Literature DB >> 23602421

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

Saebeom Hur1, Jin Wook Chung, Hyo-Cheol Kim, Do-Youn Oh, Se-Hoon Lee, Yung-Jue Bang, Woo Ho Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) with hepatic metastasis who were treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and determine prognostic factors that affect clinical outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with NET with hepatic metastasis who underwent chemoembolization between April 2002 and July 2011 were included in this single-center, retrospective study. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. The influence of possible prognostic factors on survival was analyzed by log-rank method and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards method.
RESULTS: Forty-six patients with hepatic metastasis from nonpancreatic NETs (npNETs; n = 24) or pancreatic NETs (pNETs; n = 22) were included. The median PFS and OS times for the entire group were 16.2 and 38.6 months, respectively, and response rate was 58.1%. Patients with npNET had a similar PFS (17.4 mo vs 15.3 mo) and longer OS (55.0 mo vs 27.6 mo) compared with those with pNET, but there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between groups (P = .398 and P = .375, respectively). By univariate analysis, enterobiliary communication, hepatic tumor burden, and extrahepatic metastasis before the first chemoembolization were significant prognostic factors for poor OS (P = .001, P = .010, and P<.0001, respectively). By multivariate analysis, the same prognostic factors were significant and had relative risks of 4.63, 2.71, and 5.09, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is an effective treatment modality for hepatic metastasis from NETs, with a median OS of 38.6 months and response rate of 58%. Enterobiliary communication, large hepatic tumor burden, and extrahepatic metastasis were significant risk factors for poor survival outcome.
Copyright © 2013 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23602421     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  16 in total

1.  Semi-quantitative visual assessment of hepatic tumor burden can reliably predict survival in neuroendocrine liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Sanaz Ameli; Ankur Pandey; Pegah Khoshpouri; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Pallavi Pandey; Zhen Li; Daoyu Hu; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Elevated Alkaline Phosphatase Prior to Transarterial Chemoembolization for Neuroendocrine Tumors Predicts Worse Outcomes.

Authors:  Jill K Onesti; Lawrence A Shirley; Neil D Saunders; Gail W Davidson; Mary E Dillhoff; Hooman Khabiri; Gregory E Guy; Joshua D Dowell; Carl R Schmidt; Manisha H Shah; Mark Bloomston
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  The place of liver transplantation in the treatment of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: Pros and cons.

Authors:  Carlo Sposito; Michele Droz Dit Busset; Davide Citterio; Marco Bongini; Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Imaging Biomarkers of Tumor Response in Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization: Can Enhancing Tumor Burden of the Whole Liver Help Predict Patient Survival?

Authors:  Sonia Sahu; Ruediger Schernthaner; Roberto Ardon; Julius Chapiro; Yan Zhao; Jae Ho Sohn; Florian Fleckenstein; MingDe Lin; Jean-François Geschwind; Rafael Duran
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Prognostic value of baseline volumetric multiparametric MR imaging in neuroendocrine liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Ankur Pandey; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Pallavi Pandey; Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh; Manijeh Zarghampour; Pegah Khoshpouri; Sanaz Ameli; Zhen Li; Daoyu Hu; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Analysis of Tumor Burden as a Biomarker for Patient Survival with Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases Undergoing Intra-Arterial Therapies: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Milena Miszczuk; Julius Chapiro; Duc Do Minh; Johanna Maria Mijntje van Breugel; Susanne Smolka; Irvin Rexha; Bruno Tegel; MingDe Lin; Lynn Jeanette Savic; Kelvin Hong; Christos Georgiades; Nariman Nezami
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 7.  Liver transarterial embolizations in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Louis de Mestier; Magaly Zappa; Olivia Hentic; Valérie Vilgrain; Philippe Ruszniewski
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  Prolonged progression-free survival achieved by octreotide LAR plus transarterial embolization in low-to-intermediate grade neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases with high hepatic tumor burden.

Authors:  Yiming Liu; Haikuan Liu; Wenchuan Chen; Hang Yu; Wang Yao; Wenzhe Fan; Jiaping Li; Minhu Chen; Jie Chen; Yu Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 9.  Liver-Directed Therapies for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Ashley Kieran Clift; Andrea Frilling
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Factors affecting periprocedural morbidity and mortality and long-term patient survival after arterial embolization of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

Authors:  Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Diane Reidy-Lagunes; Ivan K Ip; William Alago; Anne M Covey; Joseph P Erinjeri; Lynn A Brody; Majid Maybody; Raymond H Thornton; Stephen B Solomon; George I Getrajdman; Karen T Brown
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.