Literature DB >> 23602101

Hidden diversity in wild Beta taxa from Portugal: insights from genome size and ploidy level estimations using flow cytometry.

Sílvia Castro1, Maria M Romeiras, Mariana Castro, Maria Cristina Duarte, João Loureiro.   

Abstract

Crop wild relatives constitute a broad pool of potentially useful genetic resources for plant breeders. The genus Beta L. (Amaranthaceae) is an important source of crops, primarily for sugar production. Until recently, species within Section Beta were mostly cytogenetically uniform, with diploidy being prevalent. Still, with the discovery of tetraploid individuals of the wild B. macrocarpa in the Canary Islands, a large-scale study was necessary to evaluate the cytogenetic diversity within the wild Beta. For that, genome size and ploidy level of B. vulgaris subsp. maritima and B. macrocarpa from 21 populations across Portugal mainland and islands, including all know populations of the later taxon, were estimated using propidium iodide flow cytometry. This work revealed a cytogenetically diverse scenario. The analyzed populations were mostly diploid, except for one population of B. vulgaris subsp. maritima that presented both diploid and tetraploid individuals, and for two populations of B. macrocarpa where two or three cytotypes (diploids, tetraploids and/or hexaploids) were found. The nuclear DNA content of diploid individuals was estimated as 1.44±0.035 and 1.41±0.027 pg/2C for B. vulgaris subsp. maritima and B. macrocarpa, respectively. Also, leaves of both species presented variable levels of endopolyploidy. The obtained results are discussed within the context of interspecific hybridization and cryptic diversity and constitute significant data for the conservation of these wild Beta crop relatives.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23602101     DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Sci        ISSN: 0168-9452            Impact factor:   4.729


  6 in total

1.  Chloroplastic and nuclear diversity of wild beets at a large geographical scale: Insights into the evolutionary history of the Beta section.

Authors:  Pascal Touzet; Sarah Villain; Laetitia Buret; Hélène Martin; Anne-Catherine Holl; Céline Poux; Joël Cuguen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Genetic and Genomic Tools to Asssist Sugar Beet Improvement: The Value of the Crop Wild Relatives.

Authors:  Filipa Monteiro; Lothar Frese; Sílvia Castro; Maria C Duarte; Octávio S Paulo; João Loureiro; Maria M Romeiras
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Complete pan-plastome sequences enable high resolution phylogenetic classification of sugar beet and closely related crop wild relatives.

Authors:  Tony Heitkam; Daniela Holtgräwe; Katharina Sielemann; Boas Pucker; Nicola Schmidt; Prisca Viehöver; Bernd Weisshaar
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Genetic diversity and differentiation of Juniperus thurifera in Spain and Morocco as determined by SSR.

Authors:  Helena Teixeira; Susana Rodríguez-Echeverría; Cristina Nabais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatial genetic structure in Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima and Beta macrocarpa reveals the effect of contrasting mating system, influence of marine currents, and footprints of postglacial recolonization routes.

Authors:  Marie Leys; Eric J Petit; Yasmina El-Bahloul; Camille Liso; Sylvain Fournet; Jean-François Arnaud
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Evolutionary and Biogeographic Insights on the Macaronesian Beta-Patellifolia Species (Amaranthaceae) from a Time-Scaled Molecular Phylogeny.

Authors:  Maria M Romeiras; Ana Vieira; Diogo N Silva; Monica Moura; Arnoldo Santos-Guerra; Dora Batista; Maria Cristina Duarte; Octávio S Paulo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.