Literature DB >> 23611242

Predictors of a clinical high risk status among individuals with a family history of psychosis.

Jacqueline Stowkowy1, Jean Addington.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk for psychosis can be assessed on the basis of genetic risk, referred to in the literature as family high risk (FHR) or through the presence of clinical high risk symptoms (CHR). Recent studies have also shown that certain risk factors (i.e. trauma, cannabis, migration) may play a role in the development of psychosis, possibly in combination with one another and in particular in combination with a family history of psychosis. It is unknown which risk factors may play a role in the prediction of CHR status among individuals whom are already genetically vulnerable. This study compared FHR individuals who also met CHR criteria to FHR individuals who did not on various risk factors, psychopathology and functioning.
METHOD: Participants were 25 who met FHR and CHR criteria (FHR + CHR) as determined by Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes, 25 who met only FHR criteria (FHR-non-CHR), and 25 healthy controls. A binary logistic regression was performed to determine the best predictors of belonging to the FHR + CHR group.
RESULTS: FHR + CHR and FHR-non CHR were significantly different on measures of age first tried cannabis (F = 3.65, p < 0.05) and IQ (F = 3.32, p < 0.05). FHR groups also differed on self-reported anxiety (F=11.79, p < 0.001) and current scores of social (F = 19.74, p < 0.0001) and role (F = 17.71, p < 0.0001) functioning. The most significant predictor of belonging to the FHR + CHR group was an earlier age of cannabis use (OR = 0.44, p = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: These preliminary results are promising in determining potential risk factors for the development of psychosis in those who are at risk for psychosis on the basis of a family history.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23611242      PMCID: PMC4356481          DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  52 in total

1.  Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: historical and meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Mary Cannon; Peter B Jones; Robin M Murray
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Cannabis use in adolescence and risk for adult psychosis: longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Louise Arseneault; Mary Cannon; Richie Poulton; Robin Murray; Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-23

3.  Childhood trauma and psychosis: new perspectives on aetiology and treatment.

Authors:  Sarah Bendall; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Barnaby Nelson; Patrick McGorry
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  Childhood head injury and expression of schizophrenia in multiply affected families.

Authors:  Philip AbdelMalik; Janice Husted; Eva W C Chow; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03

5.  Predicting schizophrenia: findings from the Edinburgh High-Risk Study.

Authors:  Eve C Johnstone; Klaus P Ebmeier; Patrick Miller; David G C Owens; Stephen M Lawrie
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Attention, memory, and motor skills as childhood predictors of schizophrenia-related psychoses: the New York High-Risk Project.

Authors:  L Erlenmeyer-Kimling; D Rock; S A Roberts; M Janal; C Kestenbaum; B Cornblatt; U H Adamo; I I Gottesman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Childhood abuse as a risk factor for psychotic experiences.

Authors:  I Janssen; L Krabbendam; M Bak; M Hanssen; W Vollebergh; R de Graaf; J van Os
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.392

8.  Psychopathology among offspring of parents with schizophrenia: relationship to premorbid impairments.

Authors:  Matcheri Keshavan; Debra M Montrose; Rajaprabhakaran Rajarethinam; Vaibhav Diwadkar; Konasale Prasad; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  The role of cognitive functioning in the outcome of those at clinical high risk for developing psychosis.

Authors:  J Addington; M Barbato
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.892

10.  Discrimination and delusional ideation.

Authors:  I Janssen; M Hanssen; M Bak; R V Bijl; R de Graaf; W Vollebergh; K McKenzie; J van Os
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of early trauma on psychosis development in clinical high-risk individuals and stability of trauma assessment across studies: a review.

Authors:  Samantha L Redman; Cheryl M Corcoran; David Kimhy; Dolores Malaspina
Journal:  Arch Psychol (Chic)       Date:  2017-12-18

2.  Traumatic brain injury in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Stephanie Deighton; Lisa Buchy; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Carrie E Bearden; Daniel Mathalon; Jean Addington
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Examining associations between psychosis risk, social anhedonia, and performance of striatum-related behavioral tasks.

Authors:  Nicole R Karcher; Elizabeth A Martin; John G Kerns
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-08

Review 4.  The Role of Trauma and Stressful Life Events among Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Review.

Authors:  Danessa Mayo; Sarah Corey; Leah H Kelly; Seghel Yohannes; Alyssa L Youngquist; Barbara K Stuart; Tara A Niendam; Rachel L Loewy
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 5.  Considering the Microbiome in Stress-Related and Neurodevelopmental Trajectories to Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Kevin W Hoffman; Jakleen J Lee; Cheryl M Corcoran; David Kimhy; Thorsten M Kranz; Dolores Malaspina
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Clinical and Functional Differences Between Mexican Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis and With Familial High Risk.

Authors:  Lourdes Nieto; Tecelli Domínguez-Martínez; Mauricio Rosel-Vales; Ricardo Saracco-Alvarez; Cesar Celada-Borja; María Luisa Rascón-Gasca
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.