Literature DB >> 23601733

Application of likelihood ratios for firearm and toolmark analysis.

Stephen Bunch1, Gerhard Wevers.   

Abstract

Historically firearm and toolmark examiners have rendered categorical or inconclusive opinions and eschewed probabilistic ones, especially in the United States. We suggest this practice may no longer be necessary or desirable, and outline an alternative approach that is within a comprehensive logical/Bayesian paradigm. Hypothetical forensic and non-forensic examples are provided for readers who are practicing firearm and toolmark examiners, and the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches are considered.
Copyright © 2013 Forensic Science Society. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23601733     DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  2 in total

1.  Estimating error rates for firearm evidence identifications in forensic science.

Authors:  John Song; Theodore V Vorburger; Wei Chu; James Yen; Johannes A Soons; Daniel B Ott; Nien Fan Zhang
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners.

Authors:  Keith L Monson; Erich D Smith; Stanley J Bajic
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2022-02-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.