Literature DB >> 23610550

The Perception, Level of Safety Satisfaction and Safety Feedback on Occupational Safety and Health Management among Hospital Staff Nurses in Sabah State Health Department.

Whye Lian Cheah1, Nelbon Giloi, Ching Thon Chang, Jac Fang Lim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the perception and level of safety satisfaction of staff nurses with regards to Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) management practice in the Sabah Health Department, and to associate the OSH management dimensions, to Safety Satisfaction and Safety Feedback.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a validated self-administered questionnaire was conducted among randomly respondents.
RESULTS: 135 nurses responded the survey. Mean (SD) score for each dimension ranged from 1.70 ± 0.68-4.04 ± 0.65, with Training and Competence dimension (mean [SD], 4.04 ± 0.65) had the highest while Safety Incidence was the least score (mean [SD], 1.70 ± 0.68). Both mean (SD) scores for Safety Satisfaction and Safety Feedback was high, 3.28 ± 0.51 and 3.57 ± 0.73, respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis indicated that all OSH dimensions had significant correlation with Safety Satisfaction and Safety Feedback (r coefficient ranged from 0.176-0.512) except for Safety Incidence.
CONCLUSION: The overall perception of OSH management was rather low. Significant correlation between Safety Satisfaction and Safety Feedback and several dimensions, suggest that each organization to put in place the leaders who have appropriate leadership and supervisory skills and committed in providing staff training to improve staff's competency in OSH practice. In addition, clear goals, rules, and reporting system will help the organization to implement proper OSH management practice.

Keywords:  hospital administration; nurses; occupational health; safety management; workplace

Year:  2012        PMID: 23610550      PMCID: PMC3629665     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays J Med Sci        ISSN: 1394-195X


  10 in total

1.  High-quality work, job satisfaction, and occupational injuries.

Authors:  Julian Barling; E Kevin Kelloway; Roderick D Iverson
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-04

2.  Staff turnover among hospital nurses.

Authors:  S J Cavanagh; D A Coffin
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 3.  Addressing the nursing work environment to promote patient safety.

Authors:  Laura Lin; Bryan A Liang
Journal:  Nurs Forum       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar

4.  Nurse work environments and occupational safety in intensive care units.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Robyn R M Gershon
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2006-11

5.  Nursing staff back injuries: prevalence and cost in long term care facilities.

Authors:  J Cohen-Mansfield; W J Culpepper; P Carter
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  1996-01

6.  First job experiences of recent RN graduates: improving the work environment.

Authors:  Cheryl Bowles; Lori Candela
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.737

7.  Stress causing psychosomatic illness among nurses.

Authors:  Pratibha P Kane
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-04

8.  Occupational health and safety issues among nurses in the Philippines.

Authors:  A B de Castro; Suzanne L Cabrera; Gilbert C Gee; Kaori Fujishiro; Eularito A Tagalog
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  2009-04

9.  Work-related injury among direct care occupations in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Hasanat Alamgir; Yuri Cvitkovich; Shicheng Yu; Annalee Yassi
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 10.  Nurses' working conditions: implications for infectious disease.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Sean P Clarke; Jeannie Cimiotti; Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.883

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Model for Promoting Occupational Safety and Health in Taiwan's Hospitals: An Integrative Approach.

Authors:  Hui-Ting Huang; Chung-Hung Tsai; Chia-Fen Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.