BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Handgrip strength is a relevant marker of functional status and is also a component of nutrition assessment. The simplicity of this measurement supports its usefulness as a tool to predict who will likely take longer to hospital discharge. The aim of this study was to quantify the association between sex-specific handgrip strength at hospital admission and time to discharge alive. We intended to include a group of diverse diagnoses and to compare medical and surgical wards, taking into account the potential confounders' effect of patients' characteristics and severity of disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Prospective study in 2 public acute-care general hospitals in Porto, Portugal, in 2004. Handgrip strength was evaluated using a handgrip dynamometer in a probability sample of 425 patients from medical and surgical wards. The association between baseline handgrip strength and time to discharge was evaluated using survival analysis with discharge alive as the outcome and deaths and transfers being censored. RESULTS: In medical wards, women with high admission handgrip strength had a very short hospital stay (all had been discharged by the sixth day), and among men, patients with low handgrip strength had a particularly longer stay (approximately 50% were discharged after 15 days of hospitalization). In surgical wards, an increasing length of stay with decreasing handgrip strength quartiles was also observed in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Lower handgrip strength at hospital admission was associated with a longer time in the hospital, in patients of both sexes, in medical and surgical wards. Although this association was explained in part by age, height, education level, cognitive status, and disease severity, its direction remained unchanged regardless of the aforementioned factors.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Handgrip strength is a relevant marker of functional status and is also a component of nutrition assessment. The simplicity of this measurement supports its usefulness as a tool to predict who will likely take longer to hospital discharge. The aim of this study was to quantify the association between sex-specific handgrip strength at hospital admission and time to discharge alive. We intended to include a group of diverse diagnoses and to compare medical and surgical wards, taking into account the potential confounders' effect of patients' characteristics and severity of disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Prospective study in 2 public acute-care general hospitals in Porto, Portugal, in 2004. Handgrip strength was evaluated using a handgrip dynamometer in a probability sample of 425 patients from medical and surgical wards. The association between baseline handgrip strength and time to discharge was evaluated using survival analysis with discharge alive as the outcome and deaths and transfers being censored. RESULTS: In medical wards, women with high admission handgrip strength had a very short hospital stay (all had been discharged by the sixth day), and among men, patients with low handgrip strength had a particularly longer stay (approximately 50% were discharged after 15 days of hospitalization). In surgical wards, an increasing length of stay with decreasing handgrip strength quartiles was also observed in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Lower handgrip strength at hospital admission was associated with a longer time in the hospital, in patients of both sexes, in medical and surgical wards. Although this association was explained in part by age, height, education level, cognitive status, and disease severity, its direction remained unchanged regardless of the aforementioned factors.
Entities:
Keywords:
diagnosis-related groups; hand strength; length of stay; nutrition status; patient discharge; prognosis
Authors: R S Guerra; T F Amaral; A S Sousa; F Pichel; M T Restivo; S Ferreira; I Fonseca Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Jennifer M T A Meessen; Marta Fiocco; Rutger L Tordoir; Arnout Sjer; Suzan H M Verdegaal; P Eline Slagboom; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Rob G H H Nelissen Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Carlos H Martinez; Alejandro A Diaz; Catherine A Meldrum; Merry-Lynn N McDonald; Susan Murray; Gregory L Kinney; John E Hokanson; Jeffrey L Curtis; Russell P Bowler; MeiLan K Han; George R Washko; Elizabeth A Regan Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-11
Authors: Saulo Gil; Wilson Jacob Filho; Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo; Eduardo Ferriolli; Alexandre Leopold Busse; Thiago Junqueira Avelino-Silva; Igor Longobardi; Gersiel Nascimento de Oliveira Júnior; Paul Swinton; Bruno Gualano; Hamilton Roschel Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 12.063
Authors: Shirley J Simmonds; Holly E Syddall; Leo D Westbury; Richard M Dodds; Cyrus Cooper; Avan Aihie Sayer Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Inge Petersen; Nancy L Pedersen; Taina Rantanen; William S Kremen; Wendy Johnson; Matthew S Panizzon; Lene Christiansen; Carol E Franz; Matt McGue; Kaare Christensen; Nayla R Hamdi; Robert F Krueger; Chandra Reynolds Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 2.805