| Literature DB >> 23601733 |
Stephen Bunch1, Gerhard Wevers.
Abstract
Historically firearm and toolmark examiners have rendered categorical or inconclusive opinions and eschewed probabilistic ones, especially in the United States. We suggest this practice may no longer be necessary or desirable, and outline an alternative approach that is within a comprehensive logical/Bayesian paradigm. Hypothetical forensic and non-forensic examples are provided for readers who are practicing firearm and toolmark examiners, and the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches are considered.Year: 2013 PMID: 23601733 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.12.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Justice ISSN: 1355-0306 Impact factor: 2.124