Literature DB >> 23612954

Classic and reversal steps stapedotomy performed with CO2 laser: a comparative analysis.

Francesco Freni1, Valentina Katia Mannella, Giovanni Cammaroto, Carmela Azielli, Carmen Cappuccio, Francesco Galletti.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate and compare hearing outcomes, intraoperative and postoperative complications and tinnitus characteristics, with particular regard to the effects of stapes surgery on the course of tinnitus. Two groups were evaluated: one group of patients were treated with classical stapedotomy and the second group was composed of patients who underwent reversal technique. Eighty-four patients aged between 22 and 62 years with otosclerosis were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 49, 17 male, mean age 38, patients treated with classic stapedotomy) and group 2 (n = 35, 13 male, mean age 40, patients treated with reversal stapedotomy). Classical and reversal stapedotomy techniques were performed using CO2 laser; self-crimping titanium piston prosthesis were positioned in patients treated with reversal stapedotomy and classical stapedotomy. Preoperative and postoperative audiometric evaluation using pure tone audiometry (air-bone gap (ABG), bone-conduction thresholds and air-conduction thresholds). Tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) scale and intraoperative/postoperative complications were assessed in both groups. Wilcoxon's test and Friedman's test followed by post hoc analysis were used. There were no statistically significant differences in ABG, air conduction, bone conduction, and THI score variations after surgery between the two groups. Complications in both groups were not significant, and different. In conclusion, reversal and classic stapedotomies performed with CO2 laser can be considered efficient, safe and reliable techniques considering the hearing outcomes and complications recorded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23612954     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2500-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  38 in total

1.  General history of stapedectomy.

Authors:  Rudolf Häusler
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007

2.  Reversal of the steps stapedotomy technique with early removal of the posterior crus: early postoperative results: how we do it.

Authors:  F Fiorino; F Barbieri
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  The effect of stapedotomy on tinnitus in patients with otospongiosis.

Authors:  Adriana da Silva Lima; Tanit Ganz Sanchez; Renata Marcondes; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.697

4.  Poststapedectomy incus necrosis.

Authors:  J H Aroesty; F E Lucente; G Har-El
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Long-term results after stapedectomy versus stapedotomy.

Authors:  R Kürsten; B Schneider; M Zrunek
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-11

6.  [Otosclerosis surgery: a series of 227 cases. Introduction of CO2 laser].

Authors:  E Lescanne; A Robier; C Soin; A Manceau; A Benlyazid; P Beutter
Journal:  Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac       Date:  1999-04

7.  Long-term follow-up of tinnitus in patients with otosclerosis after stapes surgery.

Authors:  Pollyanna G Sobrinho; Carlos A Oliveira; Alessandra R Venosa
Journal:  Int Tinnitus J       Date:  2004

8.  [Complications of three methods of stapedectomy].

Authors:  W Gołabek; M Szymański; H Siwiec; A Kłos
Journal:  Otolaryngol Pol       Date:  2001

9.  Gold and titanium in the oval window: a comparison of two metal stapes prostheses.

Authors:  Rinze A Tange; Wilko Grolman; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  [The use of CO2 laser in stapes surgery].

Authors:  Marcin Szymański
Journal:  Otolaryngol Pol       Date:  2007
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Surgical Nuances and Outcomes of the Reverse Stapedotomy.

Authors:  Anup Singh; David Victor Kumar Irugu; Rajeev Kumar; Hitesh Verma
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.