Literature DB >> 23608713

Prognostic value of K-RAS mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Daquan Meng1, Mingli Yuan, Xiaojuan Li, Lijun Chen, Jie Yang, Xin Zhao, Wanli Ma, Jianbao Xin.   

Abstract

K-RAS gene mutations have been found in 20-30% of non-small cell lung cancer and occur most commonly in adenocarcinoma, however, there was no definitive conclusion about the prognostic role of K-RAS mutations in NSCLC. Herein we performed a systematic review of the literatures with meta-analysis to assess K-RAS mutations' prognostic value in NSCLC. After a methodological assessment, survival data from published studies were aggregated. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in terms of overall survival. 41 trials (6939 patients) were included in the analysis, the overall HR was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.29-1.62), showing that K-RAS mutations have an unfavorable impact on survival of patients with NSCLC. Then a subgroup analysis was performed about ethnicity, the combined HR was 1.97 (95% CI: 1.58-2.44) for Asians, and 1.37 (95% CI: 1.25-1.5) for non-Asians. In subgroup analysis of histology, the HR was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.24-1.55) for adenocarcinoma, suggesting that K-RAS mutations were correlated with shortened survival for adenocarcinoma. When the subgroup analysis was conducted according to disease stage, K-RAS mutations were poor prognostic factors in early stages: stage I (1.81; 95% CI: 1.36-2.39) and stage I-IIIa (1.68; 95% CI: 1.11-2.55), but not in advanced stage (IIIb-IV) (1.3; 95% CI: 0.99-1.71). At last, in subgroup analysis about test methods, all of the four methods: PCR-MSOP (1.73; 95% CI: 1.35-2.2), PCR-DGGE (1.27; 95% CI: 1.01-1.62), PCR-RFLP (1.88; 95% CI: 1.42-2.49) and PCR-seq (1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.58) showed statistically significant impact on survival of NSCLC patients. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that K-RAS mutations are associated with a worse overall survival in patients with NSCLC, especially in patients with adenocarcinoma and early stage.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23608713     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  55 in total

1.  Association Between Computed Tomographic Features and Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Mutations in Patients With Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma and Their Prognostic Value.

Authors:  Hua Wang; Matthew B Schabath; Ying Liu; Olya Stringfield; Yoganand Balagurunathan; John J Heine; Steven A Eschrich; Zhaoxiang Ye; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  The efficacy of first-line chemotherapy is associated with KRAS mutation status in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaxiong Zhang; Wenfeng Fang; Yue Yan; Mengyao Wang; Shiyang Kang; Jin Sheng; Jianhua Zhan; Nan Chen; Shaodong Hong; Yunpeng Yang; Yuxiang Ma; Dacheng He; Tao Qin; Ting Zhou; Yanna Tang; Xiaobo He; Wenhua Liang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  MicroRNAs: a new tool in the complex biology of KRAS mutated non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Stéphane Renaud; Joseph Seitlinger; Gilbert Massard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Enhanced MET Translation and Signaling Sustains K-Ras-Driven Proliferation under Anchorage-Independent Growth Conditions.

Authors:  Saori Fujita-Sato; Jacqueline Galeas; Morgan Truitt; Cameron Pitt; Anatoly Urisman; Sourav Bandyopadhyay; Davide Ruggero; Frank McCormick
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  First-line Chemotherapy Responsiveness and Patterns of Metastatic Spread Identify Clinical Syndromes Present Within Advanced KRAS Mutant Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer With Different Prognostic Significance.

Authors:  Wade T Iams; Hui Yu; Yu Shyr; Tejas Patil; Leora Horn; Caroline McCoach; Karen Kelly; Robert C Doebele; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 6.  Lung adenocarcinoma: from molecular basis to genome-guided therapy and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Roberto Chalela; Víctor Curull; César Enríquez; Lara Pijuan; Beatriz Bellosillo; Joaquim Gea
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Interleukin-17A Promotes Lung Tumor Progression through Neutrophil Attraction to Tumor Sites and Mediating Resistance to PD-1 Blockade.

Authors:  Esra A Akbay; Shohei Koyama; Yan Liu; Ruben Dries; Lauren E Bufe; Michael Silkes; Md Maksudul Alam; Dillon M Magee; Robert Jones; Masahisa Jinushi; Meghana Kulkarni; Julian Carretero; Xiaoen Wang; Tiquella Warner-Hatten; Jillian D Cavanaugh; Akio Osa; Atsushi Kumanogoh; Gordon J Freeman; Mark M Awad; David C Christiani; Raphael Bueno; Peter S Hammerman; Glenn Dranoff; Kwok-Kin Wong
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Epidemiology and Genomics of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Schabath; Douglas Cress; Teresita Munoz-Antonia
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.302

9.  KRAS AND THE REALITY OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE IN NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER.

Authors:  Havva O Kilgoz; Guzide Bender; Joseph M Scandura; Agnes Viale; Bahar Taneri
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.354

10.  Prognostic analysis of primary mucin-producing adenocarcinoma of the lung: a comprehensive retrospective study.

Authors:  Yang Qu; Dan Zhao; Jing Mu; Nanying Che; Chen Zhang; Zichen Liu; Dan Su; Lijuan Zhou; Haiqing Zhang; Lixin Wei
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.