Literature DB >> 23602065

Comparison of cardiothoracic training curricula: integrated six-year versus traditional programs.

Sarah T Ward1, Danielle Smith, Adin-Cristian Andrei, George L Hicks, Richard J Shemin, John H Calhoon, Carolyn Reed, Edward D Verrier, David A Fullerton, Richard Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, cardiothoracic residency programs are 2 or 3 years in length and require the completion of a general surgery residency. Six-year integrated programs (IP) that directly match fourth-year medical students have been recently developed. Our objective was to examine the curricula of traditional 2-year (T2) and 3-year (T3) programs and compare them to the curricula of IP.
METHODS: We requested curricula from the directors of all IP, T2, and T3 programs participating in the 2011 to 2012 match. We compared the median number of months spent on a cardiothoracic (CT) rotation, an adult cardiac rotation, a thoracic rotation, and a congenital rotation, as well as time spent on "other" nonsurgical rotations. Traditional programs were categorized into 1 of 3 pathways: combined cardiothoracic (CCT), adult cardiac (AC), or general thoracic (GT).
RESULTS: Integrated programs spend more time on general thoracic rotations when compared with CCT-T2, CCT-T3, AC-T2, and AC-T3 pathways (p = 0.009, p = 0.046, p = 0.001 and p = 0.028, respectively). The IP spend a similar amount of time on CT, adult cardiac, and congenital rotations when compared when 2- and 3-year CCT, AC, and GT pathways. Of note, IP spend significantly more time on "other" nonsurgical rotations than all other pathways (p < 0.001 to 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Integrated programs should not be considered "cardiac pathways" as they spend a significant amount of time on thoracic rotations. Additional nonsurgical rotations provide an opportunity for residents in IP to develop unique skills not currently provided in traditional programs.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23602065     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

Review 1.  Where does the new regime of medical specialty certification go?

Authors:  Hikaru Matsuda
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-17

Review 2.  Cardiovascular Surgery Procedural Training and Evaluation: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Qasim Al Abri; Moritz C Wyler von Ballmoos
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  First nationwide survey of US integrated 6-year cardiothoracic surgical residency program directors.

Authors:  Amir H Lebastchi; John J Tackett; Michael Argenziano; John H Calhoon; Mario G Gasparri; Michael E Halkos; George L Hicks; Mark D Iannettoni; John S Ikonomidis; Patrick M McCarthy; Sandra L Starnes; Betty C Tong; David D Yuh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 5.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.