OBJECTIVE: Cervical and vaginal cancers have virally-mediated or mutated defects in DNA damage repair responses, making these cancers sensible targets for ribonucleotide reductase inhibition during radiochemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a phase II study evaluating 3× weekly 2-hour intravenous 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP, 25 mg/m(2)) co-administered with 1× weekly intravenous cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) and daily pelvic radiation (45 Gy) in women with stage I(B2)-IV(B) cervical (n=22) or stage II-IV vaginal (n=3) cancers. Brachytherapy followed (40 Gy). Toxicity was monitored by common terminology criteria for adverse events (version 3.0). The primary end point of response was assessed by 3-month posttherapy 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET/CT) and clinical examination. RESULTS: 3-AP radiochemotherapy achieved clinical responses in 24 (96% [95% confidence interval: 80-99%]) of 25 patients (median follow-up 20 months, range 2-35 months). 23 (96% [95% confidence interval: 80-99%]) of 24 patients had 3-month posttherapy PET/CT scans that recorded metabolic activity in the cervix or vagina equal or less than that of the cardiac blood pool, suggesting complete metabolic responses. The most frequent 3-AP radiochemotherapy-related adverse events included fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and reversible hematological and electrolyte abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 3-AP to cisplatin radiochemotherapy was tolerable and produced high rates of clinical and metabolic responses in women with cervical and vaginal cancers. Future randomized phase II and III clinical trials of 3-AP radiochemotherapy are warranted.
OBJECTIVE: Cervical and vaginal cancers have virally-mediated or mutated defects in DNA damage repair responses, making these cancers sensible targets for ribonucleotide reductase inhibition during radiochemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a phase II study evaluating 3× weekly 2-hour intravenous 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP, 25 mg/m(2)) co-administered with 1× weekly intravenous cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) and daily pelvic radiation (45 Gy) in women with stage I(B2)-IV(B) cervical (n=22) or stage II-IV vaginal (n=3) cancers. Brachytherapy followed (40 Gy). Toxicity was monitored by common terminology criteria for adverse events (version 3.0). The primary end point of response was assessed by 3-month posttherapy 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET/CT) and clinical examination. RESULTS:3-AP radiochemotherapy achieved clinical responses in 24 (96% [95% confidence interval: 80-99%]) of 25 patients (median follow-up 20 months, range 2-35 months). 23 (96% [95% confidence interval: 80-99%]) of 24 patients had 3-month posttherapy PET/CT scans that recorded metabolic activity in the cervix or vagina equal or less than that of the cardiac blood pool, suggesting complete metabolic responses. The most frequent 3-AP radiochemotherapy-related adverse events included fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and reversible hematological and electrolyte abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 3-AP to cisplatin radiochemotherapy was tolerable and produced high rates of clinical and metabolic responses in women with cervical and vaginal cancers. Future randomized phase II and III clinical trials of 3-AP radiochemotherapy are warranted.
Authors: Charles A Kunos; Tomas Radivoyevitch; John Pink; Song-Mao Chiu; Tammy Stefan; James Jacobberger; Timothy J Kinsella Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Charles A Kunos; Valdir C Colussi; John Pink; Tomas Radivoyevitch; Nancy L Oleinick Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Frederick B Stehman; Shamshad Ali; Henry M Keys; Laila I Muderspach; Weldon E Chafe; Donald G Gallup; Joan L Walker; Deborah Gersell Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Patricia J Eifel; Kathryn Winter; Mitchell Morris; Charles Levenback; Perry W Grigsby; Jay Cooper; Marvin Rotman; David Gershenson; David G Mutch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joanne B Weidhaas; Shu-Xia Li; Kathryn Winter; Janice Ryu; Anuja Jhingran; Bridgette Miller; Adam P Dicker; David Gaffney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Myrna Candelaria; José Chanona-Vilchis; Lucely Cetina; Diana Flores-Estrada; Carlos López-Graniel; Aaron González-Enciso; David Cantú; Adela Poitevin; Lesbia Rivera; Jose Hinojosa; Jaime de la Garza; Alfonso Dueñas-Gonzalez Journal: Int Semin Surg Oncol Date: 2006-02-03
Authors: C S Gardner; J Sunil; A H Klopp; C E Devine; T Sagebiel; C Viswanathan; P R Bhosale Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Kimiko Ishiguro; Z Ping Lin; Philip G Penketh; Krishnamurthy Shyam; Rui Zhu; Raymond P Baumann; Yong-Lian Zhu; Alan C Sartorelli; Thomas J Rutherford; Elena S Ratner Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Anand Joshi; Brian F Kiesel; Nupur Chaphekar; Reyna Jones; Jianxia Guo; Charles A Kunos; Sarah Taylor; Edward Chu; Raman Venkataramanan; Jan H Beumer Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 3.333