| Literature DB >> 23604076 |
Patrizia Morciano1, Yi Zhang, Giovanni Cenci, Yikang S Rong.
Abstract
Using Drosophila as a model system, we identified a stringent requirement for the conserved function of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) in telomere protection during early embryonic development. Animals homozygous for a hypomorphic mutation in atm develop normally with minimal telomere dysfunction. However, mutant females produce inviable embryos that succumb to mitotic failure caused by covalent fusions of telomeric DNA. Interestingly, although the atm mutation encodes a premature stop codon, it must not have eliminated the production of the mutant protein, and the mutant protein retains kinase activity upon DNA damage. Moreover, although the embryonic phenotype of this mutation resembles that of hypomorphic mutations in the MRN complex, the function of MRN appears normal in the atm embryos. In contrast, there is a prominent reduction of the level of HipHop, an essential member of the Drosophila capping complex. How ATM functions in telomere protection remains poorly understood. The amenability of Drosophila embryos to molecular and biochemical investigations ensures that this newly identified mutation will facilitate future studies of ATM in telomere maintenance.Entities:
Keywords: ATM kinase; Drosophila hypomorphic mutation; MRN complex; maternal lethal; telomere protection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23604076 PMCID: PMC3689801 DOI: 10.1534/g3.113.006312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Mitotic defects in m-tefu embryos. (A−B) DAPI-staining of 0−2 hr wild-type (wt) and m-tefu (tefu) embryos. Although wt embryos show a uniform distribution of nuclei on the cortex, m-tefu embryos exhibit an aberrant pattern and the presence of large nuclei-free areas (arrowhead). (C) A close-up of panel B. Nuclei connected by chromatin bridges (arrow) and multilobed nuclei (asterisk) are abundant in m-tefu embryos. (D−G) Mitotic chromosome preparations from wt and m-tefu (tefu) embryos. Whereas all wild-type chromosomes are individually distinct (D), metaphase chromosomes from m-tefu exhibit telomeric fusions that give rise to chromosome chains (E), anaphase bridges (F), and hyperploid cells (G).
Figure 2Telomere fusions in m-tefu are covalent DNA linkages. (A) Schematic of the PCR procedure used to recover telomere fusion junctions. Telomeric HeT-A retro-transposons are depicted as block arrows in gray. They attach to chromosomal DNA (in black) unidirectionally. Black and white arrowheads denote a pair of telomere-facing primers. They anneal to multiple positions along the HeT-A arrays. The top diagram denotes the wild-type situation in which the PCRs are not expected to be productive. The middle diagram depicts a telomere fusion in which PCR with some primer pairs will lead to productive amplifications. (B) A picture of a DNA gel electrophoresis showing PCR products obtained using wild type (+) or m-tefu (−) DNA templates. The primer combinations are listed at the top. m: marker DNA with sizes in kb. (C) Sequence of a fusion junction from m-tefu. The nucleotide numbers are from GenBank entry U06920.2. Three strands (in the 5′ to 3′ direction) are shown, with the actual sequences connected through a fusion (underlined). The rest of the sequences are those predicted from U06920.2. The top sequence is from a telomere that fused with another telomere (bottom sequence), giving rise to the fusion product denoted in the middle sequence. The fusion was created by the use of an overlapping “GT” (in bold) microhomology for repair.
Telomere fusion junctions
Fifteen independent telomere fusion events were listed, with the sequences of the two “parental” telomeres listed as “Telomere 1” (red telomere) and “Telomere 2” (green telomere). For each telomere, the sequence denotes the strand that is going from centromere to telomere. In the “Junction” column, apparent microhomology used during NHEJ has been underlined, which include fusion events 2, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15. For events 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, “filler DNA” was used during NHEJ and the involved nucleotides are shown in black. “ID sequence” are Genbank numbers for the sequence used to deduced the fusion events.
Figure 3Integrity of the telomeric complexes in m-tefu embryos. (A) Western blot analysis of Nbs and Mre11 in wildtype (+) and m-tefu (−) embryonic extracts. Tubulin is probed as a loading control and molecular marker weights (kD) are indicated to the left. (B) Localization of Rad50 in tefu. Gray scale pictures show DAPI-stained DNA or antibody-stained Rad50. (C) Western blot analysis of the levels of HipHop and HOAP in m-tefu (−) embryos. (D) Localization of HipHop in tefu. Grayscale pictures show DAPI-stained DNA or antibody-stained HipHop. In wild-type, HipHop forms nuclear foci. In the m-tefu mutant, nuclei lacking of HipHop signals are shown on the left. On the right are two nuclei, one of which shows HipHop foci.
Figure 4Damage-induced H2AvD phosphorylation is normal in tefu. (A) Dependence of H2AvD phosphorylation on ATM and MRN. Extracts of the indicated genotypes were made from proliferating tissues in third instar larvae before (−) or 15 min after (+) irradiation. Membranes were probed with an antibody that recognizes both the phosphorylated (+P) and the unphosphorylated forms of H2AvD. For flies with the H2AvD genotype, the only functional H2AvD copy has a C-terminal truncation that deletes the antibody epitope, and serves as a negative control. Tubulin was used as a loading control. (B). H2AvD phosphorylation activity in atm atr double mutant larvae. Extracts were taken from animals before (−), 15′ after, or 120′ after irradiation of either wt or atm atr double mutant larvae. (C) H2AvD phosphorylation in the tefu mutant. Membranes were probed with an antibody specifically recognizes P-H2AvD. Two wild-type controls were included: Or-R and Zuker, which is the parental stock for tefu. The Giotto protein was used as a loading control.