Literature DB >> 23618714

Draft Genome Sequence of MKD8, a Conjugal Recipient Mycobacterium smegmatis Strain.

Todd A Gray1, Michael J Palumbo, Keith M Derbyshire.   

Abstract

We report an annotated draft genome sequence of the Mycobacterium smegmatis strain MKD8. This strain acts as a recipient during conjugation with the reference M. smegmatis strain mc(2)155. While the genomes of the two strains are colinear and have similar sizes, extensive genome-wide sequence variation suggests rich diversity within the M. smegmatis clade.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23618714      PMCID: PMC3636542          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00148-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Mycobacteria are a biologically diverse group of bacteria that range from obligate pathogens, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, to free-living saprophytes, such as Mycobacterium smegmatis. M. smegmatis is the model organism for all mycobacterial research because it is nonpathogenic, relatively fast-growing, genetically facile, and well suited for high-throughput analyses (1, 2). Natural isolates of M. smegmatis participate in a novel form of conjugation, termed distributive conjugal transfer, in which chromosomal DNA segments are transferred from a donor strain to a recipient strain (3, 4) and generate transconjugant progeny with highly mosaic genomes (T. A. Gray, J. Krywy, J. Harold, M. J. Palumbo, and K. M. Derbyshire, submitted for publication). Our standard experimental conjugation system pairs the widely used laboratory strain M. smegmatis mc2155 (a donor) with an independent strain, M. smegmatis MKD8 (a recipient). MKD8 is a spontaneous streptomycin-resistant subclone of M. smegmatis mc2874 (lysA ept [5]), derived from the original isolate, M. smegmatis PM5 (6). Determining the chromosomal sequence of this strain is necessary to accurately analyze the mosaic transconjugant genomes, identify those genes that distinguish donor and recipient functions, and begin to explore the rich genetic diversity of M. smegmatis strains. The genomic sequence of M. smegmatis MKD8 was compiled from the data from three approaches: an initial 454 library, an Illumina ~250-bp paired-end library, and a second 454 approach yielding a ~3-kb paired-end library to join some of the repeat-separated contigs. Aggregate reads were assembled de novo using Celera Assembler with the Best Overlap Graph (CABOG) (7) and Velvet (8). The two scaffolds were separated by the two rRNA loci present in M. smegmatis. The assembled draft genome was annotated using the Annotation Engine service (http://ae.igs.umaryland.edu/cgi/index.cgi) and visualized using the Manatee genome curation and browsing tool (http://manatee.sourceforge.net). The MKD8 genome is 7,092,137 bp long, with an overall G+C content of 67.3%, similar to that of mc2155 (6,988,209 bp; GenBank accession no. NC_008596). Whole-genome comparisons by Mauve (9) showed an overall colinearity between the two strains but significant sequence divergence (1.6% overall single-nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] frequency and 649 indels of >19 bp). One notable difference is that MKD8 lacks the 55.2-kb genome duplication present in mc2155 (msmeg1002 to msmeg1058). Subsets of these SNPs and indels are likely responsible for the many phenotypic differences displayed by these two strains (e.g., in donor and recipient activities, colony morphology, phage susceptibility, biofilm formation, and streptomycin resistance). Conjugation in mycobacteria generates progeny that are genetic mosaics of the parental strains. Since multiple independent strains of M. smegmatis are conjugationally active (3, 10), mosaic transconjugant genomes could be generated with genes that are lost, acquired, replaced, or blended. Such mosaic transconjugant genotypes might combine phenotypes, or potentially create new phenotypes, to promote the colonization of different environmental niches or hosts. Therefore, transconjugants generated today may become the extant mycobacteria of tomorrow. Establishing the reference genomes of conjugationally active mycobacteria is essential for recognizing the products of conjugation, estimating the gene flow through the community, and identifying the genetic basis of the phenotypes that drive the evolution of mycobacteria. The determination of the MKD8 sequence is an important first step in that direction.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The assembled and annotated draft genome sequence of M. smegmatis MKD8 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. CM001762.
  10 in total

1.  Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements.

Authors:  Aaron C E Darling; Bob Mau; Frederick R Blattner; Nicole T Perna
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Biosynthesis of diaminopimelate, the precursor of lysine and a component of peptidoglycan, is an essential function of Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Authors:  M S Pavelka; W R Jacobs
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Multiple mating types of Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Authors:  Y Mizuguchi; K Suga; T Tokunaga
Journal:  Jpn J Microbiol       Date:  1976-10

5.  Genetic recombination in mycobacteria.

Authors:  T Tokunaga; Y Mizuguchi; K Suga
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Isolation and characterization of efficient plasmid transformation mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Authors:  S B Snapper; R E Melton; S Mustafa; T Kieser; W R Jacobs
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  Chromosomal DNA transfer in Mycobacterium smegmatis is mechanistically different from classical Hfr chromosomal DNA transfer.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Pavan K Karnati; Carter M Takacs; Joseph C Kowalski; Keith M Derbyshire
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Conjugal transfer of chromosomal DNA in Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Authors:  L M Parsons; C S Jankowski; K M Derbyshire
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 9.  To catch a killer. What can mycobacterial models teach us about Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis?

Authors:  Michael U Shiloh; Patricia A DiGiuseppe Champion
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 7.934

10.  Aggressive assembly of pyrosequencing reads with mates.

Authors:  Jason R Miller; Arthur L Delcher; Sergey Koren; Eli Venter; Brian P Walenz; Anushka Brownley; Justin Johnson; Kelvin Li; Clark Mobarry; Granger Sutton
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 6.937

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Application of Distributive Conjugal DNA Transfer in Mycobacterium smegmatis To Establish a Genome-Wide Synthetic Genetic Array.

Authors:  Julius Judd; Nathalie Boucher; Erik Van Roey; Todd A Gray; Keith M Derbyshire
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Iron limitation in M. tuberculosis has broad impact on central carbon metabolism.

Authors:  Monique E Theriault; Davide Pisu; Kaley M Wilburn; Gabrielle Lê-Bury; Case W MacNamara; H Michael Petrassi; Melissa Love; Jeremy M Rock; Brian C VanderVen; David G Russell
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-07-09

3.  A recently evolved diflavin-containing monomeric nitrate reductase is responsible for highly efficient bacterial nitrate assimilation.

Authors:  Wei Tan; Tian-Hua Liao; Jin Wang; Yu Ye; Yu-Chen Wei; Hao-Kui Zhou; Youli Xiao; Xiao-Yang Zhi; Zhi-Hui Shao; Liang-Dong Lyu; Guo-Ping Zhao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Proteogenomic Analysis of Mycobacterium smegmatis Using High Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Matthys G Potgieter; Kehilwe C Nakedi; Jon M Ambler; Andrew J M Nel; Shaun Garnett; Nelson C Soares; Nicola Mulder; Jonathan M Blackburn
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.