Easy and direct conversion of tosylates and mesylates into nitroalkanes.

Tosylates and mesylates were directly converted into the corresponding nitroalkanes, by their treatment with tetrabutylammonium nitrite (TBAN) under mild conditions.

Introduction

Nitroalkanes have proven to be one of the most valuable, versatile classes of substances in organic synthesis. In this sense, the chemical literature continuously reports progresses in their utilization for the preparation of a variety of target molecules, such as dyes, plastics, perfumes, pharmaceuticals and many natural products [1-7]. In fact, thanks to the high electron-withdrawing effect of the nitro group, nitroalkanes are prone to afford, under basic conditions, stabilized carbanions, which are commonly used as nucleophiles with a variety of electrophiles [8-11] leading to carbon–carbon bond formation. Furthermore, by making use of the possibility to transform the nitro group into other functionalities, the obtained adducts can be employed as strategic starting materials for the preparation of more complex structures [12-13]. In this context, primary nitroalkanes are the most used nitro derivatives [3-514-17], and thus, their availability is crucial. Although these molecules can be obtained from different sources [4], the displacement of alkyl halides with metal nitrite, thanks to the large number of commercially available halides, remains the most used, especially for the primary ones [18-23]. The classical reaction conditions require the usage of MNO2 (M = Na, K, Ag) in polar aprotic solvents (DMF, DMSO). Recently, owing to the importance of this transformation, new innovative and more eco-friendly procedures have been developed with success [24-27]. Unfortunately, despite the advantages introduced with these new methodologies, the usefulness of the reaction remains restricted to the use of alkyl halides, and the research of alternative sources is surely welcomed. In this regard, alcohols are a broad class of molecules easily available from both commercial sources and nature and, as a direct source for nitroalkanes, have unsuccessful been explored in the past [28]. In fact, the conversion of alcohols into nitroalkanes requires a three-step sequence, as reported in Figure 1, that necessitates [29-33] (i) conversion of alcohols a into their tosylates or mesylates b, (ii) transformation of b into the corresponding halo derivatives c (mainly iodide), and (iii) displacement of the halides by metal nitrite into the nitro compounds d.

Figure 1

Classical conversion of tosylate and mesylate into the corresponding nitroalkanes via halides.

However, although the first step (a into b) can be usually performed in quantitative yields, the main drawbacks, in terms of waste production and energy consumption, are in the two-step conversion of b into d.

Thus, an important advancement could be the development of an easy, direct and mild procedure for transforming tosylates and mesylates into the corresponding nitroalkanes. In fact, with the exception of a couple of examples reporting the conversion of 1-BuOTs [26] and homoallylic tosylates [34] into the corresponding nitro compounds, to the best of our knowledge, no general methods are available in literature.

Results and Discussion

Following our studies in the development of new processes for the preparation of nitroalkanes [24,27,35], we have now elaborated a general protocol for the direct transformation of aliphatic tosylates and mesylates into the corresponding nitro compounds. In order to optimize the reaction conditions we studied, as a test reaction, the conversion of tosylate 1a into nitropentadecane 2a (Table 1). As an initial trial we submitted 1a to the use of NaNO2 as the nitrating agent and DMF as the solvent. Under these conditions, we observed the formation of a mixture of products with traces of compound 2a. Thus, we switched our attention to a different class of nitrating agent, i.e., the commercially available tetrabutylammonium nitrite (TBAN). The application of 1.5 equiv of this compound in DMF produced 2a in 27% yield. With this result in our hand we tested both (i) different amounts of TBAN and (ii) different reaction media. As reported in Table 1, we obtained the best result (61% yield) using 1.5 equiv TBAN in toluene as the solvent (Table 1, entry 6).

Table 1

Optimization studies.

Entry	Nitrating agent	Solventa	Time (h)	Yield (%)b
1	NaNO2 (1.5 equiv)	DMF	6	traces
2	Bu4NNO2 (1.5 equiv)	DMF	6	27
3	Bu4NNO2 (1.5 equiv)	CPMEc	6	traces
4	Bu4NNO2 (1.5 equiv)	Et2O	6	traces
5	Bu4NNO2 (1.5 equiv)	DCM	24	24
6	Bu4NNO2 (1.5 equiv)	toluene	2.5	61
7	Bu4NNO2 (1.0 equiv)	toluene	5	45
8	Bu4NNO2 (2.0 equiv)	toluene	2.5	59

aUsed 4 mL/mmol. bYield of pure isolated product. cCyclopentyl methyl ether.

In order to verify the generality of our method we examined a variety of substrates and, as showed in Table 2, the procedure works well with a variety of primary substrates, including the functionalized ones giving access to a huge typology of primary nitroalkanes in 48–66% overall yields. Moreover the mildness of our reaction conditions permits the survival of important functionalities, such as cyano, ester, chlorine and (Z)-C–C double bond, giving easy access to polyfunctionalized nitroalkanes.

Table 2

Synthesis of primary nitroalkanes 2a–j.

Entry	R	R1	Product	Yield (%)a
1	CH3(CH2)13	Ts	2a	61
2	CH3(CH2)13	Ms	2a	55
3	CH3(CH2)8	Ts	2b	65
4	CH3(CH2)18	Ts	2c	66
5	CH3(CH2)5	Ts	2d	53
6	CH3(CH2)5	Ms	2d	50
7	PhCH2CH2	Ts	2e	58
8	PhCH2CH2	Ms	2e	53
9	CH2=CH(CH2)8	Ts	2f	60
10	Cl(CH2)5	Ts	2g	59
11	NC(CH2)4	Ts	2h	55
12	AcO(CH2)3	Ts	2i	48
13	(Z)-CH3(CH2)3CH=CHCH2	Ts	2j	57

aYield of pure isolated product.

Finally, we investigated our reaction conditions on secondary substrates, but, as reported in Table 3, the procedure is not general and, for the right substrates, the corresponding nitroalkanes 2k–n were isolated in lower yields and after longer reaction times with respect to the primary ones.

Table 3

Synthesis of secondary nitroalkanes 2k–n.

Entry	R	R1	Product	Yield (%)a (Time, h)
1	CH3CH2	CH3(CH2)5	2k	41 (28)
2	CH3	PhCH2CH2	2l	33 (39)
3	CH3	CH3(CH2)5	2m	<10 (37)
4	CH3(CH2)2	CH3(CH2)2	2n	<10 (40)

aYield of pure isolated product.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our method can be considered an important contribution for the preparation of nitroalkanes, making alcohols a strategic source for their availability. Moreover, the mildness of our reaction conditions permits the survival of important functionalities. Furthermore, our protocol presents an interesting peculiarity from the sustainability point of view, since (i) it overcomes the need to convert the alcohol derivatives (tosylates and mesylates) into halides, (ii) low-impacting solvents [36-37] such as toluene and methyl tert-butyl ether (work-up) were used, and (iii) any aqueous work-up was avoided, with evident restriction of waste production and energy consumption.

Experimental

General Information: Compounds 2a [38], 2b [24], 2c [15], 2d [25], 2e [39], 2f [24], 2g [40], 2h [40], 2i [24] and 2j [41] are known, and their spectroscopic data are in agreement with those reported in the literature. Compounds 1 were synthesized by Ghosh and Nicponski’s methodology [42]. 1H NMR was recorded at 400 MHz on a Varian Mercury Plus 400. 13C NMR was recorded at 100 MHz. Microanalyses were performed with a CHNS-O analyser Model EA 1108 from Fisons Instruments. Mass spectra were performed with a GC–MS system Agilent Technologies 6850 II/5973 Inert by means of the EI technique (70 eV). IR spectra were recorded with a Perkin-Elmer Paragon 500 FTIR.

General procedure for the conversion of tosylates and mesylates 1 into nitroalkanes 2. Tetrabutylammonium nitrite (TBAN, 433 mg, 1.5 mmol) was added, at room temperature, to a solution of the appropriate tosylate or mesylate 1 (1 mmol) in toluene (4 mL), and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2.5 h (for the reaction time of secondary tosylates, see Table 3). Once the reaction was completed, MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether, 5 mL) was added to the mixture with the formation of two phases. The solvent phase (upper phase) was carefully separated, while the other phase was treated with fresh MTBE (5 mL) and extracted under stirring for 10 min, then, the solvent phase was once again separated (the extraction process was repeated four times). Finally, the combined solution was concentrated under vacuum, to afford the crude product 2, which was purified by flash column chromatography (heptane/ethyl acetate).

Supporting Information

All synthesized products were characterized by IR, NMR, GC–MS and elementary analysis. The data is reported in Supporting Information File 1, while copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra are attached as Supporting Information File 2.

Spectroscopic data of synthesized compounds.

Copy of 1H and 13C NMR spectra of synthesized compounds.