Literature DB >> 23617288

IMRT or 3D-CRT in glioblastoma? A dosimetric criterion for patient selection.

S Lorentini1, D Amelio, M G Giri, F Fellin, G Meliado, A Rizzotti, M Amichetti, M Schwarz.   

Abstract

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly employed in glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. The present work aimed to assess which clinical-dosimetric scenario could benefit the most from IMRT application, with respect to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). The number of organs at risk (OARs) overlapping the planning target volume (PTV) was the parameter describing the clinical-dosimetric pattern. Based on the results, a dosimetric decision criterion to select the most appropriate treatment technique is provided. Seventeen previously irradiated patients were retrieved and re-planned with both 3D-CRT and IMRT. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy/30fx. The cases were divided into 4 groups (4 patients in each group). Each group represents the scenario where 0, 1, 2 or 3 OARs overlapped the target volume, respectively. Furthermore, in one case, 4 OARs overlapped the PTV. The techniques were compared also in terms of irradiated healthy brain tissue. The results were evaluated by paired t-test. IMRT always provided better target coverage (V95%) than 3D-CRT, regardless the clinical-dosimetric scenario: difference ranged from 0.82% (p = 0.4) for scenario 0 to 7.8% (p = 0.02) for scenario 3, passing through 2.54% (p = 0.18) and 5.93% (p = 0.08) for scenario 1 and 2, respectively. IMRT and 3D-CRT achieved comparable results in terms of dose homogeneity and conformity. Concerning the irradiation of serial-kind OARs, both techniques provided nearly identical results. A statistically significant dose reduction to the healthy brain in favor of IMRT was scored. IMRT seems a superior technique compared to 3D-CRT when there are multiple overlaps between OAR and PTV. In this scenario, IMRT allows for a better target coverage while maintaining equivalent OARs sparing and reducing healthy brain irradiation. The results from our patients dataset suggests that the overlap of three OARs can be used as a dosimetric criterion to select which patients should receive IMRT treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617288     DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  9 in total

1.  Pattern of relapse of glioblastoma multiforme treated with radical radio-chemotherapy: Could a margin reduction be proposed?

Authors:  Michela Buglione; Sara Pedretti; Pietro Luigi Poliani; Roberto Liserre; Stefano Gipponi; Giannantonio Spena; Paolo Borghetti; Ludovica Pegurri; Federica Saiani; Luigi Spiazzi; Giulia Tesini; Chiara Uccelli; Luca Triggiani; Stefano Maria Magrini
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Radiomic signature of infiltration in peritumoral edema predicts subsequent recurrence in glioblastoma: implications for personalized radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Saima Rathore; Hamed Akbari; Jimit Doshi; Gaurav Shukla; Martin Rozycki; Michel Bilello; Robert Lustig; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and RapidArc with single arc and dual arc for malignant glioma involving the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Jun Yuan; Mingjun Lei; Zhen Yang; Jun Fu; Lei Huo; Jidong Hong
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-22

4.  Imaging Surrogates of Infiltration Obtained Via Multiparametric Imaging Pattern Analysis Predict Subsequent Location of Recurrence of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hamed Akbari; Luke Macyszyn; Xiao Da; Michel Bilello; Ronald L Wolf; Maria Martinez-Lage; George Biros; Michelle Alonso-Basanta; Donald M OʼRourke; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Does the dural resection bed need to be irradiated? Patterns of recurrence and implications for postoperative radiotherapy for temporal lobe gliomas.

Authors:  Achiraya Teyateeti; Connie S Geno; Scott S Stafford; Anita Mahajan; Elizabeth S Yan; Kenneth W Merrell; Nadia N Laack; Ian F Parney; Paul D Brown; Krishan R Jethwa
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-11-04

6.  Can 3D-CRT meet the desired dose distribution to target and OARs in glioblastoma? A tertiary cancer center experience.

Authors:  Narendra Kumar; Srinivasa Gy; Chinna B Dracham; Treshita Dey; Renu Madan; Divya Khosla; Arun Oinum; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2020-09-18

7.  A prospective comparison of adaptive and fixed boost plans in radiotherapy for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Tomohiko Matsuyama; Yoshiyuki Fukugawa; Junichiro Kuroda; Ryo Toya; Takahiro Watakabe; Tadashi Matsumoto; Natsuo Oya
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Optimising tumour coverage and organ at risk sparing for hypofractionated re-irradiation in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Christopher J H Pagett; John Lilley; Rebecca Lindsay; Susan Short; Louise Murray
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-24

9.  Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy.

Authors:  Pierina Navarria; Federico Pessina; Luca Cozzi; Anna Maria Ascolese; Francesca Lobefalo; Antonella Stravato; Giuseppe D'Agostino; Ciro Franzese; Manuela Caroli; Lorenzo Bello; Marta Scorsetti
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.