in response to artificial selection for reduced cell area, cell number and wing area in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Vincenzo Trotta; Federico C F Calboli; Marcello Ziosi; Sandro Cavicchi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  14 in total

1.  Invariance and plasticity in the Drosophila melanogaster metabolomic network in response to temperature.

Authors:  Ramkumar Hariharan; Jessica M Hoffman; Ariel S Thomas; Quinlyn A Soltow; Dean P Jones; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-12-24

2.  Flies evolved small bodies and cells at high or fluctuating temperatures.

Authors:  Gregory J Adrian; Marcin Czarnoleski; Michael J Angilletta
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Not all cells are equal: effects of temperature and sex on the size of different cell types in the Madagascar ground gecko Paroedura picta.

Authors:  Marcin Czarnoleski; Anna Maria Labecka; Zuzana Starostová; Anna Sikorska; Elżbieta Bonda-Ostaszewska; Katarzyna Woch; Lukáš Kubička; Lukáš Kratochvíl; Jan Kozlowski
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.422

4.  Scaling of thermal tolerance with body mass and genome size in ectotherms: a comparison between water- and air-breathers.

Authors:  Félix P Leiva; Piero Calosi; Wilco C E P Verberk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Seasonal cues induce phenotypic plasticity of Drosophila suzukii to enhance winter survival.

Authors:  Peter W Shearer; Jessica D West; Vaughn M Walton; Preston H Brown; Nicolas Svetec; Joanna C Chiu
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Parallel trait adaptation across opposing thermal environments in experimental Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Ray Tobler; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Concerted evolution of body mass and cell size: similar patterns among species of birds (Galliformes) and mammals (Rodentia).

Authors:  Marcin Czarnoleski; Anna Maria Labecka; Dominika Dragosz-Kluska; Tomasz Pis; Katarzyna Pawlik; Filip Kapustka; Wincenty M Kilarski; Jan Kozłowski
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Effects of thermal and oxygen conditions during development on cell size in the common rough woodlice Porcellio scaber.

Authors:  Andrzej Antoł; Anna Maria Labecka; Terézia Horváthová; Anna Sikorska; Natalia Szabla; Ulf Bauchinger; Jan Kozłowski; Marcin Czarnoleski
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Effects of developmental plasticity on heat tolerance may be mediated by changes in cell size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nadja Verspagen; Félix P Leiva; Irene M Janssen; Wilco C E P Verberk
Journal:  Insect Sci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.262

10.  Shrinking body sizes in response to warming: explanations for the temperature-size rule with special emphasis on the role of oxygen.

Authors:  Wilco C E P Verberk; David Atkinson; K Natan Hoefnagel; Andrew G Hirst; Curtis R Horne; Henk Siepel
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2020-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.