Literature DB >> 23601507

Transcatheter interatrial septal defect closure in a large cohort: midterm follow-up results.

Kudret Aytemir1, Ali Oto, Süheyla Özkutlu, Uğur Canpolat, Ergün Barış Kaya, Hikmet Yorgun, Levent Şahiner, Hamza Sunman, Ahmet Hakan Ateş, Giray Kabakçı.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated immediate and midterm results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) using various closure devices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included four hundred fourteen patients (one hundred eighty-two men, two hundred thirty-two women; mean age 39 ± 12.3 years; range 17-67 years) who underwent transcatheter closure of secundum ASD (n = 193) or PFO (n = 221). All the patients were evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography before the procedure. Transcatheter closure was performed by using Amplatzer (n = 184), Occlutech Figulla (n = 209), or BioSTAR (n = 21) devices. Closure of ASDs was performed under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiography guidance, and closure of PFOs was performed under local anesthesia with transthoracic echocardiography guidance. Follow-up controls were at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. The median follow-up periods of ASD and PFO patients were 43 and 30 months.
RESULTS: The mean device size was 19.3 ± 6.2 mm for ASD patients and 24.6 ± 2.6 mm for PFO patients. The mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 22.3 ± 4.7 and 4.1 ± 1.9 minutes for ASD closure and 12.4 ± 3.2 and 3.1 ± 1.2 minutes for PFO closure, respectively. Procedural device embolization occurred in only two patients (0.48%). During follow-up, recurrent embolic events occurred in four patients (1.8%) after PFO closure, and no residual shunts were seen after ASD closure. Device thrombosis developed in two ASD patients during the procedure and in one PFO patient at 12th month of the follow-up (0.72%).
CONCLUSION: Transcatheter closure of PFOs and secundum-type ASDs using the Amplatzer, Occlutech Figulla, and BioSTAR devices is an efficacious and safe therapeutic option.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial Septal Defect; Occluder Device; Patent Foramen Ovale

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23601507     DOI: 10.1111/chd.12057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis        ISSN: 1747-079X            Impact factor:   2.007


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of Figulla Flex® and Amplatzer™ devices for atrial septal defect closure: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alvaro Aparisi; Roman J Arnold; Hipólito Gutiérrez; Ana Revilla; Ana Serrador; Benigno Ramos; Tania Rodriguez-Gabella; Alberto Campo; Carlos Baladrón; Itziar Gómez; Manuel Carrasco-Moraleja; José A San Roman; Ignacio J Amat-Santos
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  The influence of deficient retro-aortic rim on technical success and early adverse events following device closure of secundum atrial septal defects: An Analysis of the IMPACT Registry®.

Authors:  Michael L O'Byrne; Matthew J Gillespie; Kevin F Kennedy; Yoav Dori; Jonathan J Rome; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Echocardiographic Evaluation of Changes in Cardiac Hemodynamics and Loading Conditions after Transthoracic Minimally Invasive Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defect.

Authors:  Qiang Chen; Xu-Dong Sun; Hua Cao; Gui-Can Zhang; Liang-Wan Chen; Yun-Nan Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Safety and efficacy of transthoracic versus transesophageal echocardiography in transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. Reporting a single center experience from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmad S Azhar
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defects guided completely by transthoracic echocardiography: A single cardiac center experience with 152 cases.

Authors:  Qiang Chen; Hua Cao; Gui Can Zhang; Liang Wan Chen; Heng Lu; Lin Li Yu
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  Midterm Follow-up Results of Transcatheter Interatrial Septal Defect Closure.

Authors:  Mehdi Ghaderian; Mohammad Reza Sabri; Ali Reza Ahmadi; Mohammad-Reza Alipour; Bahare Dehghan; Mahdie Mehrpour
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

7.  Comparative Study between Surgical Repair of Atrial Septal Defect via Median Sternotomy, Right Submammary Thoracotomy, and Right Vertical Infra-Axillary Thoracotomy.

Authors:  Zeng-Rong Luo; Qiang Chen; Ling-Li Yu; Liang-Wan Chen; Zhong-Yao Huang
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-01

8.  Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Closure Using the Occlutech Figulla Device in Adults: More than 800 Patient-Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  R J R Snijder; L E Renes; D Bosshardt; M J Suttorp; J M Ten Berg; M C Post
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Optimization of Echo Views for Percutaneous Device Closure of Pediatric Atrial Septal Defect through the Femoral Vein Guided by Transthoracic Echocardiography without Radiation.

Authors:  Zankai Ye; Zhiqiang Li; Hanlu Yi; Yaobin Zhu; Yan Sun; Hongju Zhang; Pei Li; Ning Ma
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia.

Authors:  Roel J R Snijder; Laura E Renes; Martin J Swaans; Maarten Jan Suttorp; Jurrien M Ten Berg; Martijn C Post
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.