Literature DB >> 23603775

An urban metabolism and ecological footprint assessment of Metro Vancouver.

Jennie Moore1, Meidad Kissinger, William E Rees.   

Abstract

As the world urbanizes, the role of cities in determining sustainability outcomes grows in importance. Cities are the dominant form of human habitat, and most of the world's resources are either directly or indirectly consumed in cities. Sustainable city analysis and management requires understanding the demands a city places on a wider geographical area and its ecological resource base. We present a detailed, integrated urban metabolism of residential consumption and ecological footprint analysis of the Vancouver metropolitan region for the year 2006. Our overall goal is to demonstrate the application of a bottom-up ecological footprint analysis using an urban metabolism framework at a metropolitan, regional scale. Our specific objectives are: a) to quantify energy and material consumption using locally generated data and b) to relate these data to global ecological carrying capacity. Although water is the largest material flow through Metro Vancouver (424,860,000 m(3)), it has the smallest ecological footprint (23,100 gha). Food (2,636,850 tonnes) contributes the largest component to the ecological footprint (4,514,400 gha) which includes crop and grazing land as well as carbon sinks required to sequester emissions from food production and distribution. Transportation fuels (3,339,000 m(3)) associated with motor vehicle operation and passenger air travel comprises the second largest material flow through the region and the largest source of carbon dioxide emissions (7,577,000 tonnes). Transportation also accounts for the second largest component of the EF (2,323,200 gha). Buildings account for the largest electricity flow (17,515,150 MWh) and constitute the third largest component of the EF (1,779,240 gha). Consumables (2,400,000 tonnes) comprise the fourth largest component of the EF (1,414,440 gha). Metro Vancouver's total Ecological Footprint in 2006 was 10,071,670 gha, an area approximately 36 times larger than the region itself. The EFA reveals that cropland and carbon sinks (forested land required to sequester carbon dioxide emissions) account for 90% of Metro Vancouver's overall demand for biocapacity. The per capita ecological footprint is 4.76 gha, nearly three times the per capita global supply of biocapacity. Note that this value excludes national government services that operate outside the region and could account for up to an additional 2 gha/ca.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23603775     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

1.  News Feature: The quest for the sustainable city.

Authors:  M Mitchell Waldrop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries.

Authors:  Sajid Ali; Zulkornain Yusop; Shivee Ranjanee Kaliappan; Lee Chin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  A Comparative Analysis on Assessment of Land Carrying Capacity with Ecological Footprint Analysis and Index System Method.

Authors:  Yao Qian; Lina Tang; Quanyi Qiu; Tong Xu; Jiangfu Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Eight energy and material flow characteristics of urban ecosystems.

Authors:  Xuemei Bai
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Evaluation and Analysis of Eco-Security in Environmentally Sensitive Areas Using an Emergy Ecological Footprint.

Authors:  Han-Shen Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Sustainable food transition in Portugal: Assessing the Footprint of dietary choices and gaps in national and local food policies.

Authors:  Alessandro Galli; Sara Moreno Pires; Katsunori Iha; Armando Abrunhosa Alves; David Lin; Maria Serena Mancini; Filipe Teles
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Assessing the asymmetric impact of physical infrastructure and trade openness on ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from Pakistan.

Authors:  Samia Zahra; Dilawar Khan; Rakesh Gupta; József Popp; Judit Oláh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.