Literature DB >> 23606752

An Overview of Current Software Procedures for Fitting Linear Mixed Models.

Brady T West1, Andrzej T Galecki.   

Abstract

At present, there are many software procedures available enabling statisticians to fit linear mixed models (LMMs) to continuous dependent variables in clustered or longitudinal data sets. LMMs are flexible tools for analyzing relationships among variables in these types of data sets, in that a variety of covariance structures can be used depending on the subject matter under study. The explicit random effects in LMMs allow analysts to make inferences about the variability between clusters or subjects in larger hypothetical populations, and examine cluster- or subject-level variables that explain portions of this variability. These models can also be used to analyze longitudinal or clustered data sets with data that are missing at random (MAR), and can accommodate time-varying covariates in longitudinal data sets. While the software procedures currently available have many features in common, more specific analytic aspects of fitting LMMs (e.g., crossed random effects, appropriate hypothesis testing for variance components, diagnostics, incorporating sampling weights) may only be available in selected software procedures. With this article, we aim to perform a comprehensive and up-to-date comparison of the current capabilities of software procedures for fitting LMMs, and provide statisticians with a guide for selecting a software procedure appropriate for their analytic goals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covariance Structures; Longitudinal Data Analysis; Models for Clustered Data; Statistical Software

Year:  2012        PMID: 23606752      PMCID: PMC3630376          DOI: 10.1198/tas.2011.11077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Stat        ISSN: 0003-1305            Impact factor:   8.710


  7 in total

1.  Analyzing longitudinal data with the linear mixed models procedure in SPSS.

Authors:  Brady T West
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  C H Morrell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  M G Kenward; J H Roger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  MIXREG: a computer program for mixed-effects regression analysis with autocorrelated errors.

Authors:  D Hedeker; R D Gibbons
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model.

Authors:  D O Stram; J W Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Fitting multilevel models in complex survey data with design weights: Recommendations.

Authors:  Adam C Carle
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  True Interindividual Variability Exists in Postprandial Appetite Responses in Healthy Men But Is Not Moderated by the FTO Genotype.

Authors:  Fernanda R Goltz; Alice E Thackray; Greg Atkinson; Lorenzo Lolli; James A King; James L Dorling; Monika Dowejko; Sarabjit Mastana; David J Stensel
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Excess weight gain prevention in adolescents: Three-year outcome following a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Lauren B Shomaker; Denise E Wilfley; Jami F Young; Tracy Sbrocco; Mark Stephens; Sheila M Brady; Ovidiu Galescu; Andrew Demidowich; Cara H Olsen; Merel Kozlosky; James C Reynolds; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-11-03

3.  An introduction and integration of cross-classified, multiple membership, and dynamic group random-effects models.

Authors:  Guy Cafri; Donald Hedeker; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2015-08-03

4.  Impact of dental health on children's oral health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Aishah Alsumait; Mohamed ElSalhy; Kim Raine; Ken Cor; Rebecca Gokiert; Sabiha Al-Mutawa; Maryam Amin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Osteopathy and physiotherapy compared to physiotherapy alone on fatigue in long COVID: Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled superiority trial.

Authors:  Ana Christina Certain Curi; Ana Paula Antunes Ferreira; Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira; Ney Armando Mello Meziat Filho; Arthur Sá Ferreira
Journal:  Int J Osteopath Med       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Altered cerebrovascular response to acute exercise in patients with Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Jessica J Steventon; Hannah Furby; James Ralph; Peter O'Callaghan; Anne E Rosser; Richard G Wise; Monica Busse; Kevin Murphy
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2020-04-16

7.  Proteome dynamics during homeostatic scaling in cultured neurons.

Authors:  Aline Ricarda Dörrbaum; Beatriz Alvarez-Castelao; Belquis Nassim-Assir; Julian D Langer; Erin M Schuman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Using Item Response Theory for Explainable Machine Learning in Predicting Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit: Case-Based Approach.

Authors:  Adrienne Kline; Theresa Kline; Zahra Shakeri Hossein Abad; Joon Lee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.