Literature DB >> 23604092

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is effective and safe in short- and long-term urinary drainage.

Umut Gonulalan1, Tufan Cicek, Okan Istanbulluoglu, Murat Kosan, Bulent Ozturk, Hakan Ozkardes.   

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with ureteral catheter or double-J stent in comparison with standard PCNL in our study. We retrospectively evaluated 707 of 1,469 patients with stone area under 800 mm(2) and only one subcostal nephrostomy access that was underwent PCNL between March 2004 and October 2011 in our clinic. Patients with 14F nephrostomy tube (Malecot or Re-entry catheter), with ureteral stent and with antegrade double-J stent were included into Group 1 (n = 180), Group 2 (n = 148) and Group 3 (n = 120), respectively. The mean hospitalization time of patients in Group 1 was significantly longer. The mean VAS was significantly higher in Group 1. On the other hand the mean fluoroscopy and operation time of patients in Group 2 were significantly shorter in comparison with other groups. Number of patients with postoperative transfusion requirement was significantly higher in Group 1. The number of patients with postoperative narcotic analgesic requirement was also significantly higher in Group 1. The most frequent complication in our study was prolonged drainage. The postoperative complications were seen more frequently in Group 1. Both ureter catheter and double j stent were more comfortable, effective and safe in urinary drainage following PCNL with single sub-costal access. On the other hand, double-J stent has a disadvantage as requirement additional cystoscopy for removal. We suggest ureter catheter or double-J stent to preserve short- and long-term urinary drainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23604092     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0560-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  29 in total

1.  Use of fibrin glue in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Albert A Mikhail; John S Kaptein; Gary C Bellman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large complete staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Monish Aron; Rajiv Yadav; Rajiv Goel; Surendra B Kolla; Gagan Gautam; Ashok K Hemal; Narmada P Gupta
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Chien-Hsing Chang; Chung-Jing Wang; Shi-Wei Huang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-02-18

4.  Almost totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: further evolution of the technique.

Authors:  M Goh; J S Wolf
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Nephrostomy tube placement after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: critical evaluation through a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ahmed M Shoma; Ahmed M Elshal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  G C Bellman; R Davidoff; J Candela; J Gerspach; S Kurtz; L Stout
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Annika Andersson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  Baris Kuzgunbay; Tahsin Turunc; Sule Akin; Pinar Ergenoglu; Anis Aribogan; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  W J Lee; A D Smith; V Cubelli; G H Badlani; B Lewin; F Vernace; E Cantos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Kadir Tepeler; Aytul Tas; Sabahattin Aydin; Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hemostatic agents used for nephrostomy tract closure after tubeless PCNL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cui Yu; Zhou Xu; Wang Long; Liu Longfei; Zeng Feng; Qi Lin; Zu Xiongbing; Chen Hequn
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  N Moosanejad; A Firouzian; S A Hashemi; M Bahari; M Fazli
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.590

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.