Literature DB >> 23607967

Comorbidity negatively influences the outcomes of diagnostic tests for musculoskeletal pain in the orofacial region.

Michail Koutris1, Corine M Visscher, Frank Lobbezoo, Machiel Naeije.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether diagnostic tests for musculoskeletal pain in the orofacial region [temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain] are influenced by the presence of comorbid conditions, and to determine whether this influence decreases when the presence of "familiar pain" is used as outcome measure. In total, 117 patients (35 men, 82 women; 75 TMD-pain patients, 42 pain-free patients; mean age ± SD = 42.94 ± 14.17 years) were examined with palpation tests and dynamic/static tests. After each test, they were asked whether any pain was provoked and whether this pain response was familiar or not. For four clinical outcome measures (pain on palpation, familiar pain on palpation, pain on dynamic/static tests, and familiar pain on dynamic/static tests), multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with the presence of TMD pain as the primary predictor and regional (neck/shoulder) pain, widespread pain, depression, and somatization as comorbid factors. Pain on palpation was not associated with the primary predictor but with regional pain [P = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) = 4.59] and somatization (P = 0.011, OR = 8.47), whereas familiar pain on palpation was associated with the primary predictor (P = 0.003, OR = 5.23), but also with widespread pain (P = 0.001, OR = 2.02). Pain on dynamic/static tests was associated with the primary predictor (P < 0.001, OR = 11.08), but also with somatization (P = 0.037, OR = 4.5), whereas familiar pain on dynamic/static tests was only associated with the primary predictor (P < 0.001, OR = 32.37). In conclusion, diagnostic tests are negatively influenced by the presence of comorbidity. This influence decreases when the presence of familiar pain is used as outcome measure.
Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23607967     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  6 in total

1.  The outcome of a temporomandibular joint compression test for the diagnosis of arthralgia is confounded by concurrent myalgia.

Authors:  Anna Lövgren; Corine M Visscher; Per Alstergren; Frank Lobbezoo; Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson; Anders Wänman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Dry needling for management of pain in the upper quarter and craniofacial region.

Authors:  David M Kietrys; Kerstin M Palombaro; Jeffrey S Mannheimer
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Pain Mechanisms and Centralized Pain in Temporomandibular Disorders.

Authors:  D E Harper; A Schrepf; D J Clauw
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Antinuclear antibody and rheumatoid factor positivity in temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Ji Rak Kim; Jung Hwan Jo; Jin Woo Chung; Ji Woon Park
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Orofacial pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis is associated with stress as well as psychosocial and functional limitations.

Authors:  Alexandra Dimitrijevic Carlsson; Kerstin Wahlund; Erik Kindgren; Thomas Skogh; Carin Starkhammar Johansson; Per Alstergren
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.054

6.  Development and internal validation of prediction models for persistence of self-reported orofacial pain in the follow-up of patients with myofascial pain.

Authors:  Naichuan Su; Frank Lobbezoo; Maurits K A van Selms; Geert J M G van der Heijden
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.