BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been recognized as a common cause of hip pain as well as a cause of hip arthritis, yet despite this, little is known about the etiology of the cam morphology or possible risk factors associated with its development. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of our study were to determine when the cam morphology associated with FAI developed in a cross-sectional cohort study of pediatric patients pre- and postphyseal closure using MRI and whether increased activity level during the period of physeal closure is associated with an increased likelihood that the cam deformity will develop. METHODS: Alpha angles were measured at the 3 o'clock (anterior head-neck junction) and 1:30 (anterosuperior head-neck junction) positions in both hips with a cam deformity defined as an alpha angle ≥ 50.5° at the 3 o'clock position. Forty-four volunteers (88 hips) were studied: 23 with open physes (12 females, mean age 9.7 years; 11 males, age 11.7 years) and 21 with closed physes (five females, age 15.2 years; 16 males, age 16.2 years). Daily activity level using the validated Habitual Activity Estimation Scale was compared for patients in whom cam morphology did and did not develop. RESULTS: None of the 23 (0%) patients prephyseal closure had cam morphology, whereas three of 21 (14%, p = 0.02; all males) postclosure had at least one hip with cam morphology. Daily activity level was higher (p = 0.02) for patients with the cam morphology (7.1 hours versus 2.9 hours). Mean alpha angles at the 3 o'clock head-neck position were 38° (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.2°-39.1°) in the open physes group and 42° (95% CI, 40.16°-43.90°) in the closed physes group; at the 1:30 head-neck position, they were 45° (95% CI, 44.0°-46.4°) in the open physes group and 50° (47.9°-52.3°) in the closed physes group. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that cam morphology was present exclusively in the closed physeal group strongly supports its development during the period of physeal closure with increased activity level as a possible risk factor.
BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been recognized as a common cause of hip pain as well as a cause of hip arthritis, yet despite this, little is known about the etiology of the cam morphology or possible risk factors associated with its development. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of our study were to determine when the cam morphology associated with FAI developed in a cross-sectional cohort study of pediatric patients pre- and postphyseal closure using MRI and whether increased activity level during the period of physeal closure is associated with an increased likelihood that the cam deformity will develop. METHODS: Alpha angles were measured at the 3 o'clock (anterior head-neck junction) and 1:30 (anterosuperior head-neck junction) positions in both hips with a cam deformity defined as an alpha angle ≥ 50.5° at the 3 o'clock position. Forty-four volunteers (88 hips) were studied: 23 with open physes (12 females, mean age 9.7 years; 11 males, age 11.7 years) and 21 with closed physes (five females, age 15.2 years; 16 males, age 16.2 years). Daily activity level using the validated Habitual Activity Estimation Scale was compared for patients in whom cam morphology did and did not develop. RESULTS: None of the 23 (0%) patients prephyseal closure had cam morphology, whereas three of 21 (14%, p = 0.02; all males) postclosure had at least one hip with cam morphology. Daily activity level was higher (p = 0.02) for patients with the cam morphology (7.1 hours versus 2.9 hours). Mean alpha angles at the 3 o'clock head-neck position were 38° (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.2°-39.1°) in the open physes group and 42° (95% CI, 40.16°-43.90°) in the closed physes group; at the 1:30 head-neck position, they were 45° (95% CI, 44.0°-46.4°) in the open physes group and 50° (47.9°-52.3°) in the closed physes group. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that cam morphology was present exclusively in the closed physeal group strongly supports its development during the period of physeal closure with increased activity level as a possible risk factor.
Authors: Stephan Reichenbach; Michael Leunig; Stefan Werlen; Eveline Nüesch; Christian W Pfirrmann; Harald Bonel; Alex Odermatt; Willy Hofstetter; Reinhold Ganz; Peter Jüni Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2011-12
Authors: Reinhold Ganz; Javad Parvizi; Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Hubert Nötzli; Klaus A Siebenrock Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kee Hyung Rhyu; Young Soo Chun; Gwang Young Jung; Yoon Je Cho Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Tobias Hesper; Sarah D Bixby; Daniel A Maranho; Patricia Miller; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: George Grammatopoulos; Paul Jamieson; Johanna Dobransky; Kawan Rakhra; Sasha Carsen; Paul E Beaulé Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Markus S Hanke; Florian Schmaranzer; Simon D Steppacher; Stephan Reichenbach; Stefan F Werlen; Klaus A Siebenrock Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Rachel E Horenstein; Quentin Meslier; Julia A Spada; Anne Halverstadt; Cara L Lewis; Mo Gimpel; Richard Birchall; Thamindu Wedatilake; Scott Fernquest; Antony Palmer; Siôn Glyn-Jones; Sandra J Shefelbine Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2021-01-10 Impact factor: 3.494