PURPOSE: Specific adverse events (AEs) associated with endocrine therapy and related to depletion or blocking of circulating estrogens may be related to treatment efficacy. We investigated the relationship between survival outcomes and specific AEs including vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), musculoskeletal adverse events (MSAEs), and vulvovaginal symptoms (VVSs) in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer participating in the international Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary efficacy end points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and distant metastases (DM). VMSs, MSAEs, and VVSs arising in the first year of endocrine treatment were considered. Patients who did not start or who discontinued their allocated therapy and/or had an event (recurrence/death) within 1 year after randomization were excluded. Landmark analyses and time-dependent multivariate Cox proportional hazards models assessed survival differences up to 5 years from the start of treatment. RESULTS:A total of 9,325 patients were included. Patients with specific AEs (v nonspecific or no AEs) had better DFS and OS (multivariate hazard ratio [HR] for DFS: VMSs, 0.731 [95% CI, 0.618 to 0.866]; MSAEs, 0.826 [95% CI, 0.694 to 0.982]; VVSs, 0.769 [95% CI, 0.585 to 1.01]; multivariate HR for OS: VMSs, 0.583 [95% CI, 0.424 to 0.803]; MSAEs, 0.811 [95% CI, 0.654 to 1.005]; VVSs, 0.570 [95% CI, 0.391 to 0.831]) and fewer DM (VMSs, 0.813 [95% CI, 0.664 to 0.996]; MSAEs, 0.749 [95% CI, 0.601 to 0.934]; VVSs, 0.687 [95% CI, 0.436 to 1.085]) than patients not reporting these symptoms. Increasing numbers of specific AEs were also associated with better survival outcomes. Outcomes were unrelated to treatment allocation. CONCLUSION: Certain specific AEs are associated with superior survival outcomes and may therefore be useful in predicting treatment responses in patients with breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Specific adverse events (AEs) associated with endocrine therapy and related to depletion or blocking of circulating estrogens may be related to treatment efficacy. We investigated the relationship between survival outcomes and specific AEs including vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), musculoskeletal adverse events (MSAEs), and vulvovaginal symptoms (VVSs) in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer participating in the international Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary efficacy end points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and distant metastases (DM). VMSs, MSAEs, and VVSs arising in the first year of endocrine treatment were considered. Patients who did not start or who discontinued their allocated therapy and/or had an event (recurrence/death) within 1 year after randomization were excluded. Landmark analyses and time-dependent multivariate Cox proportional hazards models assessed survival differences up to 5 years from the start of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 9,325 patients were included. Patients with specific AEs (v nonspecific or no AEs) had better DFS and OS (multivariate hazard ratio [HR] for DFS: VMSs, 0.731 [95% CI, 0.618 to 0.866]; MSAEs, 0.826 [95% CI, 0.694 to 0.982]; VVSs, 0.769 [95% CI, 0.585 to 1.01]; multivariate HR for OS: VMSs, 0.583 [95% CI, 0.424 to 0.803]; MSAEs, 0.811 [95% CI, 0.654 to 1.005]; VVSs, 0.570 [95% CI, 0.391 to 0.831]) and fewer DM (VMSs, 0.813 [95% CI, 0.664 to 0.996]; MSAEs, 0.749 [95% CI, 0.601 to 0.934]; VVSs, 0.687 [95% CI, 0.436 to 1.085]) than patients not reporting these symptoms. Increasing numbers of specific AEs were also associated with better survival outcomes. Outcomes were unrelated to treatment allocation. CONCLUSION: Certain specific AEs are associated with superior survival outcomes and may therefore be useful in predicting treatment responses in patients with breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy.
Authors: Shirley M Bluethmann; Caitlin C Murphy; Jasmin A Tiro; Michelle A Mollica; Sally W Vernon; Leona Kay Bartholomew Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: G J van Londen; Heidi S Donovan; Ellen B Beckjord; Alexandra L Cardy; Dana H Bovbjerg; Nancy E Davidson; Jennifer Q Morse; Galen E Switzer; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Mary Amanda Dew Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Vered Stearns; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Cynthia X Ma; Matthew J Ellis; James N Ingle; Kathleen I Pritchard; G Thomas Budd; Manuela Rabaglio; George W Sledge; Aurélie Le Maitre; Jessica Kundapur; Pedro E R Liedke; Lois E Shepherd; Paul E Goss Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Samantha Armstrong; Tina Roy; Bhavana Singh; Monika Kulasekaran; Fatima Shaukat; Xue Geng; Hongkun Wang; Petra Prins; Reena C Jha; Marion L Hartley; Aiwu Ruth He Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: J Huober; B F Cole; M Rabaglio; A Giobbie-Hurder; J Wu; B Ejlertsen; H Bonnefoi; J F Forbes; P Neven; I Láng; I Smith; A Wardley; K N Price; A Goldhirsch; A S Coates; M Colleoni; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kirsti I Toivonen; Devesh Oberoi; Kathryn King-Shier; Katherine-Ann L Piedalue; Joshua A Rash; Linda E Carlson; Tavis S Campbell Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Janine M Lombard; Nicholas Zdenkowski; Kathy Wells; Corinna Beckmore; Linda Reaby; John F Forbes; Jacquie Chirgwin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 3.359