Gary A Wu1, Kath M Bogie. 1. Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Abstract
STUDY AIM: Some individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) remain pressure ulcer (PU) free whilst others experience a recurring cycle of tissue breakdown. Detailed analysis of gluteal muscle characteristics may provide insights to local tissue viability variability. The study hypothesis was that SCI individuals have altered muscle composition compared to able-bodied (AB). MATERIALS: Ten AB and ten SCI received a supine pelvic CT scan, with contrast. METHODS: Cross-sectional area (CSA) and overall muscle volume were derived using image analysis. Gluteal muscle tissue type was classified at the S2/S3 sacral vertebrae midpoint, the superior greater trochanters margin (GT) and the inferior ischial tuberosities margin (IT) using the linear transformation Hounsfield Unit scale. RESULTS: SCI gluteal CSA was less than for AB throughout the muscle, with the greatest relative atrophy at the IT (48%). Average AB gluteal volume was nearly double SCI. Eight SCI had over 20% infiltrative adipose tissue, three with over 50%. SCI gluteal CSA and intramuscular fat infiltration were significantly negatively correlated (p < 0.05). SCI IT axial slices showed less lean muscle and higher intramuscular fat infiltration than more proximally (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SCI gluteal muscle characteristics were indicative of impaired tissue viability. SCI disuse muscle atrophy was anticipated; the analytic approach further indicated that intramuscular atrophy was not uniform. SCI muscle composition showed increased proportions of both low density muscle and adipose tissue. CT scan with contrast is effective for gluteal muscle characterization. This assessment technique may contribute to determination of personalized risk for PU development and other secondary complications. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
STUDY AIM: Some individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) remain pressure ulcer (PU) free whilst others experience a recurring cycle of tissue breakdown. Detailed analysis of gluteal muscle characteristics may provide insights to local tissue viability variability. The study hypothesis was that SCI individuals have altered muscle composition compared to able-bodied (AB). MATERIALS: Ten AB and ten SCI received a supine pelvic CT scan, with contrast. METHODS: Cross-sectional area (CSA) and overall muscle volume were derived using image analysis. Gluteal muscle tissue type was classified at the S2/S3 sacral vertebrae midpoint, the superior greater trochanters margin (GT) and the inferior ischial tuberosities margin (IT) using the linear transformation Hounsfield Unit scale. RESULTS: SCI gluteal CSA was less than for AB throughout the muscle, with the greatest relative atrophy at the IT (48%). Average AB gluteal volume was nearly double SCI. Eight SCI had over 20% infiltrative adipose tissue, three with over 50%. SCI gluteal CSA and intramuscular fat infiltration were significantly negatively correlated (p < 0.05). SCI IT axial slices showed less lean muscle and higher intramuscular fat infiltration than more proximally (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SCI gluteal muscle characteristics were indicative of impaired tissue viability. SCI disuse muscle atrophy was anticipated; the analytic approach further indicated that intramuscular atrophy was not uniform. SCI muscle composition showed increased proportions of both low density muscle and adipose tissue. CT scan with contrast is effective for gluteal muscle characterization. This assessment technique may contribute to determination of personalized risk for PU development and other secondary complications. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors: Andy Kin On Wong; Kayla Hummel; Cameron Moore; Karen A Beattie; Sami Shaker; B Catharine Craven; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou; Lora Giangregorio Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Sharon Gabison; Sunita Mathur; Ethne L Nussbaum; Milos R Popovic; Mary C Verrier Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Katie Schwartz; M Kristi Henzel; Mary Ann Richmond; Jennifer K Zindle; Jacinta M Seton; David P Lemmer; Nannette Alvarado; Kath M Bogie Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: J L Bramley; P R Worsley; D L Bader; C Everitt; A Darekar; L King; A S Dickinson Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 3.934