Literature DB >> 23610856

Endotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy causes less cardiovascular response compared to classic direct laryngoscopy, in cardiac patients according a standard hospital protocol.

R L J G Maassen1, B M A Pieters, B Maathuis, J Serroyen, M A E Marcus, P Wouters, A A J van Zundert.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies comparing Glidescope and classic direct laryngoscopy did not show an attenuation of CV responses to endotracheal intubation. In the present study, we hypothesize that indirect videolaryngoscopy can attenuate cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation.
METHODS: In a randomized cross-over study, eighty adults (ASA PS II-III) were included. Both direct and indirect videolaryngoscopies were used in a random order, in the same patient. Cardiovascular responses to intubation were recorded as a relative change in rate pressure product (RPP = systolic blood pressure times heart rate) from baseline values. A linear mixed model was used to study the association between the outcome variable RPP and the type of laryngoscope used.
RESULTS: The relative increase of the RPP at intubation was significantly smaller (i.e. 27%, P < 0.001) using videolaryngoscopy compared to the classic direct laryngoscopy. Cardiovascular responses were blunted by an additional 10.2% (P = 0.029), when the patient was on beta blockade.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows less hemodynamic responses during endotracheal intubation using indirect videolaryngoscopy compared to classic direct laryngoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23610856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg        ISSN: 0001-5164


  8 in total

1.  [Effects of thoracic epidural administration of lidocaine on hemodynamic and arousal responses of double lumen tracheal intubation during induction of anesthesia].

Authors:  K P Liu; B N Wang; Y Y Shen; W X Li; Z Li; L Yao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

Review 2.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 3.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

4.  The Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy and Video Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Airways Management for Congenital Heart Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fatemeh Javaherforooshzadeh; Laleh Gharacheh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-06-09

Review 5.  Video screen visualization patterns when using a video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Preston Dean; Benjamin Kerrey
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  A comparison of performance of endotracheal intubation using the Levitan FPS optical stylet or Lary-Flex videolaryngoscope in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Tomasz Gaszynski; Monika Pietrzyk; Tomasz Szewczyk; Ewelina Gaszynska
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-05-20

7.  Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscope and GlideScope® for Orotracheal Intubation in Children Older Than One Year.

Authors:  Leyla Kılınç; Ayşe Surhan Çınar
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2019-06-24

8.  Comparison of videolaryngoscope-guided versus standard digital insertion techniques of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ulku Ozgul; Feray Akgul Erdil; Mehmet Ali Erdogan; Zekine Begec; Cemil Colak; Aytac Yucel; Mahmut Durmus
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.217

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.