Literature DB >> 23611386

A comparative study of biofilm removal with hand, rotary nickel-titanium, and self-adjusting file instrumentation using a novel in vitro biofilm model.

James Lin1, Ya Shen, Markus Haapasalo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to present a standardized biofilm model in extracted teeth with an artificial apical groove to quantify the efficacy of hand, rotary nickel-titanium, and self-adjusting file (SAF) instrumentation in biofilm bacteria removal.
METHODS: Thirty-six extracted single-rooted teeth with oblong canals were selected. Each tooth was split longitudinally, and a 0.2-mm-wide groove was placed in the apical 2 to 5 mm of the canal. After growing mixed bacteria biofilm inside the canal under an anaerobic condition, the split halves were reassembled in a custom block, creating an apical vapor lock. Teeth were randomly divided into 3 treatment groups (n = 10 per group) using the K-file, ProFile (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Products, Tulsa, OK), and the SAF (ReDent-Nova, Ra'anana, Israel). Irrigation consisted of 10 mL 3% NaOCl and 4 mL 17% EDTA. Six teeth received no treatment. Areas inside and outside the groove were examined using a scanning electron microscope.
RESULTS: The scanning electron microscope showed a consistently thick layer of biofilm grown in the canals of the control group after 4 weeks. Within the groove, a smaller area remained occupied by bacteria after the use of the SAF compared with the ProFile and the K-file (3.25%, 19.25%, and 26.98%, respectively; P < .05). For all groups, significantly more bacteria were removed outside the groove than inside (P < .05). No statistical differences were found outside the groove (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although all techniques equally removed bacteria outside the groove, the SAF reduced significantly more bacteria within the apical groove. No technique was able to remove all bacteria. This biofilm model represents a potentially useful tool for the future study of root canal disinfection.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23611386     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  8 in total

1.  Impact of agitation/activation strategies on the antibiofilm potential of sodium hypochlorite/etidronate mixture in vitro.

Authors:  Ming Cai; Yanling Cai; Ruiqi Yang; Zhezhen Xu; Prasanna Neelakantan; Xi Wei
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Preclinical Testing of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes for Root Canal Disinfection-A Series of Preliminary Studies.

Authors:  Maximilian Koch; Victor Palarie; Lisa Koch; Andreas Burkovski; Manuel Zulla; Stefan Rosiwal; Matthias Karl
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 3.  The self-adjusting file (SAF) system: An evidence-based update.

Authors:  Zvi Metzger
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  Biofilms in Endodontics-Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Prasanna Neelakantan; Monica Romero; Jorge Vera; Umer Daood; Asad U Khan; Aixin Yan; Gary Shun Pan Cheung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Phage therapy against Enterococcus faecalis in dental root canals.

Authors:  Leron Khalifa; Mor Shlezinger; Shaul Beyth; Yael Houri-Haddad; Shunit Coppenhagen-Glazer; Nurit Beyth; Ronen Hazan
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 5.474

6.  Electrochemical Disinfection of Experimentally Infected Teeth by Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode Treatment.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Böhm; Maximilian Koch; Stefan Rosiwal; Andreas Burkovski; Matthias Karl; Tanja Grobecker-Karl
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Qian Zhang; Xiaoying Zou; Lin Yue
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.344

Review 8.  Age-dependent root canal instrumentation techniques: a comprehensive narrative review.

Authors:  Michael Solomonov; Hyeon-Cheol Kim; Avi Hadad; Dan Henry Levy; Joe Ben Itzhak; Oleg Levinson; Hadas Azizi
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2020-03-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.