Literature DB >> 23616850

Registers for Networked Medical Research in Germany: Situation and prospects.

J Stausberg1, U Altmann, G Antony, J Drepper, U Sax, A Schütt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several disease specific registers are operated by members of the 'TMF - Technology, Methods, and Infrastructure for Networked Medical Research', an umbrella organization of research networks in Germany.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the coverage and the current state as well as financial and organizational issues of registers operated by member networks of the TMF, to identify their requirements and needs, and to recommend best practice models.
METHODS: A survey with a self-completion questionnaire including all 55 TMF member networks was carried out in winter 2007/2008. Interviews focusing on technological issues were conducted and analyzed in summer 2009 with a convenience sample of 10 registers.
RESULTS: From 55 TMF member networks, 11 provided information about 14 registers. Six registers address diseases of the circulatory system with more than 150,000 registered patients. The interviews revealed a typical setting of "research registers". Research registers are an important mean to generate hypotheses for clinical research, to identify eligible patients, and to share data with clinical trials. Concerning technical solutions, we found a remarkable heterogeneity. The analysis of the most efficient registers revealed a structure with five levels as best practice model of register management: executive, operations, IT-management, software, hardware.
CONCLUSION: In the last ten years, the TMF member networks established disease specific registers in Germany mainly to support clinical research. The heterogeneity of organizational and technical solutions as well as deficits in register planning motivated the development of respective recommendations. The TMF will continue to assist the registers in quality improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competence Networks; documentation; register protocol; registers

Year:  2010        PMID: 23616850      PMCID: PMC3633317          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2010-04-RA-0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  14 in total

Review 1.  Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.

Authors:  Danielle G T Arts; Nicolette F De Keizer; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Introduction/overview on clinical registries.

Authors:  D D Gladman; A Menter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment.

Authors:  J Raftery; P Roderick; A Stevens
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Integrated information systems for translational medicine.

Authors:  A Winter; G Funkat; A Haeber; C Mauz-Koerholz; K Pommerening; S Smers; J Stausberg
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Categorizing the world of registries.

Authors:  Brian C Drolet; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration.

Authors:  C Ohmann; W Kuchinke
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Registries for robust evidence.

Authors:  Nancy A Dreyer; Sarah Garner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Single source information systems to connect patient care and clinical research.

Authors:  Martin Dugas; Bernhard Breil; Volker Thiemann; Jens Lechtenbörger; Gottfried Vossen
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2009

9.  Systematic planning of clinical documentation.

Authors:  F Leiner; R Haux
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.176

10.  Registries: what level of evidence do they provide?

Authors:  Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-08-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Integrated image data and medical record management for rare disease registries. A general framework and its instantiation to theGerman Calciphylaxis Registry.

Authors:  Thomas M Deserno; Daniel Haak; Vincent Brandenburg; Verena Deserno; Christoph Classen; Paula Specht
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  [What can and cannot be achieved by registries : Perspective of the registry working group of the German Network of Health Services Research].

Authors:  E A M Neugebauer; J Stausberg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  The role of medical registries, potential applications and limitations.

Authors:  Bogdan Pop; Bogdan Fetica; Mihaiela Luminita Blaga; Adrian Pavel Trifa; Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu; Catalin Ioan Vlad; Andrei Achimas-Cadariu
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-01-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.