Literature DB >> 23608340

Gaze categorization under uncertainty: psychophysics and modeling.

Isabelle Mareschal1, Andrew J Calder, Mark R Dadds, Colin W G Clifford.   

Abstract

The accurate perception of another person's gaze direction underlies most social interactions and provides important information about his or her future intentions. As a first step to measuring gaze perception, most experiments determine the range of gaze directions that observers judge as being direct: the cone of direct gaze. This measurement has revealed the flexibility of observers' perception of gaze and provides a useful benchmark against which to test clinical populations with abnormal gaze behavior. Here, we manipulated effective signal strength by adding noise to the eyes of synthetic face stimuli or removing face information. We sought to move beyond a descriptive account of gaze categorization by fitting a model to the data that relies on changing the uncertainty associated with an estimate of gaze direction as a function of the signal strength. This model accounts for all the data and provides useful insight into the visual processes underlying normal gaze perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23608340     DOI: 10.1167/13.5.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Perceiving facial affective ambiguity: A behavioral and neural comparison of adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Michael T Perino; Nancy L McElwain; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-01-10

2.  The effects of simulated vision impairments on the cone of gaze.

Authors:  Heiko Hecht; Jenny Hörichs; Sarah Sheldon; Jessilin Quint; Alex Bowers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Spatial selectivity in adaptation to gaze direction.

Authors:  Colin J Palmer; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Perception of direct gaze does not require focus of attention.

Authors:  Takemasa Yokoyama; Hiroki Sakai; Yasuki Noguchi; Shinichi Kita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Temporal Order Judgements of Dynamic Gaze Stimuli Reveal a Postdictive Prioritisation of Averted Over Direct Shifts.

Authors:  Nicola Binetti; Charlotte Harrison; Isabelle Mareschal; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-07-17

6.  Thalamic control of sensory selection in divided attention.

Authors:  Ralf D Wimmer; L Ian Schmitt; Thomas J Davidson; Miho Nakajima; Karl Deisseroth; Michael M Halassa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Dual-route model of the effect of head orientation on perceived gaze direction.

Authors:  Yumiko Otsuka; Isabelle Mareschal; Andrew J Calder; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Prior expectations about where other people are likely to direct their attention systematically influence gaze perception.

Authors:  Peter C Pantelis; Daniel P Kennedy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  How wide is the cone of direct gaze?

Authors:  Tarryn Balsdon; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Fixed or flexible? Orientation preference in identity and gaze processing in humans.

Authors:  Valérie Goffaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.