Literature DB >> 23609098

Consenting for risk in common ENT operations: an evidence-based approach.

M E Smith1, R Lakhani, N Bhat.   

Abstract

Pre-operative consent discussion and documentation is an essential process that should follow relevant guidance, and include all serious or frequently occurring risks. We assessed the appropriateness of consent for grommet insertion, tonsillectomy, septoplasty, and hemithyroidectomy, by comparing the risks listed in current consenting practice to published complication data for the relevant operation. 120 consent forms and associated clinic letters were analysed. A literature search identified published complication data for comparison. There was great variation in consent practice for each operation type, and poor correlation with published risk incidence. Only 'bleeding' post-tonsillectomy and 'recurrent laryngeal nerve injury' post hemithyroidectomy were listed in 100 % of relevant cases. Common and serious complications were frequently omitted from forms. The number and type of risks consented for a procedure significantly differed between consultant and non-consultant staff. The potential requirement for blood transfusion was discussed in only 20 % of tonsillectomy cases. Currently, the pre-operative consent for commonly performed ENT operations does not reflect operative risks. Consenting for surgical complications should be evidence based using published or personal data. A change in the consent process is required to protect patient autonomy and meet both legal and professional body requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23609098     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2464-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  Complications and legal outcomes of tonsillectomy malpractice claims.

Authors:  Andrew N Stevenson; Charles M Myer; Matthew D Shuler; Peter S Singer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Consent processes in common nose and throat procedures.

Authors:  Neil K Chadha; Rohit Pratap; Antony A Narula
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  Consent and complications: risk disclosure varies widely between individual surgeons.

Authors:  P L McManus; K E Wheatley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Changing practices in the consent process for nose and throat procedures: a three-year study.

Authors:  S E McDonald; N K Chadha; R S Mills
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 5.  Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Darren K Pinder; Helena Wilson; Malcolm P Hilton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

6.  Fibrin sealant: alternative to nasal packing in endonasal operations. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Michael Vaiman; Shlomo Sarfaty; Nathan Shlamkovich; Samuel Segal; Ephraim Eviatar
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.892

7.  Fifteen years' experience in thyroid surgery.

Authors:  John C Watkinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Taste disturbance following tonsillectomy--a prospective study.

Authors:  Clemens Heiser; Basile N Landis; Roland Giger; Helene Cao Van; Nils Guinand; Karl Hörmann; Boris A Stuck
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Consent for tonsillectomy.

Authors:  D Mistry; G Kelly
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2004-08

10.  Medical treatment and patient decisional power: the Italian state of the art.

Authors:  A Molinelli; A Bonsignore; G Rocca; R Ciliberti
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.