Literature DB >> 23603291

Enrollment in research under exception from informed consent: the Patients' Experiences in Emergency Research (PEER) study.

Neal W Dickert1, Victoria A Mah, Jill M Baren, Michelle H Biros, Prasanthi Govindarajan, Arthur Pancioli, Robert Silbergleit, David W Wright, Rebecca D Pentz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation research requires an exception from informed consent (EFIC). Despite concerns that patients may find EFIC unacceptable, the views and experiences of patients enrolled in an EFIC study are largely unknown.
METHODS: The Patients' Experience in Emergency Research (PEER) study was nested within the Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial (RAMPART) for pre-hospital treatment of status epilepticus. PEER included 61 EFIC enrollees or their surrogates from 5 sites. Interviews used a structured, interactive guide focusing on acceptance of EFIC enrollment in RAMPART and existing regulatory protections. Simple statistics were generated, and textual data were analyzed for common themes.
RESULTS: 24 enrolled patients and 37 surrogates were successfully interviewed. 49/60 (82%) were glad they or their family member were included in RAMPART; 54/57 (95%) felt research on emergency seizure treatment is important. 43/59 (73%) found their inclusion under EFIC acceptable; 10 (17%) found it unacceptable, and 6 (10%) were neutral. There were no statistically significant interactions between enrollment attitudes and demographic characteristics, though there were trends toward lower acceptance among interviewees who were non-white, less educated, or had prior research experience. The most common concerns related to lack of consent prior to RAMPART enrollment. Positive responses related to perceived medical benefits, recognition of the impracticality of consent, and wanting doctors to do what needs to be done in emergencies. Many participants had difficulty understanding the trial and EFIC.
CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects had positive views of enrollment, and acceptance generally correlated with results of community consultation studies.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community consultation; Ethics; Research ethics; Research in emergency settings; Resuscitation research

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23603291      PMCID: PMC3770787          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  19 in total

Review 1.  Is emergency research without initial consent justified?: the consent substitute model.

Authors:  Emily A Largent; David Wendler; Ezekiel Emanuel; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-26

2.  Community views on neurologic emergency treatment trials.

Authors:  Scott E Kasner; Jill M Baren; Peter D Le Roux; Pamela G Nathanson; Katherine Lamond; Stacy L Rosenberg; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial.

Authors:  C Snowdon; J Garcia; D Elbourne
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Attitudes of emergency department patients and visitors regarding emergency exception from informed consent in resuscitation research, community consultation, and public notification.

Authors:  Katie B McClure; Nicole M DeIorio; Mary D Gunnels; Maria J Ochsner; Michelle H Biros; Terri A Schmidt
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Conduct of emergency research in patients unable to give consent--experiences and perceptions of patients, their consent providing next of kin, and treating physicians following a prehospital resuscitation trial.

Authors:  Antti Kämäräinen; Tom Silfvast; Sini Saarinen; Janne Virta; Ilkka Virkkunen
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Community consultation in emergency research.

Authors:  Charles Contant; Laurence B McCullough; Lorna Mangus; Claudia Robertson; Alex Valadka; Baruch Brody
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Intramuscular versus intravenous therapy for prehospital status epilepticus.

Authors:  Robert Silbergleit; Valerie Durkalski; Daniel Lowenstein; Robin Conwit; Arthur Pancioli; Yuko Palesch; William Barsan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The random dialing survey as a tool for community consultation for research involving the emergency medicine exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Eileen M Bulger; Terri A Schmidt; Andrea J Cook; Karen J Brasel; Denise E Griffiths; Peter J Kudenchuk; Daniel Davis; Berit Bardarson; Ahamed H Idris; Tom P Aufderheide
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Community attitudes towards emergency research and exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Michelle H Biros; Corey Sargent; Kathleen Miller
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: a study of survivors of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  15 in total

1.  An Alternative Consent Process for Minimal Risk Research in the ICU.

Authors:  Melissa A Terry; Daniel E Freedberg; Marilyn C Morris
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Variations in the application of exception from informed consent in a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Jestin N Carlson; Dana Zive; Denise Griffiths; Karen N Brown; Robert H Schmicker; Heather Herren; George Sopko; Sara DiFiore; Dixie Climer; Caroline Herdeman; Ahamed Idris; Graham Nichol; Henry E Wang
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.

Authors:  Louisa W Whitesides; Jill M Baren; Michelle H Biros; Ross J Fleischman; Prasanthi R Govindarajan; Elizabeth B Jones; Arthur M Pancioli; Rebecca D Pentz; Victoria M Scicluna; David W Wright; Neal W Dickert
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Patients' perspectives of enrollment in research without consent: the patients' experiences in emergency research-progesterone for the treatment of traumatic brain injury study.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Victoria M Scicluna; Jill M Baren; Michelle H Biros; Ross J Fleischman; Prasanthi R Govindarajan; Elizabeth B Jones; Arthur M Pancioli; David W Wright; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Consulting communities when patients cannot consent: a multicenter study of community consultation for research in emergency settings.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Victoria A Mah; Michelle H Biros; Deneil M Harney; Robert Silbergleit; Jeremy Sugarman; Emir Veledar; Kevin P Weinfurt; David W Wright; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Meeting unique requirements: Community consultation and public disclosure for research in emergency setting using exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Kathleen Metz; Michael D Fetters; Adrianne N Haggins; Deneil K Harney; Candace D Speight; Robert Silbergleit
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 7.  Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.

Authors:  Nina H Gobat; Micaela Gal; Nick A Francis; Kerenza Hood; Angela Watkins; Jill Turner; Ronald Moore; Steve A R Webb; Christopher C Butler; Alistair Nichol
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Qualitative evaluation of a deferred consent process in paediatric emergency research: a PREDICT study.

Authors:  Jeremy Furyk; Kristin McBain-Rigg; Kerrianne Watt; Theophilus I Emeto; Richard C Franklin; Donna Franklin; Andreas Schibler; Stuart R Dalziel; Franz E Babl; Catherine Wilson; Natalie Phillips; Robin Ray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Enrollment with and without exception from informed consent in a pilot trial of tranexamic acid in children with hemorrhagic injuries.

Authors:  Seth W Linakis; Nathan Kuppermann; Rachel M Stanley; Hilary Hewes; Sage Myers; John M VanBuren; T Charles Casper; Matthew Bobinski; Simona Ghetti; Walton O Schalick; Daniel K Nishijima
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.

Authors:  Melissa J Parker; Sonya de Laat; Lisa Schwartz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.