Literature DB >> 23600679

Evolution of diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Azadeh Houshmand1, Dorte Møller Jensen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Peter Damm.   

Abstract

The establishment of universal diagnostic guidelines for gestational diabetes mellitus has been a long time coming. The lack of consensus and uniformity in procedures for diagnosing this disease has been a problem ever since its existence was recognized. The USA, European countries, and Australia have each developed their own guidelines through the years, all based either on the maternal risk of subsequent diabetes, on arbitrary statistics, or on studies conducted on non-pregnant women. None of these guidelines have been based on risk for perinatal complications. Recently, the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes study demonstrated that maternal hyperglycemia is associated with perinatal risk in a linear way with no obvious threshold. The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group has translated these results into clinical practice by proposing new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus, based for the first time on perinatal outcome.
© 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23600679     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  A proposal for the use of uniform diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Europe: an opinion paper by the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).

Authors:  Katrien Benhalima; Chantal Mathieu; Peter Damm; André Van Assche; Roland Devlieger; Gernot Desoye; Rosa Corcoy; Tahir Mahmood; Jacky Nizard; Charles Savona-Ventura; Fidelma Dunne
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Gestational Diabetes Testing, Narrative, and Medical Distrust.

Authors:  Jennifer Edwell; Jordynn Jack
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 3.  Updated guidelines on screening for gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Yashdeep Gupta; Bharti Kalra; Manash P Baruah; Rajiv Singla; Sanjay Kalra
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-05-19

4.  The relative importance of maternal body mass index and glucose levels for prediction of large-for-gestational-age births.

Authors:  Kerstin Berntorp; Eva Anderberg; Rickard Claesson; Claes Ignell; Karin Källén
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  HbA1c as screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Ingrid Hov Odsæter; Arne Åsberg; Eszter Vanky; Sven Magnus Carlsen
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.763

6.  Hemoglobin A1c as screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Nordic Caucasian women.

Authors:  Ingrid Hov Odsæter; Arne Åsberg; Eszter Vanky; Siv Mørkved; Signe Nilssen Stafne; Kjell Åsmund Salvesen; Sven Magnus Carlsen
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.320

7.  Influence of different diagnostic criteria on gestational diabetes mellitus incidence and medical expenditures in China.

Authors:  Zonglin He; Huatao Xie; Shangqiang Liang; Yuan Tang; Wenjing Ding; Yanxin Wu; Wai-Kit Ming
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.232

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.