Literature DB >> 23613676

ENCODE: A Sourcebook of Epigenomes and Chromatin Language.

Maryam Yavartanoo1, Jung Kyoon Choi.   

Abstract

Until recently, since the Human Genome Project, the general view has been that the majority of the human genome is composed of junk DNA and has little or no selective advantage to the organism. Now we know that this conclusion is an oversimplification. In April 2003, the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) launched an international research consortium called Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) to uncover non-coding functional elements in the human genome. The result of this project has identified a set of new DNA regulatory elements, based on novel relationships among chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, nucleosome positioning, DNA methylation, transcription, and the occupancy of sequence-specific factors. The project gives us new insights into the organization and regulation of the human genome and epigenome. Here, we sought to summarize particular aspects of the ENCODE project and highlight the features and data that have recently been released. At the end of this review, we have summarized a case study we conducted using the ENCODE epigenome data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ENCODE; chromatin; human genome; nucleosome positioning; regulatory elements

Year:  2013        PMID: 23613676      PMCID: PMC3630381          DOI: 10.5808/GI.2013.11.1.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics Inform        ISSN: 1598-866X


Introduction

The Human Genome Project was started in 1990 and completed by the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium in April 2003 [1]. Even though the human whole genome sequencing was one of the biggest achievements in human genetics, still more remains to be done. In September 2003, the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) launched an international research group called Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) to identify all functional regulatory regions across the entire human genome [2]. For this project, an international group of 442 members from 32 institutions studied 147 different types of cells with 24 types of different experiments (http://www.genome.gov/ENCODE) [3, 4]. The ENCODE project consists of a pilot and a technology development phase [5]. Methods used for the first phase were mainly chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and quantitative PCR. A set of regions, corresponding to 30,000 kilobases (~1% of whole human genome), have been targeted [6]. The studies highlighted the success on characterizing functional elements in the human genome and were published in June 2007 in Nature [6] and Genome Research [7]. In the second phase of this project, several new advanced technologies were employed to gain higher accuracy and increase coverage. The key technology was so-called next-generation sequencing. Many software tools were developed within the ENCODE project, such as Clustered Aggregation Tool (CAGT) [8]. This tool has been applied to the datasets of chromatin marks and transcription factors to generate a comprehensive archive of histone modifications and nucleosome positioning around transcription factor binding sites. On September 5, 2012, the results of the ENCODE studies were published in 30 papers in Nature, Genome Research, and Genome Biology to express 5 years of progress toward the goal of the project [9]. The subjects of the ENCODE project to date include: - Transcription factor motifs - Chromatin patterns at transcription factor binding sites - Characterization of intergenic regions and gene definition - RNA and chromatin modification patterns around promoters - Epigenetic regulation of RNA processing - Noncoding RNA characterization - DNA methylation patterns - Enhancer discovery and characterization - Three-dimensional connections across the genome - Characterization of network topology - Machine learning approaches to genomics - Impact of functional information on understanding variation - Impact of evolutionary selection on functional regions All ENCODE information and data are freely available for immediate use.

What Did the ENCODE Discover about the Genome?

Accessible (open) chromatin

Until recently, it was generally believed that 80% of human genome was noncoding or junk DNA [10] and regulatory regions located in close proximity of genes to be expressed. The ENCODE project estimated that 2.94% of the whole human genome was protein coding, while 80.4% of sequences governed how those genes are regulated [11]. Open chromatin regions (nucleosome-depleted regions that are sensitive to cleavage by the DNase I enzyme) have been widely used to identify active DNA regulatory elements, including promoters, enhancers, silencers, insulators, and locus control regions [12, 13]. Open chromatin has been mapped by two approaches. A total of 2.89 million DNase hypersensitive sites (DHSs) mapped by DNase I digestion, followed by next-generation sequencing in 125 cell types and 4.8 million sites across 25 cell types that exhibited reduced nucleosomal crosslinking, were mapped based on formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements assay [11]. On average, approximately 200,000 DHSs were found to be active in any one cell [14]. Open chromatin regions have different proportions, based on their genomic location, and they cover approximately 2% of the genome [15]. Open chromatin regions are enriched for regulatory information and located at or near transcription start sites [6].

DNA methylation and histone modification

The methylation status for the ENCODE cell lines has been obtained by three techniques: 1) sodium bisulfite conversion, 2) reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, and 3) methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme (methyl-seq). They profiled the DNA methylation status of over than one million CpG in all ENCODE cell lines and have provided quantitative determination of the proportion of CpG methylation at each site [5, 11, 16-18]. The result has added a lot to our present knowledge of cell-type selective patterns of methylation associated with genomic occupancy of transcriptions factors [17]. The ENCODE team has identified the specific patterns of post-translational histone modifications (e.g., H3K36me3, H3K27ac, and H3K27me3) by ChIP sequencing technique [6]. Then, histone modifications have been connected to the regulatory regions, such as promoters, enhancers, transcribe domains, and silenced regions [6, 11]. The maps of various histone modifications have been constructed genomewide in different cell lines.

Nucleosome positioning

In contrast to histone modifications, which are identified by ChIP-seq, nucleosome positioning data were generated without immunoprecipitation by using micrococcal nuclease digestion followed by sequencing [19-21]. The method that distinguishes nucleosome positioning is based on the ability of nucleosomes to protect related DNA from digestion by enzyme [22]. Protected fragments are sequenced to produce genomewide maps of nucleosome localization. By using a new tool, the ENCODE project has identified the differences in patterns of nucleosome positioning around the majority of transcription factor binding sites [8]. These data have tremendous value for analyzing the relationship between transcription factor binding, histone modifications, and gene expression regulation.

Transcription factors

Transcription factors can bind to DNA and alter the expression of genes [23]. The ENCODE Consortium has detected 45 million different events where transcription factors occupy DNA across 41 diverse cell types [16]. For this, high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) technology was applied to create occupancy maps for binding sites for a variety of DNA binding factors [5]. The architecture of the network of human transcription factors was found to be quite complex [24].

Annotation of the outputs of genomewide association studies

A large number of polymorphisms associated with increased risks of certain diseases or particular quantitative traits have been discovered by genomewide association studies. The identified genetic markers or risk variants, mostly composed of single nucleotide polymorphisms, were enriched within the genomic regions that were previously thought to be 'junk DNA' [11, 16, 17, 24-28]. The results of the ENCODE project have demonstrated that variants that fall in regulatory regions could indirectly influence coding genes linked to diseases or clinical traits. With the DHS map in hand, a research group studied more than 5,500 genome-wide association study (GWAS) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The result of their research revealed that approximately 75% of GWAS diseases- and trait-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). are concentrated in or near DNase I hypersensitive sites [29]. Together, they give new insights to the researchers who are carrying out GWASs.

A case epigenomic study based on the ENCODE data

All ENCODE data are freely available for download and analysis. The ENCODE website at the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) genome browser (http://encodeproject.org or http://genome.ucsc.edu/ENCODE) provides information about how to access the data. More than 100 researchers who were not part of the ENCODE project have used the ENCODE data for their studies. We had a question about the conflicts between the openness of transcription factor binding regions and the existence of histones for various modifications. Whereas regulatory DNA elements underlying open chromatin are made accessible by nucleosome-depleted states, the presence of nucleosomes is required for specific histone modifications that mediate the specific regulation of open chromatin regions [30]. To handle this question, we downloaded the data for chromatin accessibility (DHS), in vivo nucleosome occupancy, 15 chromatin states, histone modifications, and transcription factor binding sites for the GM12878 lymphoblastoid cell line from the ENCODE tracks of the UCSC genome browser. We discovered the presence of boundary nucleosomes just inside of open chromatin (black curve in Fig. 1A). In vivo nucleosomes that were reconstituted purely based on naked DNA [21, 31] also peaked right inside of open chromatin (gray shade in Fig. 1A). The corresponding DNA sequences displayed an increase in the C/G dinucleotide frequency (red dots in Fig. 1B) and a significant decrease in the A/T dinucleotide frequency (blue dots in Fig. 1B), exhibiting nucleosome-favoring features. However, there was a difference in the peak position between the in vivo and in vitro nucleosomes, indicating cellular reprogramming of sequence-encoded nucleosome positioning. The similar patterns were found in yeast (data not shown here). This evolutionarily conserved feature provides a platform for histone modifications associated with promoters and enhancers. We examined histone modification levels for the regulatory areas whose borders were occupied by DNA-encoded nucleosomes and those that were free of nucleosome sequences. Among 15 different chromatin states [30], active promoters, poised promoters, and strong enhancers tended to contain nucleosome-encoding sequences. Highest enrichment was found for poised promoters, and the lowest percentage was found with heterochromatin states. All these data indicate intrinsic nucleosome positioning present in the regulatory regions that are frequently accessed or poised for later activation but are not supposed to be silent. As with other ENCODE data users, the main goal of our study was to add a few more new directions to the ENCODE epigenetics road map.
Fig. 1

Sequenced-directed positioning of boundary nucleosome in open chromatin. (A) In vivo (black curve) and in vitro (gray shade) nucleosome occupancy across open chromatin in human GM12878 lymphoblastoid cell line. (B) Normalized frequencies of C/G and A/T dinucleotides across the boundaries of open chromatin.

Conclusion

The ENCODE project results have dramatically increased our knowledge about chromatin and its regulation. The results have forced us to think better about genetics. The ENCODE consortium has developed multiple technologies and approaches to discover the functional elements encoded in the human genome. This project generated more than 15 trillion bytes of raw data, mapping diverse chromatin properties in several cell types. Data generated by the ENCODE project are freely available and have been used by many researchers. By using the ENCODE data, we discovered the presence of boundary nucleosomes for specific histone modifications in open chromatin. Although the ENCODE project has provided a unique and informative window through which to view evolutionary change, it has looked only at 147 types of cells, and the human body has 1,000 cell types. The project is just the start of a long journey to understanding the mysteries of our genome.
  31 in total

1.  The end of "small science"?

Authors:  Bruce Alberts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project.

Authors:  Ewan Birney; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Anindya Dutta; Roderic Guigó; Thomas R Gingeras; Elliott H Margulies; Zhiping Weng; Michael Snyder; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Robert E Thurman; Michael S Kuehn; Christopher M Taylor; Shane Neph; Christoph M Koch; Saurabh Asthana; Ankit Malhotra; Ivan Adzhubei; Jason A Greenbaum; Robert M Andrews; Paul Flicek; Patrick J Boyle; Hua Cao; Nigel P Carter; Gayle K Clelland; Sean Davis; Nathan Day; Pawandeep Dhami; Shane C Dillon; Michael O Dorschner; Heike Fiegler; Paul G Giresi; Jeff Goldy; Michael Hawrylycz; Andrew Haydock; Richard Humbert; Keith D James; Brett E Johnson; Ericka M Johnson; Tristan T Frum; Elizabeth R Rosenzweig; Neerja Karnani; Kirsten Lee; Gregory C Lefebvre; Patrick A Navas; Fidencio Neri; Stephen C J Parker; Peter J Sabo; Richard Sandstrom; Anthony Shafer; David Vetrie; Molly Weaver; Sarah Wilcox; Man Yu; Francis S Collins; Job Dekker; Jason D Lieb; Thomas D Tullius; Gregory E Crawford; Shamil Sunyaev; William S Noble; Ian Dunham; France Denoeud; Alexandre Reymond; Philipp Kapranov; Joel Rozowsky; Deyou Zheng; Robert Castelo; Adam Frankish; Jennifer Harrow; Srinka Ghosh; Albin Sandelin; Ivo L Hofacker; Robert Baertsch; Damian Keefe; Sujit Dike; Jill Cheng; Heather A Hirsch; Edward A Sekinger; Julien Lagarde; Josep F Abril; Atif Shahab; Christoph Flamm; Claudia Fried; Jörg Hackermüller; Jana Hertel; Manja Lindemeyer; Kristin Missal; Andrea Tanzer; Stefan Washietl; Jan Korbel; Olof Emanuelsson; Jakob S Pedersen; Nancy Holroyd; Ruth Taylor; David Swarbreck; Nicholas Matthews; Mark C Dickson; Daryl J Thomas; Matthew T Weirauch; James Gilbert; Jorg Drenkow; Ian Bell; XiaoDong Zhao; K G Srinivasan; Wing-Kin Sung; Hong Sain Ooi; Kuo Ping Chiu; Sylvain Foissac; Tyler Alioto; Michael Brent; Lior Pachter; Michael L Tress; Alfonso Valencia; Siew Woh Choo; Chiou Yu Choo; Catherine Ucla; Caroline Manzano; Carine Wyss; Evelyn Cheung; Taane G Clark; James B Brown; Madhavan Ganesh; Sandeep Patel; Hari Tammana; Jacqueline Chrast; Charlotte N Henrichsen; Chikatoshi Kai; Jun Kawai; Ugrappa Nagalakshmi; Jiaqian Wu; Zheng Lian; Jin Lian; Peter Newburger; Xueqing Zhang; Peter Bickel; John S Mattick; Piero Carninci; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Sherman Weissman; Tim Hubbard; Richard M Myers; Jane Rogers; Peter F Stadler; Todd M Lowe; Chia-Lin Wei; Yijun Ruan; Kevin Struhl; Mark Gerstein; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Yutao Fu; Eric D Green; Ulaş Karaöz; Adam Siepel; James Taylor; Laura A Liefer; Kris A Wetterstrand; Peter J Good; Elise A Feingold; Mark S Guyer; Gregory M Cooper; George Asimenos; Colin N Dewey; Minmei Hou; Sergey Nikolaev; Juan I Montoya-Burgos; Ari Löytynoja; Simon Whelan; Fabio Pardi; Tim Massingham; Haiyan Huang; Nancy R Zhang; Ian Holmes; James C Mullikin; Abel Ureta-Vidal; Benedict Paten; Michael Seringhaus; Deanna Church; Kate Rosenbloom; W James Kent; Eric A Stone; Serafim Batzoglou; Nick Goldman; Ross C Hardison; David Haussler; Webb Miller; Arend Sidow; Nathan D Trinklein; Zhengdong D Zhang; Leah Barrera; Rhona Stuart; David C King; Adam Ameur; Stefan Enroth; Mark C Bieda; Jonghwan Kim; Akshay A Bhinge; Nan Jiang; Jun Liu; Fei Yao; Vinsensius B Vega; Charlie W H Lee; Patrick Ng; Atif Shahab; Annie Yang; Zarmik Moqtaderi; Zhou Zhu; Xiaoqin Xu; Sharon Squazzo; Matthew J Oberley; David Inman; Michael A Singer; Todd A Richmond; Kyle J Munn; Alvaro Rada-Iglesias; Ola Wallerman; Jan Komorowski; Joanna C Fowler; Phillippe Couttet; Alexander W Bruce; Oliver M Dovey; Peter D Ellis; Cordelia F Langford; David A Nix; Ghia Euskirchen; Stephen Hartman; Alexander E Urban; Peter Kraus; Sara Van Calcar; Nate Heintzman; Tae Hoon Kim; Kun Wang; Chunxu Qu; Gary Hon; Rosa Luna; Christopher K Glass; M Geoff Rosenfeld; Shelley Force Aldred; Sara J Cooper; Anason Halees; Jane M Lin; Hennady P Shulha; Xiaoling Zhang; Mousheng Xu; Jaafar N S Haidar; Yong Yu; Yijun Ruan; Vishwanath R Iyer; Roland D Green; Claes Wadelius; Peggy J Farnham; Bing Ren; Rachel A Harte; Angie S Hinrichs; Heather Trumbower; Hiram Clawson; Jennifer Hillman-Jackson; Ann S Zweig; Kayla Smith; Archana Thakkapallayil; Galt Barber; Robert M Kuhn; Donna Karolchik; Lluis Armengol; Christine P Bird; Paul I W de Bakker; Andrew D Kern; Nuria Lopez-Bigas; Joel D Martin; Barbara E Stranger; Abigail Woodroffe; Eugene Davydov; Antigone Dimas; Eduardo Eyras; Ingileif B Hallgrímsdóttir; Julian Huppert; Michael C Zody; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Xavier Estivill; Gerard G Bouffard; Xiaobin Guan; Nancy F Hansen; Jacquelyn R Idol; Valerie V B Maduro; Baishali Maskeri; Jennifer C McDowell; Morgan Park; Pamela J Thomas; Alice C Young; Robert W Blakesley; Donna M Muzny; Erica Sodergren; David A Wheeler; Kim C Worley; Huaiyang Jiang; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs; Tina Graves; Robert Fulton; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Michele Clamp; James Cuff; Sante Gnerre; David B Jaffe; Jean L Chang; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Eric S Lander; Maxim Koriabine; Mikhail Nefedov; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Yuko Yoshinaga; Baoli Zhu; Pieter J de Jong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data.

Authors:  Mark B Gerstein; Anshul Kundaje; Manoj Hariharan; Stephen G Landt; Koon-Kiu Yan; Chao Cheng; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Ekta Khurana; Joel Rozowsky; Roger Alexander; Renqiang Min; Pedro Alves; Alexej Abyzov; Nick Addleman; Nitin Bhardwaj; Alan P Boyle; Philip Cayting; Alexandra Charos; David Z Chen; Yong Cheng; Declan Clarke; Catharine Eastman; Ghia Euskirchen; Seth Frietze; Yao Fu; Jason Gertz; Fabian Grubert; Arif Harmanci; Preti Jain; Maya Kasowski; Phil Lacroute; Jing Jane Leng; Jin Lian; Hannah Monahan; Henriette O'Geen; Zhengqing Ouyang; E Christopher Partridge; Dorrelyn Patacsil; Florencia Pauli; Debasish Raha; Lucia Ramirez; Timothy E Reddy; Brian Reed; Minyi Shi; Teri Slifer; Jing Wang; Linfeng Wu; Xinqiong Yang; Kevin Y Yip; Gili Zilberman-Schapira; Serafim Batzoglou; Arend Sidow; Peggy J Farnham; Richard M Myers; Sherman M Weissman; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ubiquitous heterogeneity and asymmetry of the chromatin environment at regulatory elements.

Authors:  Anshul Kundaje; Sofia Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou; Max Libbrecht; Cheryl L Smith; Debasish Raha; Elliott E Winters; Steven M Johnson; Michael Snyder; Serafim Batzoglou; Arend Sidow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Linking disease associations with regulatory information in the human genome.

Authors:  Marc A Schaub; Alan P Boyle; Anshul Kundaje; Serafim Batzoglou; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Widespread plasticity in CTCF occupancy linked to DNA methylation.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Matthew T Maurano; Hongzhu Qu; Katherine E Varley; Jason Gertz; Florencia Pauli; Kristen Lee; Theresa Canfield; Molly Weaver; Richard Sandstrom; Robert E Thurman; Rajinder Kaul; Richard M Myers; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE).

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells.

Authors:  Anton Valouev; Steven M Johnson; Scott D Boyd; Cheryl L Smith; Andrew Z Fire; Arend Sidow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints.

Authors:  Shane Neph; Jeff Vierstra; Andrew B Stergachis; Alex P Reynolds; Eric Haugen; Benjamin Vernot; Robert E Thurman; Sam John; Richard Sandstrom; Audra K Johnson; Matthew T Maurano; Richard Humbert; Eric Rynes; Hao Wang; Shinny Vong; Kristen Lee; Daniel Bates; Morgan Diegel; Vaughn Roach; Douglas Dunn; Jun Neri; Anthony Schafer; R Scott Hansen; Tanya Kutyavin; Erika Giste; Molly Weaver; Theresa Canfield; Peter Sabo; Miaohua Zhang; Gayathri Balasundaram; Rachel Byron; Michael J MacCoss; Joshua M Akey; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Rajinder Kaul; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome.

Authors:  Robert E Thurman; Eric Rynes; Richard Humbert; Jeff Vierstra; Matthew T Maurano; Eric Haugen; Nathan C Sheffield; Andrew B Stergachis; Hao Wang; Benjamin Vernot; Kavita Garg; Sam John; Richard Sandstrom; Daniel Bates; Lisa Boatman; Theresa K Canfield; Morgan Diegel; Douglas Dunn; Abigail K Ebersol; Tristan Frum; Erika Giste; Audra K Johnson; Ericka M Johnson; Tanya Kutyavin; Bryan Lajoie; Bum-Kyu Lee; Kristen Lee; Darin London; Dimitra Lotakis; Shane Neph; Fidencio Neri; Eric D Nguyen; Hongzhu Qu; Alex P Reynolds; Vaughn Roach; Alexias Safi; Minerva E Sanchez; Amartya Sanyal; Anthony Shafer; Jeremy M Simon; Lingyun Song; Shinny Vong; Molly Weaver; Yongqi Yan; Zhancheng Zhang; Zhuzhu Zhang; Boris Lenhard; Muneesh Tewari; Michael O Dorschner; R Scott Hansen; Patrick A Navas; George Stamatoyannopoulos; Vishwanath R Iyer; Jason D Lieb; Shamil R Sunyaev; Joshua M Akey; Peter J Sabo; Rajinder Kaul; Terrence S Furey; Job Dekker; Gregory E Crawford; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Altered expression of LINC-ROR in cancer cell lines and tissues.

Authors:  Majdaddin Rezaei; Modjtaba Emadi-Baygi; Michèle J Hoffmann; Wolfgang A Schulz; Parvaneh Nikpour
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 2.  The MHC in the era of next-generation sequencing: Implications for bridging structure with function.

Authors:  Effie W Petersdorf; Colm O'hUigin
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.850

3.  Gal-2 Increases H3K4me3 and H3K9ac in Trophoblasts and Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Laura Hahn; Sarah Meister; Mareike Mannewitz; Susanne Beyer; Stefanie Corradini; Uwe Hasbargen; Sven Mahner; Udo Jeschke; Thomas Kolben; Alexander Burges
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-05-15

Review 4.  1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induced histone profiles guide discovery of VDR action sites.

Authors:  Mark B Meyer; Nancy A Benkusky; J Wesley Pike
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Rheumatoid arthritis-associated RBPJ polymorphism alters memory CD4+ T cells.

Authors:  William Orent; Allison R Mchenry; Deepak A Rao; Charles White; Hans-Ulrich Klein; Ribal Bassil; Gyan Srivastava; Joseph M Replogle; Towfique Raj; Michael Frangieh; Maria Cimpean; Nicole Cuerdon; Lori Chibnik; Samia J Khoury; Elizabeth W Karlson; Michael B Brenner; Philip De Jager; Elizabeth M Bradshaw; Wassim Elyaman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 6.  Epigenetics: relevance and implications for public health.

Authors:  Laura S Rozek; Dana C Dolinoy; Maureen A Sartor; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 7.  A New Gene Therapy Approach for Cardiovascular Disease by Non-coding RNAs Acting in the Nucleus.

Authors:  Tiia Husso; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala; Mikko P Turunen
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 10.183

8.  Common variants of NFE2L2 gene predisposes to acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Marialbert Acosta-Herrera; Maria Pino-Yanes; Jesús Blanco; Juan Carlos Ballesteros; Alfonso Ambrós; Almudena Corrales; Francisco Gandía; Carlés Subirá; David Domínguez; Aurora Baluja; José Manuel Añón; Ramón Adalia; Lina Pérez-Méndez; Carlos Flores; Jesus Villar
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Upregulation of adenylate cyclase 3 (ADCY3) increases the tumorigenic potential of cells by activating the CREB pathway.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Hong; Sung-Ho Goh; Sang Jin Lee; Jung-Ah Hwang; Jieun Lee; Il-Ju Choi; Hyehyun Seo; Jong-Hoon Park; Hiromu Suzuki; Eiichiro Yamamoto; In-Hoo Kim; Jin Sook Jeong; Mi Ha Ju; Dong-Hee Lee; Yeon-Su Lee
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2013-10

Review 10.  Chromatin without the 30-nm fiber: constrained disorder instead of hierarchical folding.

Authors:  Sergey V Razin; Alexey A Gavrilov
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.