Literature DB >> 23618684

Is consulting patients about their health service preferences a useful exercise?

Julia Lawton1, David Rankin, Jackie Elliott.   

Abstract

As part of the shift toward patient-centered care, patients are increasingly being consulted about their preferences for health services and interventions, including those explored during randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to ensure that service recommendations are aligned to their own circumstances and needs. Hence, we interviewed patients (N = 40) who participated in a randomized control trial comparing diabetes education courses delivered using two different formats to establish whether, and why, they preferred one format to the other, to inform recommendations for future course delivery. Not only did patients report changing their preferences, and the reasons underlying these preferences, over time, but all patients also claimed to prefer the particular course they had attended. We use our findings and experiences to problematize the notion of a patient preference and to raise questions about what we can really learn from consulting patients about the care they receive within the context of an RCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes; health care, user’s experiences; interviews; program evaluation; research design; research participation; research, qualitative

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23618684     DOI: 10.1177/1049732313485161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  5 in total

1.  Understanding messaging preferences to inform development of mobile goal-directed behavioral interventions.

Authors:  Frederick Muench; Katherine van Stolk-Cooke; Jon Morgenstern; Alexis N Kuerbis; Kendra Markle
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Staff experiences of closing out a clinical trial involving withdrawal of treatment: qualitative study.

Authors:  Julia Lawton; David White; David Rankin; Jackie Elliott; Carolin Taylor; Cindy Cooper; Simon Heller; Nina Hallowell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Experiences, needs, and preferences for follow-up after stroke perceived by people with stroke and healthcare professionals: A focus group study.

Authors:  Emma K Kjörk; Carlsson Gunnel; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Katharina S Sunnerhagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  'She taught me': factors consumers find important in nurse practitioner and pharmacist prescriber services.

Authors:  Tara N Officer; Jackie Cumming; Karen McBride-Henry
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2021-03-26

5.  Family preferences for home or hospital care at diagnosis for children with diabetes in the DECIDE study.

Authors:  S Morgan-Trimmer; S Channon; J W Gregory; J Townson; L Lowes
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.