Literature DB >> 23611183

Measurement of arsenic relative bioavailability in swine.

William Brattin1, Stan Casteel.   

Abstract

This study describes a method for measuring the relative oral bioavailability (RBA) of arsenic (As) in soil and other soil-like media using young swine as the animal model. Groups of animals are exposed to site soil or sodium arsenate orally for 12 d. Forty-eight-hour urine samples were collected from each animal on d 6-7, 8-9, and 10-11 and were analyzed for total As. The urinary excretion fraction (UEF) for each group was estimated by plotting the mass of As excreted in urine by each animal as a function of the dose administered, and then fitting a linear model to the data using simultaneous weighted linear regression. The RBA of a test material is calculated as the ratio of the UEF value for the test material divided by the UEF of the reference material. Uncertainty around the RBA estimate is calculated using Fieller's theorem. Application of this method to a series of test soils indicates that RBA values for As can range from 18 to 52%. This wide variability supports the conclusion that there may be important differences in RBA between sites, and that use of a site-specific RBA value is likely to increase the accuracy of risk estimates for exposure to As in soil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23611183     DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2013.771562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  6 in total

1.  Intra- and Interlaboratory Evaluation of an Assay of Soil Arsenic Relative Bioavailability in Mice.

Authors:  Karen Bradham; Carina Herde; Paul Herde; Albert L Juhasz; Karen Herbin-Davis; Brittany Elek; Amy Farthing; Gary L Diamond; David J Thomas
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.279

2.  Evaluating the mouse model for estimation of arsenic bioavailability: Comparison of estimates of absolute bioavailability of inorganic arsenic in mouse, humans, and other species.

Authors:  Gary L Diamond; David J Thomas; Karen D Bradham
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  Modification of an existing in vitro method to predict relative bioavailable arsenic in soils.

Authors:  Shane Whitacre; Nicholas Basta; Brooke Stevens; Valerie Hanley; Richard Anderson; Kirk Scheckel
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Estimating Inorganic Arsenic Exposure from U.S. Rice and Total Water Intakes.

Authors:  Madhavi Mantha; Edward Yeary; John Trent; Patricia A Creed; Kevin Kubachka; Traci Hanley; Nohora Shockey; Douglas Heitkemper; Joseph Caruso; Jianping Xue; Glenn Rice; Larry Wymer; John T Creed
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability: relevant to human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Karen D Bradham; Gary L Diamond; Michele Burgess; Albert Juhasz; Julie M Klotzbach; Mark Maddaloni; Clay Nelson; Kirk Scheckel; Sophia M Serda; Marc Stifelman; David J Thomas
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  A Pooled Data Analysis to Determine the Relationship between Selected Metals and Arsenic Bioavailability in Soil.

Authors:  Kaihong Yan; Ravi Naidu; Yanju Liu; Ayanka Wijayawardena; Luchun Duan; Zhaomin Dong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.