Literature DB >> 23611838

Effect of technique on postoperative perineal wound infections in abdominoperineal resection.

Shayna L Showalter1, Rachel R Kelz, Najjia N Mahmoud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perineal wound infection (PWI) after abdominoperineal resection causes a burden for patients and health systems. We sought to determine the effect of patient positioning on the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent APR in our hospital system over a 10-year period. Univariate analysis was performed to identify characteristics associated with position and PWI. A logistic model was developed to assess the relationship of position and PWI, with adjustment for confounders.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar for the prone and lithotomy positions. Operative time was less for the prone than for the lithotomy position. The prone position was associated with a reduced risk of PWI. After adjustment for potential confounders, the prone position remained significantly associated with a reduction in PWI.
CONCLUSIONS: Positioning patients in the prone position results in a lower occurrence of postoperative PWI and shorter operative time. We advocate this technique for most indications of APR.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23611838     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Perioperative and oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection in the prone position vs the classic lithotomy position: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jose Wilson B Mesquita-Neto; Hassan Mouzaihem; Francisco Igor B Macedo; Lance K Heilbrun; Donald W Weaver; Steve Kim
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  The application of incisional negative pressure wound therapy for perineal wounds: A systematic review.

Authors:  Caitlin Cahill; Amanda Fowler; Lara J Williams
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Haidong Bao; Xianbin Zhang; Jian Zhang; Li Ma; Yulin Wang; Chunyan Li; Zhongyu Wang; Peng Gong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 4.  Local Application of Gentamicin in the Prophylaxis of Perineal Wound Infection After Abdominoperineal Resection: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  G D Musters; J W A Burger; C J Buskens; W A Bemelman; P J Tanis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Short-term Outcomes of an Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection in the Prone Position Compared With a Conventional Abdominoperineal Resection for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: The Early Experience at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Seungwan Park; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 6.  Prolonged Operative Duration Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Brian Po-Han Chen; Ireena M Soleas; Nicole C Ferko; Chris G Cameron; Piet Hinoul
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2017 Aug/Sep       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Subtotal colectomy in ulcerative colitis-long term considerations for the rectal stump.

Authors:  Orla Hennessy; Laurence Egan; Myles Joyce
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.