Helen A Brough1, Kerry Makinson2, Martin Penagos2, Soheila J Maleki3, Hsiaopo Cheng3, Abdel Douiri4, Alick C Stephens2, Victor Turcanu2, Gideon Lack5. 1. Department of Paediatric Allergy, MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Paediatric Allergy, MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 3. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, La. 4. Department of Public Health Science, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Paediatric Allergy, MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Gideon.lack@kcl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To halt the increase in peanut allergy, we must determine how children become sensitized to peanut. High household peanut consumption used as an indirect marker of environmental peanut exposure is associated with the development of peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate a method to quantify environmental peanut exposure, to determine how peanut is transferred into the environment after peanut consumption, and to determine whether environmental peanut persists despite cleaning. METHODS: After initial comparative studies among 3 ELISA kits, we validated and used the Veratox polyclonal peanut ELISA to assess peanut protein concentrations in dust and air and on household surfaces, bedding, furnishings, hand wipes, and saliva. RESULTS: The Veratox polyclonal peanut ELISA had the best rate of recovery of an independent peanut standard. We demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity and a less than 15% coefficient of variation for intra-assay, interassay, and interoperator variability. There was high within-home correlation for peanut protein levels in dust and household surface wipes. Airborne peanut levels were lower than the limit of quantitation for the Veratox polyclonal peanut ELISA in a number of simulated scenarios, except for a brief period directly above peanuts being deshelled. Peanut protein persisted on hands and in saliva 3 hours after peanut consumption. Peanut protein was completely removed from granite tables after cleaning with detergent, and levels were reduced but still present after detergent cleaning of laminate and wooden table surfaces, pillows, and sofa covers. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut spread easily around the home and might be resistant to usual cleaning methods. Peanut protein can be transferred into the environment by means of hand transfer and saliva but is unlikely to be aerosolized.
BACKGROUND: To halt the increase in peanut allergy, we must determine how children become sensitized to peanut. High household peanut consumption used as an indirect marker of environmental peanut exposure is associated with the development of peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate a method to quantify environmental peanut exposure, to determine how peanut is transferred into the environment after peanut consumption, and to determine whether environmental peanut persists despite cleaning. METHODS: After initial comparative studies among 3 ELISA kits, we validated and used the Veratox polyclonal peanut ELISA to assess peanut protein concentrations in dust and air and on household surfaces, bedding, furnishings, hand wipes, and saliva. RESULTS: The Veratox polyclonal peanut ELISA had the best rate of recovery of an independent peanut standard. We demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity and a less than 15% coefficient of variation for intra-assay, interassay, and interoperator variability. There was high within-home correlation for peanut protein levels in dust and household surface wipes. Airborne peanut levels were lower than the limit of quantitation for the Veratox polyclonal peanut ELISA in a number of simulated scenarios, except for a brief period directly above peanuts being deshelled. Peanut protein persisted on hands and in saliva 3 hours after peanut consumption. Peanut protein was completely removed from granite tables after cleaning with detergent, and levels were reduced but still present after detergent cleaning of laminate and wooden table surfaces, pillows, and sofa covers. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut spread easily around the home and might be resistant to usual cleaning methods. Peanut protein can be transferred into the environment by means of hand transfer and saliva but is unlikely to be aerosolized.
Authors: Johanna M Smeekens; Robert M Immormino; Peter A Balogh; Scott H Randell; Michael D Kulis; Timothy P Moran Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Hans Jürgen Hoffmann; Edward F Knol; Martha Ferrer; Lina Mayorga; Vito Sabato; Alexandra F Santos; Bernadette Eberlein; Anna Nopp; Donald MacGlashan Journal: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 4.806
Authors: George Du Toit; Graham Roberts; Peter H Sayre; Henry T Bahnson; Suzana Radulovic; Alexandra F Santos; Helen A Brough; Deborah Phippard; Monica Basting; Mary Feeney; Victor Turcanu; Michelle L Sever; Margarita Gomez Lorenzo; Marshall Plaut; Gideon Lack Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael D Kulis; Johanna M Smeekens; Robert M Immormino; Timothy P Moran Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 14.290
Authors: Michelle C Maciag; William J Sheehan; Lisa M Bartnikas; Peggy S Lai; Carter R Petty; Stephanie Filep; Martin D Chapman; Wanda Phipatanakul Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2021-06-24