Literature DB >> 23616892

Evaluation of the pressure ulcer prevention clinical decision report for bedside nurses in acute care hospitals.

A Talsma1, D Tschannen, Y Guo, J Kazemi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital stays for patients with pressure ulcers (PU) increased nearly 80% from 1992 to 2006. Most PU's developed during an admission, often despite preventive efforts from clinical staff. Data from Electronic medical records (EMR's) were used to prepare daily patient risk factor and PU information for nurses to help prevent PU development and exacerbations.
OBJECTIVES: THE OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY WERE TO DETERMINE WHETHER: 1) dissemination of an automated daily report with patient risk and current status of pressure ulcers ("PU Daily") helps prevent the development of pressure ulcers, and 2) using the PU Daily information impacts the severity of pressure ulcers that develop in an acute care setting.
METHODS: A pre-post study with four control units was designed to determine the impact of the PU Daily in intensive care units (ICU) in a large medical center. The control units included ICU's using the same EMR and similar complexity of cases with a high risk of developing a PU. The pre-post study took place over a six month period (March - August 2009).
RESULTS: A total of 6,735 cases were included in the study. The intervention unit showed a significant decrease (p = 0.004) in PU's at post-evaluation; none of the four comparison units showed a decrease at the p<0.05 level. The intervention led to a significant reduction in the total number of PU's documented (p <0.000) and the number of Stage II PU's (p = 0.046).
CONCLUSION: The intervention with the PU Daily showed a significant decrease in the total PU's and severity of PU's and allowed for implementation of interventions that help prevent the development of PU's. As EMR's become more widely available, this intervention showed a reduction in PU's. Future studies should further develop this intervention and include multiple institutions and patient populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMR; Electronic medical records; ICU; intervention; pressure ulcers; prevention

Year:  2011        PMID: 23616892      PMCID: PMC3612994          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-07-RA-0046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  10 in total

1.  Using the TRIP model to disseminate an IT-based pressure ulcer intervention.

Authors:  Dana Tschannen; Akkeneel Talsma; Jan Gombert; Jolé L Mowry
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  An anesthesia information system designed to provide physician-specific feedback improves timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics.

Authors:  Michael O'Reilly; AkkeNeel Talsma; Sharon VanRiper; Sachin Kheterpal; Richard Burney
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Pressure ulcer stages revised by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 4.  New opportunities to improve pressure ulcer prevention and treatment: implications of the CMS inpatient hospital care Present on Admission (POA) indicators/hospital-acquired conditions (HAC) policy. A consensus paper from the International Expert Wound Care Advisory Panel.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Elizabeth A Ayello; Kathleen Leask Capitulo; Evonne Fowler; Diane L Krasner; Jeffrey M Levine; R Gary Sibbald; Adrianne P S Smith
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

5.  Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2009-08-27

6.  Use of computerized ICU documentation to capture ICU core measures.

Authors:  Wendy Lynn Wahl; Akkeneel Talsma; Carrie Dawson; Sharon Dickinson; Kori Pennington; Donna Wilson; Saman Arbabi; Paul A Taheri
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B J Braden; A Laguzza; V Holman
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Pressure ulcers: implementation of evidence-based nursing practice.

Authors:  Heather F Clarke; Chris Bradley; Sandra Whytock; Shannon Handfield; Rena van der Wal; Sharon Gundry
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Theo Dassen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 5.837

10.  Results of the 2008-2009 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey and a 3-year, acute care, unit-specific analysis.

Authors:  Catherine VanGilder; Stephanie Amlung; Patrick Harrison; Stephanie Meyer
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.629

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.