Literature DB >> 23615106

The Pipeline Embolization Device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration.

Pascal Jabbour1, Nohra Chalouhi, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, L Fernando Gonzalez, Aaron S Dumont, Ciro Randazzo, Robert M Starke, David Hasan, Rohan Chitale, Saurabh Singhal, Lea A Moukarzel, Robert Rosenwasser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has emerged as a promising treatment for intracranial aneurysms.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of the PED, to analyze the effect of operator experience on the complication rate, and to identify predictors of complications and obliteration.
METHODS: A total of 109 patients with 120 aneurysms were treated with PED at our institution. The patient population was divided into 3 consecutive equal groups to assess whether overall and major complication rates decreased over time: group 1, patients 1 through 37; group 2, patients 38 through 73; and group 3, patients 74 through 109.
RESULTS: The number of PEDs used was 1.40 per aneurysm. Symptomatic and major procedure-related complications occurred in 11% and 3.7% of patients, respectively. The rate of complications decreased from 16.2% in group 1 to 5.6% in group 3, and the rate of major complications fell dramatically from 10.8% in group 1 to 0% in groups 2 and 3 (P < .05). Procedure time significantly decreased over time (P = .04). In multivariate analysis, previously treated aneurysms were predictive of procedural complications (P = .02). At the latest follow-up, 65.8% of aneurysms were completely occluded, 9.6% were nearly completely occluded, and 24.6% were incompletely occluded. In multivariate analysis, fusiform aneurysms (P = .05) and shorter angiographic follow-up (P = .03) were negative predictors of aneurysm obliteration.
CONCLUSION: PED therapy may have an acceptable safety-efficacy profile. The risk of complications appears to decrease dramatically with physician experience, supporting the existence of a learning curve. Patients with previously treated aneurysms have higher complication rates, whereas fusiform aneurysms achieve lower obliteration rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23615106     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000429844.06955.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  30 in total

1.  Flow Diversion versus Standard Endovascular Techniques for the Treatment of Unruptured Carotid-Ophthalmic Aneurysms.

Authors:  F Di Maria; S Pistocchi; F Clarençon; B Bartolini; R Blanc; A Biondi; H Redjem; J Chiras; N Sourour; M Piotin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion following Pipeline Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Is It Less Effective in Older Patients?

Authors:  N Adeeb; J M Moore; M Wirtz; C J Griessenauer; P M Foreman; H Shallwani; R Gupta; A A Dmytriw; R Motiei-Langroudi; A Alturki; M R Harrigan; A H Siddiqui; E I Levy; A J Thomas; C S Ogilvy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Balloon sandwich technique for retrieval of fractured delivery wire of pipeline stent.

Authors:  Russell Cerejo; Mark Bain; Thomas Masaryk
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  The Collar Sign in Pipeline Embolization Device-Treated Aneurysms.

Authors:  Christopher J Moran
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Flow diversion of fusiform intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Andrew Griffin; Emily Lerner; Adam Zuchowski; Ali Zomorodi; L Fernando Gonzalez; Erik F Hauck
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  A single pipeline embolization device is sufficient for treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  N Chalouhi; S Tjoumakaris; J L H Phillips; R M Starke; D Hasan; C Wu; M Zanaty; D Kung; L F Gonzalez; R Rosenwasser; P Jabbour
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Blood Loss in Surgery for Aggressive Vertebral Haemangioma with and without Embolisation.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Reda Sheta; Konstantin Salci; Johan Willander
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-06-08

Review 8.  Endovascular management of cerebral aneurysm : review of the literature.

Authors:  Mario Zanaty; Nohra Chalouhi; Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris; Robert H Rosenwasser; Pascal M Jabbour
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Persistent aneurysm growth following pipeline embolization device assisted coiling of a fusiform vertebral artery aneurysm: a word of caution!

Authors:  Mena Kerolus; Manish K Kasliwal; Demetrius K Lopes
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2015-02-28

10.  Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  S R Boddu; F C Tong; S Dehkharghani; J E Dion; A M Saindane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.