Allison W Watts1, Louise C Masse. 1. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. allison.watts@ubc.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The workplace represents an important setting for increasing physical activity levels. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the workplace environment and leisure-time physical activity, using a nationally representative sample of the Canadian population. METHODS: This study used cross-sectional, self-reported data from 48,916 participants who completed relevant questions on the 2008 Canadian Community Health Survey. Associations between supportive workplace environments for physical activity (e.g., perceived range of amenities available such as a pleasant place to walk, fitness facility, showers, and health program) and leisure-time physical activity level (active, moderately active, inactive) were examined using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Approximately three quarters (n=36,216) of participants had access to at least one amenity that supported physical activity while at work. Females in the lowest age category (18-35 years) who perceived a more supportive workplace environment for physical activity had higher odds of being moderately active (AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08) and active (AOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.17) as compared to inactive in their leisure time. The strength of this association was slightly higher with age and for males. CONCLUSIONS: Since the majority of Canadian adults do not meet recommended levels of physical activity, the workplace offers a promising and modifiable target for increasing opportunities to be physically active. Employers who can provide a more supportive workplace environment for physical activity would benefit, as it can increase employees' physical activity levels and ultimately improve their productivity and overall health. These benefits may be increased for males and with employees' age.
OBJECTIVE: The workplace represents an important setting for increasing physical activity levels. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the workplace environment and leisure-time physical activity, using a nationally representative sample of the Canadian population. METHODS: This study used cross-sectional, self-reported data from 48,916 participants who completed relevant questions on the 2008 Canadian Community Health Survey. Associations between supportive workplace environments for physical activity (e.g., perceived range of amenities available such as a pleasant place to walk, fitness facility, showers, and health program) and leisure-time physical activity level (active, moderately active, inactive) were examined using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Approximately three quarters (n=36,216) of participants had access to at least one amenity that supported physical activity while at work. Females in the lowest age category (18-35 years) who perceived a more supportive workplace environment for physical activity had higher odds of being moderately active (AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08) and active (AOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.17) as compared to inactive in their leisure time. The strength of this association was slightly higher with age and for males. CONCLUSIONS: Since the majority of Canadian adults do not meet recommended levels of physical activity, the workplace offers a promising and modifiable target for increasing opportunities to be physically active. Employers who can provide a more supportive workplace environment for physical activity would benefit, as it can increase employees' physical activity levels and ultimately improve their productivity and overall health. These benefits may be increased for males and with employees' age.
Entities:
Keywords:
Exercise; environment; public health; workplace
Authors: Allison W Watts; Melissa N Laska; Nicole I Larson; Dianne R Neumark-Sztainer Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Anne Rongen; Suzan J W Robroek; Wouter van Ginkel; Dennis Lindeboom; Martin Pet; Alex Burdorf Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jean-Michel Oppert; Marie-Aline Charles; Hélène Charreire; Mehdi Menai; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Soren Brage; Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain; Guy Fagherazzi; Beverley Balkau Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 3.390