Literature DB >> 23617287

Segment edit and segment weight optimization: two techniques for intensity modulated radiation therapy and their application to the planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Qilin Li1, Honglei Pei, Jingming Mu, Qiang Hu, Wendong Gu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the two functions: segment weight optimization (SWO) and segment edit (SE) in the latest XiO 4.7 radiation treatment planning system and their effect on the planning of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC). SWO first appeared in XiO 4.5 and SE in XiO 4.7. Twelve patients with NPC were selected and there were three plans for each patient: the common step-and-shoot IMRT plan (C-IMRT); S-IMRT was based on the result of C-IMRT and the plan was further optimized with SWO; F-IMRT was based on S-IMRT and the segments were edited for lowering the dose received by normal tissues. The paired plans were analyzed by comparing the total number of segments, monitor units, the homogeneity index and conformity index of the target volumes and the dose delivered to organs at risk (OAR) including spinal cord, brain stem, optic nerves, chiasm, parotids and larynx. The study exhibited that the total number of segments and monitor units of S-IMRT and F-IMRT were around 25.3%, 3.4% less than those of C-IMRT respectively. The HI and CI indexes of target volumes among three kinds of plans did not show the significant difference. The doses received by spinal cord, brain stem, parotids, larynx were decreased at S-IMRT and F-IMRT as compared to C-IMRT; the highest doses delivered to chiasm and optic nerves were S-IMRT, the next C-IMRT, the lowest F-IMRT. This study showed that the SWO function could substantially reduce the total number of segments of step-and-shoot IMRT plans and the SE function had the incredible ability to lower the dose received by normal tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617287     DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  4 in total

1.  Dosimetric Evaluation of a Simple Planning Technique for Improving Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Mei Li; Bao-Tian Huang; Wen-Jia Xie; Liang-Xi Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Hippocampus Sparing Volume Modulated Arc Therapy does not Influence Plan Quality on Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Wendong Gu; Qilin Li; Dan Xi; Ye Tian; Juncong Mo; Honglei Pei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Collimator rotation in volumetric modulated arc therapy for craniospinal irradiation and the dose distribution in the beam junction region.

Authors:  Qilin Li; Wendong Gu; Jinming Mu; Wenming Yin; Min Gao; Juncong Mo; Honglei Pei
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Frameless stereotactic body radiation therapy for multiple lung metastases.

Authors:  Qilin Li; Jinming Mu; Wendong Gu; Yuan Chen; Zhonghua Ning; Jianxue Jin; Honglei Pei
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.