| Literature DB >> 23618489 |
Mohan Joshi1, Raghvendra Gumashta.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nutritional anaemia in India is common morbidity seen in late adolescent and young female population. There are many conflicting opinions regarding dosage of iron folic acid supplementation for managing this simple nutritional deficiency disorder. Hence, this 'Randomized Controlled Trial' was undertaken in adolescent girls suffering from Iron Deficiency Anaemia visiting 'Urban Health and Training Centre' situated in urban slum area. The aim of this study was to assess the (a) Impact of weekly iron folic acid supplementation in comparison with daily iron supplementation for the management of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in adolescent girls visiting 'Urban Health and Training Centre'; (b) Adverse drug reaction profile in 'Weekly Iron Folic Acid Supplementation' and 'Daily Iron Folic Acid Supplementation' regimes; (c) Compliance profile for 'Weekly Iron Folic Acid Supplementation' and 'Daily Iron Folic Acid Supplementation' regimes in adolescent girls. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Randomized controlled trial was conducted in adolescent girls visiting 'Urban Health and Training Centre' during the study period June, 2011 to October, 2012. The 120 anaemic (Haemoglobin < 12 gm%) adolescent girls (10-19 years) were distributed randomly by block randomization in two groups; one receiving daily Iron and Folic Acid supplementation and in other group receiving weekly Iron and Folic Acid supplementation for 3 months. All the study subjects were given de-worming (Albendazole 400 mg) and required health education separately. Both the groups were monitored for Haemoglobin estimation, compliance and adverse drug reactions, if any. Open-Epi Statistical Software was used for data analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23618489 PMCID: PMC4776831 DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v5n3p188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob J Health Sci ISSN: 1916-9736
Comparison of anaemia status before and after intervention among daily IFA supplementation (DIFS) and weekly IFA supplementation (WIFS) groups
| Hb (gm%) | No. of adolescents | Inter group ‘p value’ by matched pair t test of ‘after intervention’ results among both groups: (b) and (d) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daily IFA Supplementation(n=60) | Weekly IFA Supplementation(n=60) | ||||||
| Before intervention(a) | After intervention(b) | P value | Before intervention(c) | After intervention(d) | p value | ||
| 00 | 15(25%) | 00 | 19(31.67%) | 0.001 | |||
| 37(61.67%) | 39(65%) | < 0.001 | 44(73.33%) | 37(61.67%) | < 0.001 | ||
| 22(36.67%) | 06(10%) | 16(26.67%) | 04(6.66%) | ||||
| 01(1.66%) | 00 | 00 | 00 | ||||
| 60 (100%) | 60 (100%) | 60 (100%) | 60 (100%) | ||||
Comparison of mean Hb level before and after intervention among daily IFA supplementation and weekly IFA supplementation groups (By “Two Sample Independent t Test” with 2 side C.I. 95%)
| Hb (gm%) | Daily IFA Supplementation Group(n=60) | Weekly IFA Supplementation Group(n=60) | Difference of mean rise of Hb (gm%) DIFAS Vs. WIFAS | p value for ‘rise of mean Hb (gm%)’ among DIFAS and WIFAS Groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Hb (gm%) | Rise of mean Hb (gm%) | Mean Hb (gm%) | Rise of mean Hb (gm%) | |||||||
| p value | p value | |||||||||
| 10-11.9(Mild Anaemia) | 10.8+0.5 | 11.6+ 0.8 | < 0.001 | +0.8+ 0.7 | 11.0+ 0.6 | 11.7+ 0.7 | < 0.001 | +0.6+ 0.6 | + 0.2 | |
| 7-9.9(Moderate Anaemia) | 9.25+0.52 | 10.61+ 0.66 | < 0.001 | +1.37+ 0.67 | 8.98+0.97 | 10.67+ 0.97 | < 0.001 | +1.68+ 0.82 | - 0.31 | |
| < 7 (Severe Anaemia) | 5.6 | 7.4 | - | 1.8 | NA | NA | - | NA | NA | |
| 10.1+1.1 | 11.2+ 1.0 | < 0.001 | 10.4+1.1 | 11.4+ 0.9 | < 0.001 | 0.0 | 0.53 | |||
B.I.: Before Intervention; A.I.: After Intervention; NA: Not Applicable
Adverse drug reactions in daily IFA supplementation group and weekly IFA supplementation group
| Adverse Drug Reactions(ADR) | Daily IFA Supplementation Group(n=60) | Weekly IFA Supplementation Group(n=60) |
|---|---|---|
| Constipation | 2 | 0 |
| Nausea | 1 | 0 |
| Abdominal Pain | 4 | 3 |
| Rash | 1 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 2 |
Observed IFA intake compliance among the two groups
| Daily IFA Supplementation Group (n=60) | Weekly IFA Supplementation Group (n=60) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total IFA tablets given | 5400 | 780 | |
| Total unconsumed IFA tablets | 366 | 78 | |
| No. of IFA tablets provided to each participant after counselling session | 90 | 13 | |
| Mean of unconsumed IFA tablets | 6.1 ± 10.98 | 1.3 ± 3.15 | 0.0012 |