| Literature DB >> 23611909 |
Steven J Hersch1, Mengchi Wang, S Betty Zou, Kyung-Mee Moon, Leonard J Foster, Michael Ibba, William Wiley Navarre.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Elongation factor P (EF-P) is a universally conserved bacterial translation factor homologous to eukaryotic/archaeal initiation factor 5A. In Salmonella, deletion of the efp gene results in pleiotropic phenotypes, including increased susceptibility to numerous cellular stressors. Only a limited number of proteins are affected by the loss of EF-P, and it has recently been determined that EF-P plays a critical role in rescuing ribosomes stalled at PPP and PPG peptide sequences. Here we present an unbiased in vivo investigation of the specific targets of EF-P by employing stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) to compare the proteomes of wild-type and efp mutant Salmonella. We found that metabolic and motility genes are prominent among the subset of proteins with decreased production in the Δefp mutant. Furthermore, particular tripeptide motifs are statistically overrepresented among the proteins downregulated in efp mutant strains. These include both PPP and PPG but also additional motifs, such as APP and YIRYIR, which were confirmed to induce EF-P dependence by a translational fusion assay. Notably, we found that many proteins containing polyproline motifs are not misregulated in an EF-P-deficient background, suggesting that the factors that govern EF-P-mediated regulation are complex. Finally, we analyzed the specific region of the PoxB protein that is modulated by EF-P and found that mutation of any residue within a specific GSCGPG sequence eliminates the requirement for EF-P. This work expands the known repertoire of EF-P target motifs and implicates factors beyond polyproline motifs that are required for EF-P-mediated regulation. IMPORTANCE: Bacterial cells regulate gene expression at several points during and after transcription. During protein synthesis, for example, factors can interact with the ribosome to influence the production of specific proteins. Bacterial elongation factor P (EF-P) is a protein that facilitates the synthesis of proteins that contain polyproline motifs by preventing the ribosome from stalling. Bacterial cells that lack EF-P are viable but are sensitive to a large number of stress conditions. In this study, a global analysis of protein synthesis revealed that EF-P regulates many more proteins in the cell than predicted based solely on the prevalence of polyproline motifs. Several new EF-P-regulated motifs were uncovered, thereby providing a more complete picture of how this critical factor influences the cell's response to stress at the level of protein synthesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23611909 PMCID: PMC3638311 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00180-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1 A subset of proteins is significantly misregulated in Δefp Salmonella. The histogram outlines the distribution of protein synthesis ratios identified in SILAC. Columns indicate the number of proteins with an average synthesis ratio between two neighboring x axis values. Underlined values in the x axis indicate a change in scale. The inset table shows the number of SILAC hits demonstrating a greater than 2-fold difference in protein level between the efp+ (WN1269) and ∆efp (WN1308) strains. The second column further indicates the proteins with a significance B value of less than 0.01 in at least one trial. “Total” indicates the number of proteins identified in at least one replicate regardless of expression ratio, and the second column of this row includes proteins with any expression ratio that had a significance B value of less than 0.01 in at least one trial. Synthesis ratios shown are the average normalized heavy/light ratios of three biological replicates.
Bioinformatic analysis predicts EF-P-regulated tripeptide motifs[]
| Motif | Occhigh | Exphigh | Occmid | Expmid | Occlow | Explow | Enrichhigh | Enrichlow | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPP | 18 | 4.96 | 15 | 29.1 | 0 | 3.16 | 4.09 | 0.00 | 2.1E−10 |
| PPG | 28 | 8.48 | 26 | 49.7 | 1 | 5.40 | 3.82 | 0.21 | 5.6E−14 |
| APP | 18 | 11.1 | 22 | 65.1 | 0 | 7.07 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 7.6E−10 |
| RME | 12 | 5.30 | 16 | 31.1 | 2 | 3.38 | 3.00 | 0.79 | 1.3E−04 |
| YIR | 10 | 4.64 | 14 | 27.2 | 1 | 2.96 | 3.00 | 0.47 | 4.7E−04 |
| TQM | 11 | 3.64 | 17 | 21.4 | 0 | 2.32 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 1.4E−04 |
| PFF | 10 | 2.84 | 15 | 16.6 | 2 | 1.81 | 2.78 | 0.87 | 7.4E−05 |
| DPP | 5 | 6.73 | 8 | 39.4 | 1 | 4.29 | 2.68 | 0.84 | 2.0E−07 |
| FFL | 5 | 6.15 | 8 | 36.1 | 1 | 3.92 | 2.68 | 0.84 | 1.4E−06 |
| QNA | 22 | 10.0 | 43 | 58.8 | 5 | 6.39 | 2.36 | 0.84 | 3.0E−05 |
Prevalence among the SILAC hits of all possible tripeptide combinations of the 20 common amino acids. Occ, motif occurrences in the indicated subgroup of the SILAC data; Exp, expected motif occurrences in the indicated subgroup based on amino acid prevalence; Enrich, calculated motif enrichment index in the indicated subgroup of the SILAC data; high, low, and mid, subgroups of SILAC data encompassing the 10% of proteins with the highest (high) or lowest (low) WN1269/WN1308 ratios; “mid” incorporates the remaining 80%.
Motifs shown are those that demonstrated the greatest enrichment index within the 10% of proteins most downregulated in the efp mutant (highest WN1269/WN1308 ratio).
P values were calculated using the chi-square test with Yates’ correction as described in Materials and Methods.
Verification of predicted EF-P-dependent motifs[]
| Motif | GFP fluorescence |
|---|---|
| Null | 0.95 ± 0.09 |
| PPPPPP0[ | 20.68 ± 0.38 |
| PPPPPP1[ | 18.55 ± 0.38 |
| PPPPPP2[ | 18.12 ± 0.20 |
| PPPPPP3[ | 15.97 ± 0.08 |
| PPP | 4.72 ± 0.23 |
| PPG | 10.39 ± 0.66 |
| APP | 5.88 ± 0.20 |
| RME | 1.34 ± 0.07 |
| YIR | 0.96 ± 0.13 |
| YIRYIR | 7.61 ± 2.54 |
| PFF | 1.58 ± 0.19 |
Motifs were assayed for EF-P dependence by insertion into the 4th codon position of GFP.
Values at 21 h postinduction were normalized to cotranscriptionally expressed mCherry and are shown as a ratio of wild-type and efp mutant strains expressing the same construct. All values are the averages ± standard deviations for three biological replicates
No motif inserted into GFP.
Sequence of six optimal (CCG; 0) or random (1 to 3) proline codons.
FIG 2 Comparison of proteins identified in SILAC and those with EF-P target motifs. (A) Venn diagram outlining the overlap of: proteins conclusively identified in SILAC, proteins significantly downregulated in WN1308, and proteins containing a PPP, PPG, or APP motif as annotated in the Salmonella serovar Typhimurium strain SL1344 genome (GenBank accession no. FQ312003.1). (B) DAVID analysis of SILAC hits showing a decreased protein level in the ∆efp strain (ratio > 2) and a significance B score of less than 0.01 in at least one trial. Functional annotation clusters showing significant overrepresentation (P value < 0.05) are shown. Cluster breakdown can be found in Table S4 in the supplemental material. (C) DAVID analysis showing the most significantly overrepresented clusters among the 422 proteins that contain an EF-P target motif. For clarity, only groups with P values < 0.001 are shown here. For a full list, see Table S5. (D) DAVID analysis showing the only significantly overrepresented cluster (P value < 0.05) among the 20 proteins that fall into all three categories (contain an EF-P target motif and were significantly downregulated in the ∆efp strain in SILAC). Cluster breakdown can be found in Table S6 in the supplemental material.
FIG 3 The GSCGPG motif of PoxB renders it dependent on EF-P. (A) Outline of translational fusion constructs expressing full-length (FL) PoxB or C-terminal truncations fused to sfGFP. Construct designations are shown in bold at left as a figure key and indicate the length in codons of each truncated poxB gene. The arrow indicates the transcriptional start site under the control of the PLtet0-1 constitutively active promoter, and “fMet” indicates the ATG start codon of PoxB. Numbers indicate poxB lengths in codons. For clarity, only a selection of constructs is illustrated. (B) Sequence of amino acids 69 to 82 of PoxB. The GSCGPG motif is bold and underlined. (C) Relative GFP fluorescence of PoxB truncations. Values were taken at 10 h postinoculation, were normalized to the optical density at 600 nm (OD600), and are shown relative to those of the wild-type strain expressing the same construct. The same plasmid encoding the first 186 codons of lacZ instead of poxB is included as a control. (D) Relative GFP fluorescence (as in panel C) for single-residue mutations to leucine in the full-length PoxB construct. All values are the averages for at least 3 biological replicates. Each error bar shows 1 standard deviation.