| Literature DB >> 23613150 |
Witold Reczyński1, Bożena Muszyńska, Włodzimierz Opoka, Agata Smalec, Katarzyna Sułkowska-Ziaja, Mirosław Malec.
Abstract
Cantharellus cibarius Fr. (chanterelle) and Boletus badius Pers. (bay bolete) harvested from natural sites in Poland were used to derive in vitro cultures. The optimal medium composition for cultures was developed. Concentrations of the chosen elements (Zn, Cu, Fe, Mg, Ni, and Cd) in mycelium samples were measured by means of atomic absorption spectrometry. Fe concentration in the analyzed mushroom materials was in the range 215.4-680.3 μg/g dry weight. Mean values of Mg were respectively (in micrograms per gram dry weight) 541.8 for mycelium of C. cibarius cultured in vitro and 1,004.1 for C. cibarius fruiting bodies and 928.9 for the mycelium of B. badius cultured in vitro and 906.4 for B. badius fruiting bodies. The mean concentrations of Zn were 442.7 μg/g dry weight in mycelium from in vitro cultures of B. badius and 172.1 in B. badius fruiting bodies and 131.9 in the case of C. cibarius in mycelium from in vitro cultures and 95.5 for the C. cibarius fruiting bodies. Cu exhibited a reversal tendency, i.e., the element concentrations in naturally grown mushrooms were significantly higher (43.57 μg/g dry weight for C. cibarius and 43.54 μg/g for B. badius) than in cultured in vitro mycelium (12.47 μg/g for C. cibarius and 4.17 μg/g for B. badius). Ni was found in lowest concentrations ranging from 0.33 to 1.88 μg/g dry weight. Toxic metal Cd was found in relatively high concentrations in naturally grown species (0.79 μg/g dry weight-1.02). The lowest was the concentration of Cd in C. cibarius mycelium from in vitro culture-0.06 μg/g dry weight-a bit higher than it was in the B. badius mycelium (0.21 μg/g).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23613150 PMCID: PMC3667370 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-013-9670-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res ISSN: 0163-4984 Impact factor: 3.738
Optimized analytical conditions of graphite furnace operation
| Stage/element | Ni | Cd |
|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment temperature (°C) | 1,400 | 600 |
| Atomization temperature (°C) | 2,500 | 1,600 |
Concentration of micronutrients in in vitro cultures and in fruiting bodies of C. cibarius and B. badius
| Sample | Zn (μg/g dry weight) | Cu (μg/g dry weight) | Fe (μg/g dry weight) | Mg (μg/g dry weight) | Ni (μg/g dry weight) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ccm 1 | 134.30 ± 7.21* | 24.56 ± 0.40 | 694.5 ± 11.30* | 541.5 ± 5.34 | 0.31 ± 0.05 |
| ccm 2 | 139.40 ± 1.13 | 20.02 ± 0.66 | 650.7 ± 6.10 | 608.5 ± 1.08 | 0.15 ± 0.03 |
| ccm 3 | 112.65 ± 0.07** | 8.00 ± 0.08** | 414.0 ± 0.61** | 453.0 ± 4.17 | 0.10 ± 0.01 |
| ccm 4 | 126.25 ±1.06 | 3.72 ± 0.28** | 395.0 ± 16.22* | 440.5 ± 1.67 | 0.67 ± 0.02 |
| ccm 5 | 169.05 ± 0.49* | 5.16 ± 0.16** | 296.6 ± 0.41** | 474.5 ± 3.91 | 0.64 ± 0.02** |
| ccm 6 | 109.95 ± 0.64* | 13.38 ± 0.17* | 296.6 ± 0.50** | 733.0 ± 2.56* | 0.15 ± 0.04 |
| cco 7 | 106.05 ± 2.76** | 46.58 ± 0.61 | 72.9 ± 58.30 | 1,055.0 ± 5.34 | 2.28 ± 0.06 |
| cco 8 | 103.75 ± 3.32* | 45.54 ± 0.86 | 587.3 ± 33.13 | 1,050.0 ± 3.92 | 2.09 ± 0.01* |
| cco 9 | 92.16 ± 1.86* | 40.67 ± 1.53 | 404.3 ± 8.30 | 971.0 ± 2.19 | 1.72 ± 0.08 |
| cco 10 | 82.34 ± 0.61* | 40.70 ± 0.49 | 303.5 ± 7.61 | 993.5 ± 5.33 | 1.98 ± 0.06* |
| cco 11 | 102.32 ± 10.73 | 48.78 ± 0.13 | 307.1 ± 46.00 | 1,060.0 ± 2.32 | 1.61 ± 0.06 |
| cco 12 | 86.11 ± 0.53 | 39.17 ± 3.39* | 438.9 ± 57.82 | 895.0 ± 2.24 | 1.61 ± 0.05 |
| bbm 13 | 711.85 ± 37.69* | 3.53 ± 0.02* | 423.4 ± 9.11 | 947.0 ± 3.95** | 0.19 ± 0.02* |
| bbm 14 | 254.25 ± 12.01* | 5.53 ± 0.00* | 672.0 ± 44.30 | 840.0 ± 5.34** | 1.26 ± 0.09 |
| bbm 15 | 468.95 ± 12.94* | 4.17 ± 0.32* | 1,486.0 ± 12.35* | 1,013.0 ± 2.31* | 1.06 ± 0.07 |
| bbm 16 | 555.40 ± 22.34* | 2.47 ± 0.00 | 386.4 ± 6.21 | 1,085.0 ± 6.82** | 0.09 ± 0.02* |
| bbm 17 | 277.60 ± 5.66 | 5.08 ± 0.13* | 657.6 ± 7.41 | 842.0 ± 11.90 | 0.95 ± 0.05 |
| bbm 18 | 388.15 ± 53.09 | 4.24 ± 1.65 | 535.5 ± 35.90 | 846.5 ± 6.64 | 0.19 ± 0.03 |
| bbo 19 | 219.60 ± 8.63 | 59.91 ± 1.58** | 457.1 ± 3.22** | 994.0 ± 9.02 | 0.39 ± 0.03 |
| bbo 20 | 193.05 ± 2.47* | 35.15 ± 0.69 | 136.0 ± 0.50 | 925.5 ± 8.86* | 0.22 ± 0.03 |
| bbo 21 | 137.60 ± 3.61** | 40.80 ± 0.08** | 215.4 ± 6.60** | 795.5 ± 3.04* | 0.33 ± 0.03 |
| bbo 22 | 166.05 ± 5.57 | 51.94 ± 1.63** | 245.9 ± 15.60** | 1,005.0 ± 8.24* | 0.50 ± 0.04 |
| bbo 23 | 150.50 ± 9.76* | 38.56 ± 0.19* | 253.6 ± 11.11** | 906.0 ± 6.41 | 0.10 ± 0.01 |
| bbo 24 | 165.70 ± 7.92* | 34.91 ± 0.03 | 232.5 ± 1.11** | 812.5 ± 7.80* | 0.57 ± 0.02* |
Data were presented as the mean ± SD; n = 4 repetitions
ccm C. cibarius mycelium from in vitro cultures, cco C. cibarius fruiting bodies, bbm B. badius mycelium from in vitro cultures, bbo B. badius fruiting bodies
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by Statistica 10 (StatSoft, Poland)
Concentration of cadmium in in vitro cultures and in fruiting bodies of C. cibarius and B. badius
| Sample | Cd (μg/g dry weight) |
|---|---|
| ccm 1 | 0.04 ± 0.005* |
| ccm 2 | 0.04 ± 0.002 |
| ccm 3 | 0.04 ± 0.003 |
| ccm 4 | 0.12 ± 0.021 |
| ccm 5 | 0.08 ± 0.002* |
| ccm 6 | 0.04 ± 0.002 |
| cco 7 | 0.73 ± 0.032 |
| cco 8 | 0.95 ± 0.073 |
| cco 9 | 0.70 ± 0.017 |
| cco 10 | 0.822 ± 0.043 |
| cco 11 | 0.77 ± 0.069 |
| cco 12 | 0.77 ± 0.029 |
| bbm 13 | 0.14 ± 0.004** |
| bbm 14 | 0.19 ± 0.002** |
| bbm 15 | 0.52 ± 0.005** |
| bbm 16 | 0.11 ± 0.004** |
| bbm 17 | 0.18 ± 0.005 |
| bbm 18 | 0.15 ± 0.011 |
| bbo 19 | 1.53 ± 0.041** |
| bbo 20 | 0.41 ± 0.007 |
| bbo 21 | 1.49 ± 0.034** |
| bbo 22 | 1.31 ± 0.101* |
| bbo 23 | 0.69 ± 0.045 |
| bbo 24 | 0.67 ± 0.023** |
Data were presented as the mean ± SD; n = 4 repetitions
ccm C. cibarius mycelium from in vitro cultures, cco C. cibarius fruiting bodies, bbm B. badius mycelium from in vitro cultures, bbo B. badius fruiting bodies
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by Statistica 10 (StatSoft, Poland)
Elements concentration rates
| Medium | Mycelium from in vitro cultures of | Mycelium from in vitro cultures of | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mg:Fe | 4.5 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| Zn:Cu | 11.0 | 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Mg:Zn | 40.2 | 4.1 | 2.1 |
| Fe:Zn | 8.9 | 3.5 | 1.3 |
Elements concentrations in in vitro culture medium and soil from the place in which the fruiting bodies were collected
| Element | Mg (μg/g dry weight) | Fe (μg/g dry weight) | Zn (μg/g dry weight) | Cu (μg/g dry weight) | Ni (μg/g dry weight) | Cd (μg/g dry weight) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | 4.42 ± 0.05 | 0.98 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.002 | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.001 ± 0.0001 |
| Soil | 2,083.30 ± 0.50 | 6,720.3 ± 0.70 | 53.23 ± 5.21 | 17.3 ± 0.71 | 5.13 ± 5.80 | 0.44 ± 0.49 |
Data were presented as the mean ± SD; n = 4 repetitions. Significant differences was tested at p ≤ 0.05 by Statistica 10 (StatSoft, Poland)
Fig. 1Cluster analysis of the mycelium from in vitro cultures and fruiting bodies of mushrooms (the Euclidean distance square, Ward’s algorithm; bbm—B. badius mycelium from in vitro cultures, bbo—B. badius fruiting bodies, ccm—C. cibarius mycelium from in vitro cultures, cco—C. cibarius fruiting bodies)
Table of component weights
| Component 1 | Component 2 | Component 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zn | 0.305729 | 0.503537 | −0.552023 |
| Cu | −0.568130 | −0.120129 | −0.009330 |
| Fe | 0.205245 | 0.530955 | 0.520284 |
| Mg | −0.365023 | 0.555131 | −0.348414 |
| Ni | −0.349652 | 0.376696 | 0.511837 |
| Cd | −0.534915 | −0.005941 | −0.202777 |
Fig. 2Analyzed components in three-dimensional data space (bbm—B. badius mycelium from in vitro cultures, bbo—B. badius fruiting bodies, ccm—C. cibarius mycelium from in vitro cultures, cco—C. cibarius fruiting bodies)
Fig. 3Biplot graph creates a three-dimensional space (created on the basis of three main components; bbm—B. badius mycelium from in vitro cultures, bbo—B. badius fruiting bodies, ccm—C. cibarius mycelium from in vitro cultures, cco—C. cibarius fruiting bodies)