Literature DB >> 23615026

Brain size and morphology of the brood-parasitic and cerophagous honeyguides (Aves: Piciformes).

Jeremy R Corfield1, Tim R Birkhead, Claire N Spottiswoode, Andrew N Iwaniuk, Neeltje J Boogert, Cristian Gutiérrez-Ibáñez, Sarah E Overington, Douglas R Wylie, Louis Lefebvre.   

Abstract

Honeyguides (Indicatoridae, Piciformes) are unique among birds in several respects. All subsist primarily on wax, are obligatory brood parasites and one species engages in 'guiding' behavior in which it leads human honey hunters to bees' nests. This unique life history has likely shaped the evolution of their brain size and morphology. Here, we test that hypothesis using comparative data on relative brain and brain region size of honeyguides and their relatives: woodpeckers, barbets and toucans. Honeyguides have significantly smaller relative brain volumes than all other piciform taxa. Volumetric measurements of the brain indicate that honeyguides have a significantly larger cerebellum and hippocampal formation (HF) than woodpeckers, the sister clade of the honeyguides, although the HF enlargement was not significant across all of our analyses. Cluster analyses also revealed that the overall composition of the brain and telencephalon differs greatly between honeyguides and woodpeckers. The relatively smaller brains of the honeyguides may be a consequence of brood parasitism and cerophagy ('wax eating'), both of which place energetic constraints on brain development and maintenance. The inconclusive results of our analyses of relative HF volume highlight some of the problems associated with comparative studies of the HF that require further study.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23615026     DOI: 10.1159/000348834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  6 in total

1.  Living in stable social groups is associated with reduced brain size in woodpeckers (Picidae).

Authors:  Natalia Fedorova; Cara L Evans; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Can we build a neuroecology of innovativeness similar to that pioneered by David Sherry for spatial memory?

Authors:  Louis Lefebvre; Jean-Nicolas Audet
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Problems with using comparative analyses of avian brain size to test hypotheses of cognitive evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca Hooper; Becky Brett; Alex Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  How Can We Study the Evolution of Animal Minds?

Authors:  Maxime Cauchoix; Alexis S Chaine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-15

5.  A quantitative analysis of cerebellar anatomy in birds.

Authors:  Felipe Cunha; Cristian Gutiérrez-Ibáñez; Kelsey Racicot; Douglas R Wylie; Andrew N Iwaniuk
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Diversity in olfactory bulb size in birds reflects allometry, ecology, and phylogeny.

Authors:  Jeremy R Corfield; Kasandra Price; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Cristian Gutierrez-Ibañez; Tim Birkhead; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.856

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.