Literature DB >> 23613508

Prevalence of anisometropia and its association with refractive error and amblyopia in preschool children.

Sonia Afsari1, Kathryn A Rose, Glen A Gole, Krupa Philip, Jody F Leone, Amanda French, Paul Mitchell.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the age and ethnicity-specific prevalence of anisometropia in Australian preschool-aged children and to assess in this population-based study the risk of anisometropia with increasing ametropia levels and risk of amblyopia with increasing anisometropia.
METHODS: A total 2090 children (aged 6-72 months) completed detailed eye examinations in the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study, including cycloplegic refraction, and were included. Refraction was measured using a Canon RK-F1 autorefractor, streak retinoscopy and/or the Retinomax K-Plus 2 autorefractor. Anisometropia was defined by the spherical equivalent (SE) difference, and plus cylinder difference for any cylindrical axis between eyes.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of SE and cylindrical anisometropia ≥1.0 D were 2.7% and 3.0%, for the overall sample and in children of European-Caucasian ethnicity, 3.2%, 1.9%; East-Asian 1.7%, 5.2%; South-Asian 2.5%, 3.6%; Middle-Eastern ethnicities 2.2%, 3.3%, respectively. Anisometropia prevalence was lower or similar to that in the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study, Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study and the Strabismus, Amblyopia and Refractive error in Singapore study. Risk (OR) of anisometropic amblyopia with ≥1.0 D of SE and cylindrical anisometropia was 12.4 (CI 4.0 to 38.4) and 6.5 (CI 2.3 to 18.7), respectively. We found an increasing risk of anisometropia with higher myopia ≥-1.0 D, OR 61.6 (CI 21.3 to 308), hyperopia > +2.0 D, OR 13.6 (CI 2.9 to 63.6) and astigmatism ≥1.5 D, OR 30.0 (CI 14.5 to 58.1).
CONCLUSIONS: In this preschool-age population-based sample, anisometropia was uncommon with inter-ethnic differences in cylindrical anisometropia prevalence. We also quantified the rising risk of amblyopia with increasing SE and cylindrical anisometropia, and present the specific levels of refractive error and associated increasing risk of anisometropia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child health (paediatrics); Epidemiology; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23613508     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  13 in total

1.  Tree shrews do not maintain emmetropia in initially-focused narrow-band cyan light.

Authors:  Thomas T Norton; Safal Khanal; Timothy J Gawne
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Refractive status of Chinese with laser-treated retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Lu Ruan; Hai-Dong Shan; Xing-Zong Liu; Xin Huang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Current Understanding of What Infants See.

Authors:  Lea Hyvärinen; Renate Walthes; Namita Jacob; Kay Nottingham Chaplin; Mercè Leonhardt
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2014

4.  Prevalence and association of refractive anisometropia with near work habits among young schoolchildren: The evidence from a population-based study.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Lee; Shao-You Fang; Der-Chong Tsai; Nicole Huang; Chih-Chien Hsu; Shing-Yi Chen; Allen Wen-Hsiang Chiu; Catherine Jui-Ling Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of a smartphone photoscreening app to detect refractive amblyopia risk factors in children aged 1-6 years.

Authors:  Robert W Arnold; James W O'Neil; Kim L Cooper; David I Silbert; Sean P Donahue
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-23

6.  Strabismus prevalence and associated factors among pediatric patients in southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bekalu Getahun Agaje; Demoze Delelegne; Elias Abera; Kindie Desta; Mikael Girum; Mulat Mossie; Daniel Eshetu; Agete Tadewos Hirigo
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  School-based epidemiology study of myopia in Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Jiaxing Wang; Ying Li; Zhenyang Zhao; Nan Wei; Xiaoli Qi; Gang Ding; Xue Li; Jing Li; Linlin Song; Ying Zhang; Richard Hyun Yi; Yuxian Ning; Xiaoyu Zeng; Ning Hua; Xuehan Qian
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  The biometric parameters of aniso-astigmatism and its risk factor in Chinese preschool children: the Nanjing eye study.

Authors:  Haohai Tong; Qingfeng Hao; Zijin Wang; Yue Wang; Rui Li; Xiaoyan Zhao; Qigang Sun; Xiaohan Zhang; Xuejuan Chen; Hui Zhu; Dan Huang; Hu Liu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Effects of stereopsis on vection, presence and cybersickness in head-mounted display (HMD) virtual reality.

Authors:  Wilson Luu; Barbara Zangerl; Michael Kalloniatis; Juno Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparative electrophysiological responses in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopic children.

Authors:  Luiz Cláudio Santos de Souza Lima; Adalmir Morterá Dantas; Guilherme Herzog Neto; Eduardo França Damasceno; Helena Parente Solari; Marcelo Palis Ventura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.