Literature DB >> 23611210

Postoperative hyperphosphatemia significantly associates with adverse survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Zhong Ye1, Juan P Palazzo, Liz Lin, Yinzhi Lai, Fran Guiles, Ronald E Myers, Jin Han, Jinliang Xing, Hushan Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hyperphosphatemia has been implicated in the development and treatment of various cancers. However, whether it can be used as a direct prognostic marker of colorectal cancer (CRC) has remained unexplored. Given new insights into the importance of hyperphosphatemia in CRC, we sought to evaluate the association of hyperphosphatemia with the clinical outcomes of this disease.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of a well-characterized clinic-based cohort with 1241 CRC patients, we assessed the association of postoperative hyperphosphatemia with patient overall survival.
RESULTS: Postoperative hyperphosphatemia measured within the first month after surgery was significantly associated with CRC survival. Compared to patients with a normal phosphate level, those with hyperphosphatemia exhibited a significant unfavorable overall survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-2.29, P = 2.6 × 10(-8) (log-rank P = 1.2 × 10(-7) ). Stratified analyses indicated the association was more pronounced in patients with colon (HR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.57-2.56, P = 3.17 × 10(-8) ) but not rectal cancer (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.58-1.59, P = 0.889) (P interaction = 0.023), as well as in those not receiving chemotherapy (HR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.59-2.90, P = 6.2 × 10(-7) ) but not in those receiving chemotherapy (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.92-1.82, P = 0.136) (P interaction = 0.012). Flexible parametric survival model demonstrated that the increased risk for death conferred by postoperative hyperphosphatemia persisted over 150 months after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicated that postoperative hyperphosphatemia might be used as a prognostic marker of CRC patients after surgery. Since phosphate level is routinely tested in clinics, it may be incorporated into clinical models to predict CRC survival.
© 2013 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRC; hyperphosphatemia; phosphate; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23611210      PMCID: PMC3775915          DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  35 in total

1.  Calcium, phosphate and the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in a population with stable coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Norma Christine Grandi; Hermann Brenner; Harry Hahmann; Bernd Wüsten; Winfried März; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Lutz Philipp Breitling
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Phosphate: a stealthier killer than previously thought?

Authors:  Emilio Gonzalez-Parra; Jose Tuñón; Jesus Egido; Alberto Ortiz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Pathol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.185

3.  Tumor lysis syndrome following hemi-body irradiation for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A Y Rostom; G El-Hussainy; A Kandil; A Allam
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Prognosis of patients with breast cancer: causes of death and effects of time since diagnosis, age, and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Edoardo Colzani; Annelie Liljegren; Anna L V Johansson; Jan Adolfsson; Henrik Hellborg; Per F L Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Serum levels of phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and calcium and risks of death and cardiovascular disease in individuals with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Andrew Hayen; Petra Macaskill; Fabio Pellegrini; Jonathan C Craig; Grahame J Elder; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Spontaneous acute tumor lysis syndrome with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  I S Woo; J S Kim; M J Park; M S Lee; R W Cheon; H M Chang; J S Ahn; J A Lee; Y I Park; Y S Park; J W Shim; I Yang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Acute tumor lysis syndrome in a patient with mixed small cell and non-small cell tumor.

Authors:  Hassanali H Sewani; Jeffrey T Rabatin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Equity in cancer care: pathways, protocols, and guidelines.

Authors:  Jessica K DeMartino; Jonathan K Larsen
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome in solid tumors: really a rare condition?

Authors:  Eleonora Vaisban; Andrei Braester; Ofri Mosenzon; Maya Kolin; Yvona Horn
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.378

View more
  3 in total

1.  Phosphate and Cellular Senescence.

Authors:  Ming Chang Hu; Orson W Moe
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Impact of Perioperative Phosphorus and Glucose Levels on Liver Regeneration and Long-term Outcomes after Major Liver Resection.

Authors:  Georgios Antonios Margonis; Neda Amini; Stefan Buettner; Mounes Aliyari Ghasebeh; Sepideh Besharati; Yuhree Kim; Faiz Gani; Fatemeh Sobhani; Mario Samaha; Ihab R Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  HLJ1 is a novel biomarker for colorectal carcinoma progression and overall patient survival.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Jie Zhou; Cuiwei Zhang; Wenguang Fu; Xiuli Xiao; Sibei Ruan; Yuan Zhang; Xia Luo; Mingxi Tang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-02-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.