Literature DB >> 23601121

A comparison of various rural wastewater treatment processes for the removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs).

Zhimin Qiang1, Huiyu Dong, Bing Zhu, Jiuhui Qu, Yafeng Nie.   

Abstract

The removal of six endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), including estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), 17α-ethinyl estradiol (EE2), bisphenol A (BPA) and 4-nonylphenol (NP), was investigated in 20 rural wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs) located in a county of Zhejiang Province, China. These WWTFs adopted one of the four treatment processes: activated sludge (AS), constructed wetland (CW), stabilization pond (SP), and micro-power biofilm reactor (MP). Results indicate that all the six EDCs were detected in wastewater samples with NP showing a maximum detection frequency (97%) and a maximum influent concentration (5002 ng L(-1)). After biological treatment, the concentrations of E2, E3 and NP decreased remarkably, while E1, EE2 and BPA exhibited varying removal efficiencies that depended on the specific treatment process and sampling season. In general, the centralized AS process outperformed those decentralized processes (i.e., CW, SP and MP) and a higher removal of E1, EE2, NP and BPA in the AS process was observed in summer (>70%) than in winter. Among the three decentralized processes, the removal of EDCs in the SP process was limited, especially for E1, EE2 and BPA (18-46%) in winter. Due to an incomplete removal, the total concentration of target EDCs increased obviously in the mixing and downstream sections of a local river receiving the effluent from a typical WWTF (practicing AS). This study reveals that the design and operation of rural WWTFs should be optimized if an effective removal of EDCs is to be achieved.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals; Removal efficiency; Rural areas; Seasonal variation; Wastewater treatment process

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23601121     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  7 in total

Review 1.  The ability of biologically based wastewater treatment systems to remove emerging organic contaminants--a review.

Authors:  Aida Garcia-Rodríguez; Víctor Matamoros; Clàudia Fontàs; Victòria Salvadó
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Pharmacopollution and Household Waste Medicine (HWM): how reverse logistics is environmentally important to Brazil.

Authors:  André Luiz Pereira; Raphael Tobias de Vasconcelos Barros; Sandra Rosa Pereira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Phthalates removal efficiency in different wastewater treatment technology in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Authors:  Taofeek Salaudeen; Omobola Okoh; Foluso Agunbiade; Anthony Okoh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Occurrence, fate, and risk assessment of selected endocrine disrupting chemicals in wastewater treatment plants and receiving river of Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Sihan Ma; Liang Tang; Rui Sun; Jiajia Xiang; Bentuo Xu; Yangyang Bao; Minghong Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Simultaneous Degradation of Estrone, 17β-Estradiol and 17α-Ethinyl Estradiol in an Aqueous UV/H₂O₂ System.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Ma; Chao Zhang; Jing Deng; Yali Song; Qingsong Li; Yaping Guo; Cong Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Enhanced Phytoremediation of Bisphenol A in Polluted Lake Water by Seedlings of Ceratophyllum demersum and Myriophyllum spicatum from In Vitro Culture.

Authors:  Chong Zhao; Guosen Zhang; Jinhui Jiang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Global Assessment of Bisphenol A in the Environment: Review and Analysis of Its Occurrence and Bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Jone Corrales; Lauren A Kristofco; W Baylor Steele; Brian S Yates; Christopher S Breed; E Spencer Williams; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.658

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.