Literature DB >> 23601029

Lingual versus buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture: a prospective comparative analysis.

Adittya K Sharma1, Ratkal Chandrashekar, Ramaiah Keshavamurthy, Girish G Nelvigi, Ananth J Kamath, Satyam Sharma, G K Venkatesh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare lingual and buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture with respect to intraoperative, postoperative parameters and urethroplasty outcome.
METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2011, a total of 30 patients with anterior urethral stricture whereas group 2 underwent dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty. Patients were evaluated for postoperative, tongue protrusion, oral opening, and difficulty in speech and swallowing pain score. Surgical outcome was evaluated with pre- and postoperative work-up involving retrograde urethrogram, uroflow and urethroscopy.
RESULTS: Mean age, stricture length and overall pain score were comparable in two groups. All the patients were mostly pain free by postoperative day 7. Group 1 patients had significant difficulty in speech and delayed return to normal diet as compared with group 2. The group 2 patients had a significant reduction in oral opening for the first week after surgery. In group 1, approximately 20% patients (with bilateral lingual grafts and stricture length >7 cm) complained of a change in speech character with restricted tongue movement in the long term, whereas there was no significant long-term morbidity in group 2. At mean follow up of 14.5 months, urethroplasty outcome was comparable in the two groups with one failure in group 1, and two failures in group 2.
CONCLUSION: Lingual mucosa graft urethroplasty provides outcomes equivalent to those of buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty. Postoperative morbidity and long-term change in speech make it a second choice for strictures >7 cm, only for cases where buccal mucosa graft is unavailable.
© 2013 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  buccal mucosa; lingual mucosa; urethral stricture; urethroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23601029     DOI: 10.1111/iju.12158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  10 in total

Review 1.  Graft surgery in extensive urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Miroslav L Djordjevic
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  A brief review on anterior urethral strictures.

Authors:  Li Cheng; Sen Li; Zicheng Wang; Bingwei Huang; Jian Lin
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-12-31

Review 3.  Lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty 12 years later: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Abrate; Andrea Gregori; Alchiede Simonato
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-01-09

4.  The effect of closure versus nonclosure of lingual mucosa graft harvest site on postoperative morbidity in augmentation urethroplasty: A comparative study.

Authors:  Anil Gulani; Sher Singh Yadav; Vinay Tomar; Shivam Priyadarshi; Vivek Kumar Singh
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

5.  Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply?

Authors:  Felix Campos-Juanatey; Ainara Azueta Etxebarria; Paola Calleja Hermosa; Sara Marcos Gonzalez; Eneko Alonso Mediavilla; Miguel Angel Correas Gomez; Jose Antonio Portillo Martin; Jose Luis Gutierrrez Baños
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  New frontiers in urethral reconstruction: injectables and alternative grafts.

Authors:  Alex J Vanni
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-02

7.  Outcome of buccal mucosa and lingual mucosa graft urethroplasty in the management of urethral strictures: A comparative study.

Authors:  Sharad Chauhan; Sher Singh Yadav; Vinay Tomar
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

8.  Lingual mucosal graft two-stage Bracka technique for redo hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Ahmed Sakr; Ehab Elkady; Mohamed Abdalla; Amr Fawzi; Mostafa Kamel; Esam Desoky; Mohamed Seleem; Mohamed Omran; Ehab Elsayed; Salem Khalil
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-07-19

Review 9.  Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Shengwei Xiong; Jie Wang; Weijie Zhu; Kunlin Yang; Guangpu Ding; Xuesong Li; Daniel D Eun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Encapsulated three-dimensional bioprinted structure seeded with urothelial cells: a new construction technique for tissue-engineered urinary tract patch.

Authors:  Yi-Peng Jin; Chong Shi; Yuan-Yi Wu; Ji-Lei Sun; Jiang-Ping Gao; Yong Yang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.