Literature DB >> 23611375

A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations.

Paul Hobeich1, Stephen Simon, Emit Schneiderman, Jianing He.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Local anesthetics can be buffered to a physiological pH before injection to decrease the time of onset and reduce injection pain.
METHODS: Thirty subjects with intact maxillary canines were included. The subjects randomly received, in a double-blind manner, 1 of the 3 maxillary infiltration injections of 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered at 5% and 10% with sodium bicarbonate by volume at 3 separate appointments. Pain on needle penetration and deposition of anesthetic solution was recorded by using a Heft-Parker visual analogue scale. Anesthetic onset was determined by 2 consecutive negative responses to electronic pulp test.
RESULTS: The mean anesthetic onset for nonbuffered anesthetics was 119 seconds, 116 seconds for the 5% buffered solutions, and 121 seconds for the 10% buffered solutions. There was no significant difference between the 3 groups. There was also no significant difference in pain on needle penetration or anesthetic deposition between the 3 anesthetic solutions tested.
CONCLUSIONS: Two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% or 10% sodium bicarbonate did not differ from nonbuffered solutions in anesthetic onset or injection pain in maxillary infiltrations of canines with healthy pulps.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23611375     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  7 in total

Review 1.  Effective anaesthesia of the acutely inflamed pulp: part 1. The acutely inflamed pulp.

Authors:  S S Virdee; D Seymour; S Bhakta
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  The efficacy of an elevated concentration of lidocaine HCl in impacted lower third molar surgery.

Authors:  Bushara Ping; Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen; Chavengkiat Saengsirinavin; Puthavy Im; Callum Durward; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 3.  Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Paul V Abbott
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-12-24

4.  Pain perception and efficacy of local analgesia using 2% lignocaine, buffered lignocaine, and 4% articaine in pediatric dental procedures.

Authors:  Afsal M M; Amit Khatri; Namita Kalra; Rishi Tyagi; Deepak Khandelwal
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-04-30

5.  Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy.

Authors:  Mahaboob Shahul Hameed; Senthil Kumar; C Charanya; M Muthalagu; M Anitha
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-03-20

6.  Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen Effect on IANB Injection Pain and Mandibular Pulpal Anesthesia in Asymptomatic Subjects.

Authors:  Ben Kushnir; Sara Fowler; Melissa Drum; John Nusstein; Al Reader; Mike Beck Dds
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2021-06-01

7.  Buffered lidocaine for paracervical blocks in first-trimester abortions: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Chin; Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Elia; Shandhini Raidoo; Michael Savala; Reni Soon
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-10-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.