Andrea Mannini1, Stephen S Intille, Mary Rosenberger, Angelo M Sabatini, William Haskell. 1. 1The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, ITALY; 2College of Computer and Information Science and Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA; and 3Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Large physical activity surveillance projects such as the UK Biobank and NHANES are using wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitors that collect raw data. The goal is to increase wear time by asking subjects to wear the monitors on the wrist instead of the hip, and then to use information in the raw signal to improve activity type and intensity estimation. The purposes of this work was to obtain an algorithm to process wrist and ankle raw data and to classify behavior into four broad activity classes: ambulation, cycling, sedentary, and other activities. METHODS: Participants (N = 33) wearing accelerometers on the wrist and ankle performed 26 daily activities. The accelerometer data were collected, cleaned, and preprocessed to extract features that characterize 2-, 4-, and 12.8-s data windows. Feature vectors encoding information about frequency and intensity of motion extracted from analysis of the raw signal were used with a support vector machine classifier to identify a subject's activity. Results were compared with categories classified by a human observer. Algorithms were validated using a leave-one-subject-out strategy. The computational complexity of each processing step was also evaluated. RESULTS: With 12.8-s windows, the proposed strategy showed high classification accuracies for ankle data (95.0%) that decreased to 84.7% for wrist data. Shorter (4 s) windows only minimally decreased performances of the algorithm on the wrist to 84.2%. CONCLUSIONS: A classification algorithm using 13 features shows good classification into the four classes given the complexity of the activities in the original data set. The algorithm is computationally efficient and could be implemented in real time on mobile devices with only 4-s latency.
PURPOSE: Large physical activity surveillance projects such as the UK Biobank and NHANES are using wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitors that collect raw data. The goal is to increase wear time by asking subjects to wear the monitors on the wrist instead of the hip, and then to use information in the raw signal to improve activity type and intensity estimation. The purposes of this work was to obtain an algorithm to process wrist and ankle raw data and to classify behavior into four broad activity classes: ambulation, cycling, sedentary, and other activities. METHODS:Participants (N = 33) wearing accelerometers on the wrist and ankle performed 26 daily activities. The accelerometer data were collected, cleaned, and preprocessed to extract features that characterize 2-, 4-, and 12.8-s data windows. Feature vectors encoding information about frequency and intensity of motion extracted from analysis of the raw signal were used with a support vector machine classifier to identify a subject's activity. Results were compared with categories classified by a human observer. Algorithms were validated using a leave-one-subject-out strategy. The computational complexity of each processing step was also evaluated. RESULTS: With 12.8-s windows, the proposed strategy showed high classification accuracies for ankle data (95.0%) that decreased to 84.7% for wrist data. Shorter (4 s) windows only minimally decreased performances of the algorithm on the wrist to 84.2%. CONCLUSIONS: A classification algorithm using 13 features shows good classification into the four classes given the complexity of the activities in the original data set. The algorithm is computationally efficient and could be implemented in real time on mobile devices with only 4-s latency.
Authors: Stephen S Intille; Fahd Albinali; Selene Mota; Benjamin Kuris; Pilar Botana; William L Haskell Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2011
Authors: Mary E Rosenberger; William L Haskell; Fahd Albinali; Selene Mota; Jason Nawyn; Stephen Intille Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Andrea Mannini; Mary Rosenberger; William L Haskell; Angelo M Sabatini; Stephen S Intille Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Susan L Murphy; Angela K Lyden; Anna L Kratz; Heather Fritz; David A Williams; Daniel J Clauw; Arnold R Gammaitoni; Kristine Phillips Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Pubudu N Pathirana; M Sajeewani Karunarathne; Gareth L Williams; Phan T Nam; Hugh Durrant-Whyte Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: Mamoun T Mardini; Subhash Nerella; Amal A Wanigatunga; Santiago Saldana; Ramon Casanova; Todd M Manini Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2021-01-25