Kathy Kotnowski1, David Hammond. 1. School of Public Health & Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Abstract
AIMS: To use tobacco industry documents on cigarette pack shape, size and openings to identify industry findings on associations with brand imagery, product attributes, consumer perceptions and behaviour. METHODS: Internal tobacco industry research and marketing documents obtained through court disclosure contained in the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library were searched using keywords related to pack shapes, sizes and opening methods. The search identified 66 documents related to consumer research and marketing plans on pack shape, size and openings, drawn from 1973 to 2002. RESULTS: Industry research consistently found that packs that deviated from the traditional flip-top box projected impressions of 'modern', 'elegant' and 'unique' brand imagery. Alternative pack shape and openings were identified as an effective means to communicate product attributes, particularly with regard to premium quality and smooth taste. Consumer studies consistently found that pack shape, size and opening style influenced perceptions of reduced product harm, and were often used to communicate a 'lighter' product. Slim, rounded, oval and booklet packs were found to be particularly appealing among young adults, and several studies demonstrated increased purchase interest for tobacco products presented in novel packaging shape or opening. Evidence from consumer tracking reports and company presentations indicate that pack innovations in shape or opening method increased market share of brands. CONCLUSIONS: Consumer research by the tobacco industry between 1973 and 2002 found that variations in packaging shape, size and opening method could influence brand appeal and risk perceptions and increase cigarette sales.
AIMS: To use tobacco industry documents on cigarette pack shape, size and openings to identify industry findings on associations with brand imagery, product attributes, consumer perceptions and behaviour. METHODS: Internal tobacco industry research and marketing documents obtained through court disclosure contained in the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library were searched using keywords related to pack shapes, sizes and opening methods. The search identified 66 documents related to consumer research and marketing plans on pack shape, size and openings, drawn from 1973 to 2002. RESULTS: Industry research consistently found that packs that deviated from the traditional flip-top box projected impressions of 'modern', 'elegant' and 'unique' brand imagery. Alternative pack shape and openings were identified as an effective means to communicate product attributes, particularly with regard to premium quality and smooth taste. Consumer studies consistently found that pack shape, size and opening style influenced perceptions of reduced product harm, and were often used to communicate a 'lighter' product. Slim, rounded, oval and booklet packs were found to be particularly appealing among young adults, and several studies demonstrated increased purchase interest for tobacco products presented in novel packaging shape or opening. Evidence from consumer tracking reports and company presentations indicate that pack innovations in shape or opening method increased market share of brands. CONCLUSIONS: Consumer research by the tobacco industry between 1973 and 2002 found that variations in packaging shape, size and opening method could influence brand appeal and risk perceptions and increase cigarette sales.
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Joseph G L Lee; Kathryn Peebles; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Tob Control Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter; Sonia Boyum; Vetta S Thompson; Charlene A Caburnay; Erika A Waters; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Suchitra Rath; Qiang Fu Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Israel T Agaku; Constantine I Vardavas; Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf; Hillel R Alpert; Gregory N Connolly Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Derek A Pope; Lindsey Poe; Jeffrey S Stein; Brent A Kaplan; William B DeHart; Alexandra M Mellis; Bryan W Heckman; Leonard H Epstein; Frank J Chaloupka; Warren K Bickel Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Christina N Kyriakos; Pete Driezen; Charis Girvalaki; Sara C Hitchman; Filippos T Filippidis; Shannon Gravely; James Balmford; Katerina Nikitara; Ute Mons; Esteve Fernández; Krzysztof Przewoźniak; Antigona C Trofor; Tibor Demjén; Witold Zatoński; Yannis Tountas; Geoffrey T Fong; Constantine I Vardavas Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Sarah Kahnert; Pete Driezen; James Balmford; Christina N Kyriakos; Sarah Aleyan; Sara C Hitchman; Sarah Nogueira; Tibor Demjén; Esteve Fernández; Paraskevi A Katsaounou; Antigona C Trofor; Krzysztof Przewoźniak; Witold A Zatoński; Geoffrey T Fong; Constantine I Vardavas; Ute Mons Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367